Back to @FielNaAlma's profile

Fiel Na Alma engagement report

@FielNaAlma - 750K followers on X

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 750K followers
Per impression
5.81%
9.0K views on a typical post
Reach
1.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
523
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.4/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 523 interactions against 750K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 5.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foraarmandomendonça, #intervençãojudicialja, #intervençãojudicialjá.

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #foraarmandomendonça, #intervençãojudicialja, #intervençãojudicialjá.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fiel Na Alma's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, Fiel Na Alma sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202619x their median

    Corinthians vai levar torcedor hostilizado na Neo Química Arena, por receber uma camisa do Neymar, para conhecer os jogadores e o CT do clube. Via: @SportsCenterBR 📷Felipe Oliveira https://t.co/qnwmprv14L

    9.5K168273223355K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202613x their median

    Bateu de frente contra o sistema. ÍDOLO para caralho! https://t.co/RxssCOToJf

    5.8K93672461K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    NOTA OFICIAL SOBRE DECLARAÇÕES DE MEMBRO DO CONSELHO DELIBERATIVO O Gaviões da Fiel Torcida tomou conhecimento de declarações atribuídas a membro do Conselho de Orientação (CORI) do Corinthians, publicadas pela ESPN, nas quais a mobilização da torcida em torno da intervenção judicial e da reforma estatutária foi tratada como incoerente. Chama a atenção o lugar de onde parte a crítica. O CORI existe, em tese, para orientar o clube com zelo pelo patrimônio corinthiano. Enquanto a dívida saltava para perto de R$ 3 bilhões e contratos questionáveis se acumulavam, esse zelo não apareceu. Curiosa é a voz que hoje se sente à vontade para dizer o que a torcida “não sabe”, sendo a mesma que não viu, ou preferiu não ver, o clube sendo dilapidado por dentro. Não é a torcida que precisa explicar suas reivindicações. É o Conselho Deliberativo que precisa explicar por que a reforma estatutária segue emperrada há meses, por que a assembleia de 19 de setembro continua sob ameaça de suspensão por iniciativa de conselheiros e por que quem deveria fiscalizar aprovou, ano após ano, os balanços que empurraram o clube ao abismo financeiro. O Gaviões não pauta suas manifestações por conveniência. Cobrar transparência, apoiar a apuração do Ministério Público e pedir intervenção judicial não são posições contraditórias; são instrumentos diferentes para o mesmo objetivo: devolver ao Corinthians a gestão séria que o Conselho, historicamente, não garantiu. É sintomático que parte do Conselho prefira desqualificar quem protesta pacificamente a responder pelo próprio histórico. Enquanto conselheiros debatem semântica, o rombo financeiro que deveriam fiscalizar segue crescendo. Esse sim, um problema real. O papel de um conselheiro não é menosprezar quem sustenta o clube nas arquibancadas, nas bilheterias e nas lojas. É prestar contas a essa mesma torcida. Fica a pergunta, conselheiro: se a torcida não sabe o que quer, o Conselho sabia o que fazia quando aprovou, um a um, os balanços que trouxeram o Corinthians até aqui? A guerra não é entre nós. A luta é pelo Corinthians. A Diretoria Gaviões da Fiel Torcida

    5.4K73917473176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/hVQpEITzm9

    4.1K1.5K64130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.0x their median

    "A gente precisa ter a bola. Eu brinco muito com os caras que a gente é o 'BARCELONA DO BRASIL', no aspecto de jogo, de gostar de ter a bola." 🎙️ Gabigol, após Corinthians 0x1 Santos. 🎥 @lucas_musetti https://t.co/Cd5f35mrCW

    2.0K35270293295K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.6x their median

    Esse 15 com a faixa de capitão ficou ABSURDO! https://t.co/kvDrR90R8M

    1.9K432682041.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.2x their median

    Neymar foi GIGANTESCO aqui. Hostilizar ele e qualquer jogador de outro clube? concordo 100% Agora fazer isso com uma CRIANÇA pq pegou a camisa de um ídolo NACIONAL? Vcs vão mesmo normalizar essa LOUCURA? Ele ainda elogiou a fiel: "A melhor torcida que tem" Neymar ganhou ainda mais o meu respeito.

    1.9K184762184K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.1x their median

    O sábado foi de mais protestos no Corinthians! Dessa vez, dentro do Parque São Jorge. Protestando pela reforma do estatuto, contra o desaparecimento de uniformes, contra a falta de transparência e também contra o Cori, com a pergunta: “até quando o cori será contra os associados?”

    1.9K178381560K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.0x their median

    Ex-jogador Dinei mais uma vez no protesto junto da Fiel. ⚫️⚪️ 📷 Fiel na Alma https://t.co/99YNQBTNxD

    1.9K11118716K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.7x their median

    O Memphis fazendo questão de dar um abraço no Marcelo Paz. 🤫👏🏼 https://t.co/mm4rOVyzxc

    1.9K521018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#foraarmandomendonça#intervençãojudicialja#intervençãojudicialjá#safieljá

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 523 interactions against 750K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 5.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foraarmandomendonça, #intervençãojudicialja, #intervençãojudicialjá.

What is Fiel Na Alma's engagement rate on X?
Fiel Na Alma (@FielNaAlma) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 87 original posts from the last 30 days against 749,644 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, Fiel Na Alma sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FielNaAlma have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FielNaAlma post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going