Back to @Frosty701's profile

FrostyPicks ☃️❄️🐐 engagement report

@Frosty701 - 46K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.425%
of 46K followers
Per impression
2.00%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
21.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.425%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 2.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 481x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FrostyPicks ☃️❄️🐐's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.425%, FrostyPicks ☃️❄️🐐 sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,597 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,597 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,723 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 26, 2026481x their median

    Descansa en paz komanche 🕊️ Merecen prudencia sus amigos y familiares.. respeto.

    85K1.6K5.9K5979.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202677x their median

    Si yo llego a escuchar a un amigo decir esto definitivamente le preguntaría como estás y porque dice eso...💔 https://t.co/eFkeNahBOD

    14K4364845835K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20265.6x their median

    GRACIAS GRACIAS GRACIAS EN SERIO GRACIAS AL UNIVERSO Y A LA VIDA POR TANTAS BENDICIONES 🙏 Gracias a toda la gente que sigue confiando +130 parlays ganados este año :) Bomba 💣 Millonaria GRATIS GANADA Ganaste conmigo? Déjame tu ❤️‍🔥 o tu ticket abajo 👇 https://t.co/24H7nUx47z

    9347968228K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20263.4x their median

    ¿Quieren que igual esta noche les deje mi Parlay de los juegos de mañana mis hermanos? Mañana hay: • NFL • Hockey • NBA

    5851856014K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20262.9x their median

    ¿Les gustaría que mañana les regale todas mis Jugadas o mejor descansamos? 🥷✌🏻❄️

    5031452012K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20262.5x their median

    ¿No alcanzaron a unirse al grupito del reto de $250 a $1,250 gratis? 🤯 Díganme 👇 si son bastantes, les desbloqueo otro enlace más mis Hermanos

    4201064013K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20262.3x their median

    Buenos días ☀️ mis Hermanod Como amanecimos? Excelente Domingo para todos 🥷✌🏻❄️ Ayer ganamos el parlay de 160k gratis por aqui Hoy nos jugamos otro igual? 🟰

    3991338012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.2x their median

    Mis Bros Hoy antes que Apuestas, les deseo que tengan Un día chingón, con salud, con tranquilidad y que No les falte un plato de comida 🍲 en la mesa Y claro también Unas apuestitas Verdes si es que se puede jeje Buen Viernes mis Hermanos 🥷✌🏻❄️

    3921215115K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20262.0x their median

    Hoy tengo ganas de jugarme varias cosas mis Hermanos ¿Quién va conmigo? 🥷✌🏻❄️

    350926010K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20261.9x their median

    NO MAMES NO MAMES NO MAMES QUE FORMA DE GANAR AL MEDIO TIENPO NO MAMES GRÍTENLO CONMIGO MIS HERMANOS GRÍTENLO PERO GRÍTENLO YAAAAAA

    2901556011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.425%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 2.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 481x its own typical post.

What is FrostyPicks ☃️❄️🐐's engagement rate on X?
FrostyPicks ☃️❄️🐐 (@Frosty701) has an engagement rate of 0.425%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 45,899 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.425%, FrostyPicks ☃️❄️🐐 sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,597 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Frosty701 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Frosty701 post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going