Back to @Footballfights's profile

Football Fights engagement report

@Footballfights - 782K followers on X

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.033%
of 782K followers
Per impression
0.319%
81K views on a typical post
Reach
10.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
258
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.03/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 258 interactions against 782K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 0.319% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Football Fights's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.033%, Football Fights sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 202626x their median

    Meanwhile in Ukraine... 😭🇺🇦 https://t.co/hDU4SbSFEM

    6.2K1702559824K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202625x their median

    Meanwhile in the pub... 🙈🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/sOnEL0AVNC

    6.0K196237351.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202621x their median

    When Roberto Soldado unleashed a Vulcan Death Grip on his opponent... 🇪🇦 https://t.co/TobYvDhHuA

    5.1K2152519803K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202620x their median

    3 minutes of pure carnage in Bangladesh... 🙈🇧🇩 https://t.co/drYkUoS0OU

    4.7K2919919434K viewsView on X
  • Feb 8, 202610x their median

    Arguably the worst challenge in Premier League History... 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿😷 https://t.co/fERiMvbm7p

    2.1K27823642747K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.8x their median

    Charlton and Millwall fans clashing... 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🙈 https://t.co/6E7dR8YamV

    1.1K575818315K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20264.1x their median

    Meanwhile in Blackpool... 🙈🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 https://t.co/6j90npCJLa

    98522447374K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.8x their median

    When two Everton fans went looking for beers and ended up in a Sheikhs Palace chilling with a lion! 🦁🇶🇦 https://t.co/YN88aS0EJV

    674305190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.6x their median

    Lyon vs Fenerbahce ended with a Royal Rumble... 🙈 https://t.co/WNhAZ1HlOo

    60557108333K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.5x their median

    MLS pitch invaders come in all shapes and sizes... 🇺🇲🤣 https://t.co/Z15nt8Ojvd

    6082439233K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 258 interactions against 782K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 81K times each, and 0.319% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Football Fights's engagement rate on X?
Football Fights (@Footballfights) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 781,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.033%, Football Fights sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Footballfights have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Footballfights post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going