Back to @FareedZakaria's profile

Fareed Zakaria engagement report

@FareedZakaria - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.737%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
3.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
367
interactions (median)
Saved
0.118%
59 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 367 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.737% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fareed Zakaria's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Fareed Zakaria sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 202623x their median

    For decades, Sweden was known for its inclusive welfare state and its strong voice on human rights. But recently, the country has come to resemble something very different: an ultra-capitalist haven, with an increasingly tough approach on immigration. I explained what changed: https://t.co/Z3epDw8IBl

    6.4K1.2K5402361.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202611x their median

    Democrats are facing a dilemma: The left has the passion, but the middle still has the votes the party needs to win in general elections. To win, Democrats don’t need to move left on economics. They need to move to the center on cultural issues. My take: https://t.co/5kyDsei6UH

    2.8K458635187414K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20266.5x their median

    President Trump's tariffs have made the US into a paragon of protectionism. The result has been higher prices, weaker investment, fewer manufacturing jobs — and a willingness to make falsehood official policy in order to defend a failed economic creed. My take: https://t.co/SXLshuZQbh

    1.7K605983094K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20266.5x their median

    The result of President Trump’s tariffs has not been a manufacturing renaissance. It has been higher prices, weaker investment, fewer manufacturing jobs — and a willingness to make falsehood official policy in order to defend a failed economic creed. My latest column: https://t.co/8MoZgoguBD

    1.6K696693268K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20265.7x their median

    For eight decades, the U.S. built up something as powerful as aircraft carriers and squadrons of F-35s: credibility. The Iran war has been a master class in how to squander it. My latest column: https://t.co/HFo9O71vv8

    1.5K45910635235K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20265.2x their median

    Iran's economy has been pummeled by war and sanctions. So why has that country not been compelled to make peace? The answer lies in part in Tehran's surprising degree of economic resilience: https://t.co/FLRTy7UhQ3

    1.5K30310817164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.7x their median

    From the war with Iran to dealings with allies, President Trump has put on a master class in how to squander credibility. Now countries are building insurance policies. It's evidence of a deepening loss of faith in America’s word. My take: https://t.co/KKKMZrl3jm

    1.3K3216723108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.1x their median

    China spends a fraction of what the US does on data centers, and lacks the most advanced AI chips. Why, then, does its AI industry appear to be catching up, and rivaling Silicon Valley? I asked @NewYorker staff writer @eosnos who lived in China for eight years, and just returned from another reporting trip there with some fresh insights:

    8132536721106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.1x their median

    Hungary's longtime strongman Viktor Orbán spent 16 years building one of the world’s most prominent illiberal democracies. Now, the country’s new prime minister, Péter Magyar, is trying to tear that old system down. Can he do this while sticking to democratic norms? My thoughts:

    9211655313106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.1x their median

    I went to see “The Odyssey” and have thoughts on what liberals can take away from Christopher Nolan’s film. The moral progress of the West has been one of its greatest achievements. But that does not mean that ambition and heroism must be set aside. My take: https://t.co/kG9yN8vcyq

    8751686621204K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 367 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.737% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is Fareed Zakaria's engagement rate on X?
Fareed Zakaria (@FareedZakaria) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,455,451 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Fareed Zakaria sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FareedZakaria have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FareedZakaria post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going