Back to @Hoang_HQ's profile

π—§π—Άπ—Ίπ—²π—Ήπ—²π˜€π˜€ π— π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—° ✨🎡 engagement report

@Hoang_HQ - 466K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 466K followers
Per impression
1.24%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
4.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
253
interactions (median)
Saved
0.157%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 253 interactions against 466K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 4,293 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #malehumor.

Compared with accounts its own size

π—§π—Άπ—Ίπ—²π—Ήπ—²π˜€π˜€ π— π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—° ✨🎡's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,293 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, π—§π—Άπ—Ίπ—²π—Ήπ—²π˜€π˜€ π— π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—° ✨🎡 sits above the 25th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.013% to 0.083%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.446%
p902.07%
p99143.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,462 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 89,920 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.446%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%48K
06:00 UTC-5%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%99K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%112K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%97K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%254K
Monday+2%326K
Tuesday-2%350K
Wednesday-4%312K
Thursday-2%265K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%248K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 2026148x their median

    I’m violently laughing 🀣 https://t.co/rGhjN3ahrM

    34K3.1K3582842.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.5x their median

    There’s something remarkably clever about pairing a cello with a classical guitar that most people completely gloss over. Technically speaking, a cello should easily overpower an acoustic guitar. Its deep body and massive natural resonance can swallow up lighter plucked strings in a heartbeat. But what makes this arrangement of "Scarborough Fair" work so well is how they control their frequency space. The guitar stays remarkably tight, anchoring both the rhythmic foundation and those crisp high-mids to keep the arrangement glued together. Meanwhile, the cello refrains from bullying its way through the low end, gliding instead with smooth legato phrasing like a lead vocalist. They simply give each other room to breathe. It’s a neat little reminder for creative work in general: making someone else sound good doesn't mean shrinking your own presenceβ€”it just means knowing when to leave space.

    1.9K407472960K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20258.3x their median

    🩷 The moment you’ve been waiting for... Beautiful, breathtaking, and timelessβ€”don’t miss your chance to experience 5000 years of divine history with Shen Yun! 🩷 Make Shen Yun the highlight of your 2026! ======= πŸ’« Mark your calendars and book your tickets now: https://t.co/nuHxXBV0AT πŸ’« Watch More: https://t.co/VGmAwtMtc0

    1.7K242104211.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.7x their median

    Raw power meets liquid grace. 🌊⚑ People see a 2-second flip, but they miss the real mechanics: - The explosive launch off the board - Perfect aerial control in mid-air - Zero-drag entry into the water Elite athleticism isn't just about forceβ€”it's about making extreme effort look weightless. Rate this execution 1–10. πŸ‘‡

    1.8K85246598K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20266.5x their median

    Did you know? The Kookaburra’s iconic 'laugh' has been used as stock jungle sound effects in hundreds of famous movies. Sounds super familiar, right? πŸ¦œπŸ”Š https://t.co/tB01chBW8V

    1.4K239281369K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.0x their median

    The generation who truly grew up with MJ ✨πŸ”₯ https://t.co/2N05jLDNOy

    1.1K10019964K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.8x their median

    True heroism isn’t the absence of fearβ€”it’s feeling the paralyzing fear and choosing to leap anyway. πŸŒ‰πŸ’§ When 31-year-old delivery driver Peng Qinglin saw a drowning woman in the Qiantang River, he didn't hesitate to help. But if you watch the video closely, you’ll notice something profoundly human: right before he jumped off that 40-foot bridge, his body froze for a split second. He was terrified. His instincts were screaming at him about the deadly height and the turbulent water below. Yet, he looked at a stranger in distress, put his own life on the line, and took the leap. He risked everythingβ€”his safety, his future, his very survivalβ€”for someone he had never met. In a world where many would just pull out a phone to record, Peng chose self-sacrifice. He didn't wear a cape; he wore a delivery uniform. This is the ultimate testament to human selflessness and courage. Real heroes walk among us every day. Respect to a true living legend! 🫑❀️

    1.1K12615257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.9x their median

    When television still knew how to put on a real spectacle.✨ On April 27, 1975, The Cher Show delivered three minutes of pure pop-culture alchemy. Cher and Tina Turner taking the stage for "Shame, Shame, Shame" wasn't just a musical collaborationβ€”it was a masterclass in visual storytelling, female empowerment, and high-fashion synergy. At the center of it all was the legendary Bob Mackie. Rather than dressing them in contrasting styles, Mackie crafted sister silhouettes that celebrated two distinct forces of nature. Both wore shimmering halter-neck gowns encrusted with sequins, finished with dramatic high slits and floor-grazing fringe designed specifically to catch light and catch movement. Cher’s piece featured a magenta and deep pink palette with sharp vertical beadwork that amplified her towering, statuesque frame, topped off with her iconic dark bob. Tina, meanwhile, turned up the heat in rich electric blue and turquoise tones, her signature tawny hair flowing naturally as she moved. The fringed skirts weren't just decorative; they acted as musical instruments of their own, accentuating every shimmy, swivel, and step on that striped disco platform. What makes this performance immortal isn't just the raw vocal power, but the unspoken trust and shared stage presence between two icons at the peak of their confidence. In an era before auto-tune and hyper-edited stage productions, this was pure talent wrapped in brilliant costume design. Fashion history was made right here. 🌟✨ #Cher #TinaTurner #BobMackie #70sFashion #VintageTV #FashionHistory

    81913519939K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.4x their median

    Learning the story behind Freddie Mercury’s 1988 "How Can I Go On" performance with Montserrat CaballΓ© completely changes how you listen to it. This was actually Freddie’s final live public performance. He was secretly battling AIDS, his body was failing him, and he knew his time was running out. Yet, he stood under those Barcelona lights and delivered every line with unmatched grace and vulnerability. Knowing that context turns the lyrics "How can I go on?" from a beautiful ballad into a heartbreaking, real-time reflection of a man facing his own mortality. He wasn't just singing; he was pouring whatever life he had left into that stage. A legendary artist pushing through his darkest hours just to create something immortal. Pure resilience. #FreddieMercury #Queen #MontserratCaballe #HowCanIGoOn #LiveMusic

    72212419725K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.3x their median

    That is awesome 🫢🫢🫢 https://t.co/UMLT0XDLfT

    7884561102K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#malehumor

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 253 interactions against 466K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 4,293 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

What is π—§π—Άπ—Ίπ—²π—Ήπ—²π˜€π˜€ π— π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—° ✨🎡's engagement rate on X?
π—§π—Άπ—Ίπ—²π—Ήπ—²π˜€π˜€ π— π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—° ✨🎡 (@Hoang_HQ) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 466,312 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, π—§π—Άπ—Ίπ—²π—Ήπ—²π˜€π˜€ π— π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—° ✨🎡 sits above the 25th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Hoang_HQ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,293 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Hoang_HQ post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going