Brian4new engagement report
@GustBrian - 296K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 252 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #breaking.
Compared with accounts its own size
Brian4new's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.085%, Brian4new sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,597 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 116 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 202657x their median
How can you not love baby goats 🥰 https://t.co/ss1VVjYTSp
- Oct 19, 202650x their median
🚨THE BIDEN TAPES THEY FOUGHT LIKE HELL TO BURY JUST DROPPED — AND NOW WE KNOW WHY 70 hours of raw audio the Bidens and Democrats spent a fortune trying to keep locked away. Jesse Watters played the receipts: a full decade ago, while he was still VP, Biden was already a blithering mess who couldn’t even remember the names of his own staff. This is the cognitive decline they gaslit the entire country about for years. This is why Special Counsel Hur called him a “sympathetic elderly man with a poor memory” to dodge charges. The tapes prove it started way earlier — and they knew. They covered it. They protected it. They let an incapacitated man sit in the Oval while the media lied to your face. No more hiding. The truth is out in full.
- Sep 16, 202638x their median
Come on, push me! 🤣 https://t.co/Sb4RLOsrkp
- Sep 18, 202628x their median
What song do you think was playing in the background? 🎶 https://t.co/Hu1Oqdz1n4
- Sep 15, 202623x their median
How cute is this 😍 https://t.co/evoXGX73NT
- Sep 5, 202614x their median
Seattle has gone to hell. It use to be so beautiful downtown. Use to ride the ferry over and we would spend the day walking around eating and shopping. Now it's a dump and the stores have left 🙄 https://t.co/4zlA1NDVWB
- Sep 15, 202613x their median
He knew what was coming 🤣 https://t.co/VSyr1SrnuT
- Oct 17, 202612x their median
If you're in Oregon, you'd better vote for this smoking hot redhead with the big brain. Christine Drazen has the best shot at saving Oregon. She can actually win, too! Let's go @ChristineDrazan! https://t.co/5isZBh8xct
- Sep 11, 20268.6x their median
She speaks the truth 🙌 https://t.co/MKEubrsWyr
- Sep 16, 20268.3x their median
Total perfection 10/10 🤩 https://t.co/WJ0Aj7XMBq
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 252 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.
- What is Brian4new's engagement rate on X?
- Brian4new (@GustBrian) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 296,364 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.085%, Brian4new sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,597 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GustBrian have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GustBrian post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.