Back to @FastCoDesign's profile

Co.Design engagement report

@FastCoDesign - 468K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 468K followers
Per impression
0.026%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 468K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 4,124 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.026% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.817% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Co.Design's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,124 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Co.Design sits below the 10th percentile of the 39,924 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.013%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.441%
p902.08%
p99149.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 39,924 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 93,203 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.441%
90th percentile2.08%
99th percentile149.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%56K
01:00 UTC-2%57K
02:00 UTC-3%55K
03:00 UTC-4%59K
04:00 UTC-6%47K
05:00 UTC-4%46K
06:00 UTC-4%53K
07:00 UTC-5%57K
08:00 UTC-4%66K
09:00 UTC-4%77K
10:00 UTC-3%79K
11:00 UTC-3%86K
12:00 UTC-2%95K
13:00 UTC-2%103K
14:00 UTC-3%106K
15:00 UTC-2%110K
16:00 UTC-3%107K
17:00 UTC-2%99K
18:00 UTC-2%92K
19:00 UTC-2%87K
20:00 UTC-1%82K
21:00 UTC-1%73K
22:00 UTC-1%63K
23:00 UTC-1%56K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%247K
Monday+1%316K
Tuesday-3%332K
Wednesday-3%282K
Thursday-2%257K
Friday-3%268K
Saturday+3%241K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202612x their median

    SoulCycle didn’t lose riders because people stopped wanting connection or stopped wanting to feel like the strongest version of themselves. It lost riders because, for a moment, its own behavior made that story impossible to believe. https://t.co/4efow7Te6f

    82114.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.0x their median

    Disney’s new short film, “Once a Princess, Always a Princess,” is a dreamscape full of practical effects. Its castles, underwater scenes, and backdrops trick the eye—because they were actually all made by hand. https://t.co/jzA6v3gIN5

    31004.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.0x their median

    Brian Johnson's new book, 'Designed to Be Red: Native & Indigenous Graphic Works,' unpacks 200 years of little-known graphic design history. https://t.co/p3mudCUB9L

    21003.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    A new Spotify campaign from Uncommon Creative Studio taps into the feeling a perfectly curated playlist can evoke. https://t.co/U6m9PM7lzW

    20004.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    Taste, or at least an approximation of it, has become one of the next frontiers in model development. What will it take to get there? https://t.co/qWwpPN52Qn

    11002.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    Seven leading-edge architecture businesses reveal how they’re building their own tools to win in the age of AI. https://t.co/BHmUfTfZef

    10101.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    At their peak in the 1980s, the yellow buses took more than 60% of U.S. students to school. https://t.co/HFkw0fUcGe

    11002.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.0x their median

    If we stop giving young designers the opportunity to enter our industry, who becomes the future custodians of it? https://t.co/Tia0EmkMpb

    11003.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    As states adopt policies with conflicting goals and design standards, the emerging patchwork of laws creates an impossible blueprint for companies looking to redesign their packaging. https://t.co/un0T91DLfb

    01002.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    "She continued to paint until her final days, never setting aside her brush, and continued exploration of forever love and eternal soul." https://t.co/zNpuhPr7cY

    10005.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 468K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 4,124 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.026% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.817% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Co.Design's engagement rate on X?
Co.Design (@FastCoDesign) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 468,440 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Co.Design sits below the 10th percentile of the 39,924 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FastCoDesign have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,124 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FastCoDesign post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going