Back to @FansLuvBenji's profile

BENJI engagement report

@FansLuvBenji - 54K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 54K followers
Per impression
0.184%
3.3K views on a typical post
Reach
6.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 54K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.184% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 545x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tag: #chi.

Compared with accounts its own size

BENJI's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, BENJI sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,169 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,169 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,723 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 98 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026545x their median

    Flawda Dick 🌴🍆 https://t.co/b1oTw0R2dO

    2.9K30224237K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026294x their median

    The gay for pay thing ( from straight humans ) is confusing . Wouldn’t that make you … nvm lol

    1.5K113864081K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026207x their median

    The trans girls paved the way for ALL of us. They forever get my respect

    8402608060146K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026192x their median

    This is a safe space, right? Y’all not gon beat me up? I LOVE seeing a masculine man with a man who exudes more femininity. There’s something about that visible balance of energies that is SO sexy to me. And before y’all start, Two masculine men or two feminine men can have their own balance too. I’m just talking about MY eyes and MY attraction. Give me that masculine + feminine energy together whew.

    947102643785K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026145x their median

    Pizza Hut better than dominos!

    3542047723360K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026130x their median

    why do girls suddenly feel so comfortable calling us PONKS??? https://t.co/hIy81a4gCd

    59365863333K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202676x their median

    gay & trans people have to come together and remember straight people are our enemies and not each other

    34478261014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202665x their median

    Idgaf if I was born in 1999. I’m still a 90’s BABY BITCH😂😭‼️

    29035521522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20268.0x their median

    push them knees back and put them feet on my chest

    4402220K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20263.2x their median

    Straight creators be mad you don’t buy they content 🤣🤣🤣 clearly women don’t buy they shi so they run to the gays n wanna block ya lmao

    160301.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chi

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 54K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.184% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 545x its own typical post.

What is BENJI's engagement rate on X?
BENJI (@FansLuvBenji) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 53,781 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, BENJI sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,169 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FansLuvBenji have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FansLuvBenji post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going