Back to @GamersNexus's profile

GamersNexus engagement report

@GamersNexus - 899K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.093%
of 899K followers
Per impression
1.85%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
5.02%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
824
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 824 interactions against 899K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

GamersNexus's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.093%, GamersNexus sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 202617x their median

    Update: We are working on a follow-up to the LG story and have some disturbing findings re: LG's products. It will take us a while to parse everything and we have involved multiple security researchers, lawyers (working on reading around 40,000 words of LG agreements that are, generally, terrifying in scope), and network experts, but will have an update for you all as soon as we can finalize collecting all of the information and parsing. There is a lot for us to crawl through (and I'm also already up to thousands of dollars in LG product purchases, but each one peels back another layer of the enshittified onion). This will be a fairly large research piece and will take time, but is also the worst I've seen so far in this 'genre' of product and agreements.

    13K1.1K19677518K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202611x their median

    Pay $50/month for 2 active logins. Use my 2 sessions on my own 2 computers in different rooms so that I can move between my computers. Get kicked out of account and password forcibly changed because yOuR aCcOuNt ApPeArS tO bE In UsE bY MoRe ThAn OnE PeRsOn. Fuck you, @Adobe. https://t.co/dFjpUI511o

    8.2K36426714328K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20263.9x their median

    Big success today. Not necessarily for a video, kind of boring business software stuff, but: Only 2 software suites keep me on Windows, at this point. Adobe and QuickBooks. I've managed to migrate off of QuickBooks, which has killed its desktop software to go cloud only. Fuck that. I was able to find Linux-compatible bookkeeping software that actually works way better than QuickBooks. Much faster and QB was forcing users to go online (no doubt to scrape for AI models), so this is local, fully self-owned data, and no cost. Took all goddamn day, but man was the frustration worth it. Definitely not an easy migration process. I ended up trying several tools - Beancount with FAVA, hledger, Manager, GnuCash, and some others. Have narrowed to two, but the point is that there is a promising path forward and I now only have one set of software keeping me on Windows, which is Adobe. There are solutions for that as well. It's a little more painful since the entire company uses Adobe and, for that reason, we don't have an immediate need to move and there's a lot more inertia. I will start experimenting with alternatives personally though and we'll see if we can roll it out over time. Definitely promising. I fucking hate Windows. The amount of spying is unbelievable at this point, and the pain to find alternatives to all my old tools is at this point lower than the concerns Microsoft introduces.

    2.9K15612911119K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20263.8x their median

    Alternative title: Thieves Are Now Targeting Thieves https://t.co/hrEDTZpe6j

    2.9K19753757K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20263.3x their median

    https://t.co/0iZJ2f0QCK

    2.5K18264455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.4x their median

    It's time to poison AI: https://t.co/8EwLYwl1gX

    1.7K1965110132K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.1x their median

    That is one hell of a selling point. TWO cores?! https://t.co/aATuhkTBE6

    1.6K3268454K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.0x their median

    LG's adware monitors and definitely-not-wiretapping TVs: https://t.co/r78TN5NaiZ

    1.3K2388869193K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20261.9x their median

    I posted this photo on the GN website 10 years ago of DDR4. Checking email receipts of around the time, I paid about $40 for 2x 4GB sticks. https://t.co/fRgKXKRnML

    1.5K4246244K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20261.8x their median

    Captain's Log, Stardate 41997.7. We have found ancient signs of life on Planet Lenovo in a cave known as Escalation. Occupancy unknown. Proceeding with caution.

    1.4K4230141K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 824 interactions against 899K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is GamersNexus's engagement rate on X?
GamersNexus (@GamersNexus) has an engagement rate of 0.093%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 898,970 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.093%, GamersNexus sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GamersNexus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GamersNexus post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going