Back to @FernandoHoliday's profile

Fernando Holiday engagement report

@FernandoHoliday - 539K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.431%
of 539K followers
Per impression
8.38%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
5.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.431%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 8.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bolsonaro, #flaviobolsonaro, #vote22.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #bolsonaro, #flaviobolsonaro, #vote22.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fernando Holiday's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.431%, Fernando Holiday sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.437%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20266.1x their median

    O Missão, partido do MBL, cometeu o crime mais burro da história da Justiça Eleitoral e foi pego com a boca na botija. 🤦🏾‍♂️ Somente um representante do Missão poderia ter adicionado a filiação de Flávio ao sistema do TSE. https://t.co/J0TMzYxIZT

    11K2.3K82368228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20266.0x their median

    Janja lançou o Comitê dos Crentes no PT, mas não se esqueçam que no Carnaval do Rio, estavam lá curtindo da cara dos evangélicos com as famílias in conserva. https://t.co/aXBHfz5wjm

    10.0K2.5K1.2K312330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.9x their median

    O MBL se fudeu https://t.co/mGfzj8RRG3

    5.7K8202571876K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.1x their median

    Eu sinceramente estou com dó do Haddad nesse debate. Se eu fosse ele jamais perdoaria o Lula por obrigar a passar por essa humilhação 😂

    4.4K323138443K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.0x their median

    Essa fraude praticada pelo Missão simulando uma filiação de @FlavioBolsonaro ao partido para impedir sua candidatura pelo PL, demonstra exatamente o que eles são: moleques. Quiseram fazer uma pegadinha usando a Justiça Eleitoral e tentar ganhar votos por W.O.

    3.7K51641419102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    O documento que Moraes usou para deixar Felipe Martins na cadeia era FALSO! Quem vai ressarcir Felipe por tamanha injusta? Quem vai lhe devolver o tempo longe da família? https://t.co/cXtr09gFC6

    2.2K39737615K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Não tenho sombra de dúvida que @FlavioBolsonaro só deve ir em debate que o Lula for. O resto é dar palco para doido dançar. Mas a sabatina no Jornal Nacional é essencial. Especialmente para chegar no eleitorado do nordeste que ainda é muito dependente da TV aberta.

    2.2K141167528K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    https://t.co/4rYct66CuQ

    1.9K303151527K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Tentaram filiar o Flávio no PT, não deu certo. Tentaram filiar o Lula no DC, não deu certo. Mas a filiação falsa do Flávio no Missão seguiu adiante. O único que não impediu a fraude. Ou são muito incompetentes ou cometeram um crime burro para aparecer. 👍🏾

    2.0K186123844K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    Meu candidato a deputado estadual em SP @ThomazSJC 22111 https://t.co/DmPb67B7Qx

    1.7K25034018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bolsonaro#flaviobolsonaro#vote22

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.431%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 8.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bolsonaro, #flaviobolsonaro, #vote22.

What is Fernando Holiday's engagement rate on X?
Fernando Holiday (@FernandoHoliday) has an engagement rate of 0.431%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 538,688 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.431%, Fernando Holiday sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FernandoHoliday have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FernandoHoliday post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going