Back to @FantasyPros's profile

FantasyPros engagement report

@FantasyPros - 493K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 493K followers
Per impression
0.324%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
4.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
74
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.324% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 32% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 692 interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nfl, #preseason.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #nfl, #preseason.

Compared with accounts its own size

FantasyPros's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, FantasyPros sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20269.4x their median

    https://t.co/JVKtMRYW25

    67895036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.9x their median

    Making your 2nd-round pick and then seeing everybody in the chat ask if you saw the latest injury update https://t.co/eDoiPA869N

    57393141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.2x their median

    Which RB would you rather have? šŸˆ Jonathan Taylor šŸˆ James Cook https://t.co/d3XFIyvmt5

    40971086105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.1x their median

    Friendly reminder that Davante Adams was the WR8 last year https://t.co/dKk7zQ6TPB

    438312035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.3x their median

    Where did Malik Nabers go in your most recent draft? https://t.co/kMRCztMKHe

    279139149K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.3x their median

    Is Saquon Barkley being...undervalued? https://t.co/rqWC65CuE3

    293222245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.2x their median

    "Tucker is exactly the type of pick you want to make to round out your wide receiver room" -@FAmmiranteTFJ https://t.co/vLSr0yZDrZ

    22954153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.9x their median

    True or False: De'Zhaun Stribling will reach 275 fantasy points this season šŸ¤” https://t.co/XRs00Re3OI

    197021032K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.4x their median

    What side are you on? šŸˆ Early TE šŸˆ Punt TE https://t.co/g1vnbqdCEf

    103073354K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.8x their median

    Name every RB you're taking over Kenneth Walker III this season šŸ‘‡ https://t.co/7xHBmAI8qn

    113018061K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nfl#preseason

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.324% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 32% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 692 interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nfl, #preseason.

What is FantasyPros's engagement rate on X?
FantasyPros (@FantasyPros) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 492,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, FantasyPros sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FantasyPros have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FantasyPros post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going