Back to @Fun_Viral_Vids's profile

Fun Viral Vids 😊 engagement report

@Fun_Viral_Vids - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 118 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
1.32%
75K views on a typical post
Reach
5.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
989
interactions (median)
Saved
0.107%
80 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 989 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 118 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 118 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 118 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fun Viral Vids 😊's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, Fun Viral Vids 😊 sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202632x their median

    Damn, my lady! In front of everyone? So close but... She didn’t let it drop https://t.co/fEZqZKXPWi

    30K1.1K737626.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202619x their median

    I'm a man, but if I were a woman, I would admire the beauty of these women, who seem to have been sculpted by angels themselves 😍πŸ₯° https://t.co/pztgRVSc0B

    18K59525934795K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202619x their median

    Hands of steel! Watch out! SheΒ΄s definitely my kind of woman https://t.co/5qhopTx5pg

    18K658448652.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202616x their median

    A coincidence makes you think you have hidden superpowers https://t.co/I6qns7kJEz

    15K691221542.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202613x their median

    We die of grief, and they die of laughter https://t.co/tIEedNdTk0

    11K96510280689K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202612x their median

    Some girl shit you won't understand https://t.co/PchJU5mzeE

    11K441294351.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202611x their median

    She has gone and fooled herself again I have to admit this is so smartπŸ˜‰ https://t.co/MG0fimcfjq

    10K705218763.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.5x their median

    The cameraman had a job to do, and you have to admit he has a good focus https://t.co/WAQR18ytHs

    6.2K172483362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.6x their median

    Two-Step Verification https://t.co/wQNdhTsmec

    3.3K2875013176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.5x their median

    She stole the show at the pool with that golden eagle's flight πŸ”ŸπŸ”ŸπŸ”ŸπŸ”ŸπŸ”₯ https://t.co/9p8h3HF6Rx

    3.3K154265115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 989 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 118 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 118 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is Fun Viral Vids 😊's engagement rate on X?
Fun Viral Vids 😊 (@Fun_Viral_Vids) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 118 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,409,960 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, Fun Viral Vids 😊 sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Fun_Viral_Vids have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Fun_Viral_Vids post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going