Back to @GilbertDurinho's profile

GILBERT BURNS DURINHO engagement report

@GilbertDurinho - 938K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 938K followers
Per impression
0.652%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
3.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
212
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.5/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 212 interactions against 938K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.652% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 79x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ufcbelgrade, #ufcsacramento, #ufc331.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #ufcbelgrade, #ufcsacramento, #ufc331.

Compared with accounts its own size

GILBERT BURNS DURINHO's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, GILBERT BURNS DURINHO sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202679x their median

    TIME TO MAKE A STATEMENT πŸ‘€ @ArmanUFC will face @RuffyMMA in the #CryptoCom #UFC331 co-main event! [ Tickets on sale TODAY | LIVE SEP 19 at @CryptoComArena ] https://t.co/Btv93H0Mfl

    15K876443603854K viewsView on X
  • Feb 5, 202675x their median

    πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΏπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎπŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎπŸ‘‰πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘ˆπŸ½πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎπŸ‘‰πŸ½πŸ‘‰πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸ»πŸ‘‡πŸ»πŸ‘‡πŸ»πŸ‘ˆπŸΌπŸ‘ˆπŸ½πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎJ E S U S IS K I N G πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎπŸ‘‰πŸ½πŸ‘‰πŸΌπŸ‘†πŸ»πŸ‘†πŸ»πŸ‘†πŸ»πŸ‘ˆπŸΌπŸ‘ˆπŸ½πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎπŸ‘‰πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸΌπŸ‘†πŸΌπŸ‘†πŸΌπŸ‘†πŸΌπŸ‘†πŸΌπŸ‘ˆπŸ½πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘‰πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘†πŸ½πŸ‘ˆπŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘†πŸΎπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ πŸ‘‰πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘†πŸΏπŸ‘ˆπŸΏ

    15K95715317317K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202647x their median

    4ΒΊ dia de campanha πŸ‘€ NΓ£o vai dar PT! ❌ https://t.co/BhHDa2AZQh

    8.7K1.2K22813113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202632x their median

    🚨 Shavkat Rakhmonov’s father passed away this week, according to Kazakh media outlets Shavkat Rakhmonov since his last fight: - Missed a title shot due to a knee injury - His wife and son were involved in a car crash that resulted in the death of two of his wife’s friends - Went through a divorce with his wife - Re injured his knee that kept him out so long and underwent another surgery - Lost his father An unbelievably difficult stretch for Shavkat 😟

    6.4K20610542563K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202616x their median

    🀝 Gilbert Burns becomes the first UFC fighter to become a manager, making his managerial debut at UFC 330 with Rafael Tobias. ⚑️ Ali Abdelaziz: β€œI think he’s better than 99.9% of the managers right now. ’Cause he felt it, he lived it.” πŸŽ₯ @ufc https://t.co/CgBWcQw6f5

    3.2K83272182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202610x their median

    WELCOME TO THE UFC 🀩 Meet the newest members of the UFC roster! [ B2YB @TotalWireless ] https://t.co/7cVg8Vs5Tw

    1.9K1513621206K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20268.9x their median

    Belgrade Serbia @ufc @BobanMarjanovic @AlexPereiraUFC https://t.co/muvy42DfoK

    1.8K4618678K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20266.8x their median

    Thank you Serbia πŸ‡·πŸ‡Έ!! INAT!

    1.4K2812549K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20266.8x their median

    🚨🚨#UFCSacramento🚨🚨 Anthony Wint (7-0) books first UFC fight against Terrance Chatman (5-1) next week on #UFCSacramento. https://t.co/2L0huzWbou

    1.3K706137260K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.4x their median

    Back in Belgrade to my flight home! Appreciate all the fans in Belgrade Serbia and in Montenegro!! Definitely will be back!! God bless!! Thanks for have me πŸ™ŒπŸΎπŸ™πŸΎ

    1.1K1814030K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ufcbelgrade#ufcsacramento#ufc331#ufcbjj11#cryptocom

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 212 interactions against 938K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 0.652% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 79x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ufcbelgrade, #ufcsacramento, #ufc331.

What is GILBERT BURNS DURINHO's engagement rate on X?
GILBERT BURNS DURINHO (@GilbertDurinho) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 937,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, GILBERT BURNS DURINHO sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GilbertDurinho have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GilbertDurinho post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

GILBERT BURNS DURINHO (@GilbertDurinho) Engagement Rate - 0.023% | PlayerSells