Back to @IHRF_English's profile

International Human Rights Foundation engagement report

@IHRF_English - 880K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.009%
of 880K followers
Per impression
0.767%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
1.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
81
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Saturday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 880K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.767% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 654x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ceuta, #morocco, #spain. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #ceuta, #morocco, #spain.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, International Human Rights Foundation sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 23, 2026654x their median

    OUTRAGEOUS! In front of their families and the entire Basque press, our Flotilla volunteers were attacked by the airport police in Bilbao, Basque Country-Spain, upon returning to their home country. https://t.co/CinNouZYjo

    30K16K5.2K8591.6M viewsView on X
  • May 30, 2026413x their median

    Public outrage is growing in the Netherlands after footage appeared to show a police officer violently throwing a reportedly pregnant woman to the ground during an arrest, sparking scrutiny of police use of force. https://t.co/YGYuJGWBJT

    19K7.7K834370817K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 2026279x their median

    “If the USA didn't want other Countries citizens in the US they shouldn't have bid for the Fifa world cup 2026” Didier Drogba https://t.co/95cL1kvPS0

    18K4.0K31676218K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 2026274x their median

    Colombia salva vidas en Venezuela. Todo el apoyo que podamos. Está es la hora del desbloqueo de Venezuela, presidente Donald Trump. https://t.co/gaAZNDyW30

    17K3.9K1.6K185492K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026169x their median

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) Condemns Shameful Life Sentence for Dr. Mahrang Baloch and Sibghatullah Shah by Pakistani Authorities The Hague, The Netherlands – June 23, 2026 – The International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) expresses its strongest condemnation regarding the reprehensible life sentence handed down by a Pakistani Anti-Terrorism Court to prominent human rights defender Dr. Mahrang Baloch and her colleague, Sibghatullah Shah . This verdict is a blatant miscarriage of justice and a devastating blow to the rule of law in Pakistan. Dr. Baloch, a leader of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), has been a fearless and peaceful voice for the Baloch people, courageously campaigning against enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and state repression in Balochistan . Her only crime is her dedication to exposing grave human rights violations . The IHRF is deeply alarmed by the egregious procedural irregularities and denial of due process that characterized this “secret trial” . A proceeding that denies the accused the right to effectively cross-examine witnesses or present a proper defense, held in a “faceless court” on jail premises, cannot be considered a legitimate judicial process . This is not justice; it is a politically motivated weaponization of the judicial system to silence dissent and intimidate human rights defenders . We echo the calls of Amnesty International and other international bodies, who have condemned this verdict as an affront to the right to a fair trial . The state’s cynical misuse of anti-terrorism laws to prosecute peaceful activism represents a dangerous escalation in the crackdown on fundamental freedoms in Pakistan . The IHRF urges the Government of Pakistan to immediately and unconditionally release Dr. Mahrang Baloch and Sibghatullah Shah, and to ensure their safety and well-being. We call upon the international community, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, to: 1. Denounce this injustice and place Pakistan under close scrutiny for its escalating human rights violations. 2. Demand transparency in all legal proceedings against human rights defenders and a full investigation into the circumstances of this case. 3. Pressure Pakistani authorities to cease the persecution of peaceful activists and uphold their international obligations regarding due process and fundamental rights. The IHRF stands in solidarity with Dr. Mahrang Baloch, Sibghatullah Shah, and all peaceful activists in Pakistan who risk their lives for justice and human dignity.

    9.3K3.8K368145159K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 202647x their median

    Inauguramos la nueva sede de ONU Turismo con la huella de Miró en su fachada y, pronto, con una obra de Canogar. Pasado y futuro en un mismo edificio: un puente entre épocas. Como España, refugio del multilateralismo. Espacio de encuentro, diálogo y cooperación entre naciones. https://t.co/ms0YHsldKJ

    2.4K65868439100K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 202636x their median

    International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) Urgent Statement on Pakistan-Administered Kashmir For Immediate Release The International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) condemns in the strongest terms the Pakistani authorities' violent crackdown on peaceful protesters in Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir, which has resulted in over 32 civilian deaths, including at least one woman, between June 8 and 16, 2026 . Escalation and Repression The crisis was precipitated when authorities designated the Jammu and Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC)—a civil society movement advocating for political and economic rights—as a "proscribed organisation" under anti-terrorism laws on June 5 . This was followed by: · Complete suspension of internet and mobile networks across the region · Deployment of federal paramilitary troops · Mass arbitrary arrests of over 100 activists and leaders · Travel restrictions barring outsiders from entering the region · Arrest of journalist Sohrab Barkat under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act The IHRF has documented a recurring pattern of deadly crackdowns on JKJAAC protests, including violence in May 2024 and October 2025 that claimed multiple lives . A Pattern of Systemic Violations This crackdown is not an isolated incident but reflects systemic human rights violations in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Despite nominal autonomy, residents are denied meaningful political representation—excluded from Pakistan's National Assembly—and political dissent is routinely suppressed through arbitrary detention, harassment, and violence . The denial of fundamental rights, including freedom of expression, assembly, and association, violates Articles 19, 21, and 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Pakistan is a signatory . Demands The IHRF urgently calls upon: 1. The Government of Pakistan and AJK Administration to immediately halt all use of deadly force against peaceful protesters, lift the internet shutdown, release all individuals arbitrarily detained, and lift the unlawful ban on JKJAAC 2. An Independent and Impartial Investigation into all civilian deaths, with full access for international observers, and ensure accountability for those responsible for unlawful use of force, including the alleged extrajudicial killing of activist Shahzeb Habib 3. Restoration of Communications and immediate reinstatement of internet and mobile services across the region 4. The International Community to pressure Pakistan to uphold its international human rights obligations and ensure protection of fundamental freedoms for all people in the territory it administers The 2026 Regional Elections Context Holding regional elections on July 27, 2026, while the territory's leading civil movement is outlawed, its leaders jailed, and communications blacked out, would be incompatible with Pakistan's international human rights obligations . The IHRF calls on authorities to facilitate peaceful assemblies ahead of the announced elections . "Branding a civil society body as 'terrorist' on vague grounds, while simultaneously sealing the region from outside scrutiny, constitutes a disproportionate and unlawful violation of the right to freedom of association" . -END- --- The International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) is a non-governmental organization in special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, dedicated to the protection and promotion of human rights worldwide.

    1.8K9461215843K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202636x their median

    Vice President of European Commission @kajakallas told me that Pakistan needs to improve the human rights situation because it is benefiting from GSP plus status and this status is linked with 27 international conventions,the monitoring report about Pakistan will come next month. https://t.co/phWuD9tKyp

    2.4K30617838192K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202631x their median

    🚨🇨🇴 BREAKING — CEPEDA: "885,000 Irregularities Must Be Investigated; Foreign Governments Are Interfering In Colombia's Election." https://t.co/YvidMvRIrY

    2.0K417241551K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 202628x their median

    Statement for the International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) Date: June 9, 2026 Subject: Pakistan: Designation of Peaceful Protest Movement as “Terrorist” Organization Marks Dangerous Escalation in Jammu and Kashmir Crackdown The International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) strongly condemns the Pakistani authorities’ violent and sweeping crackdown on peaceful protests in Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir, which has included an internet shutdown, mass arbitrary arrests, and the deadly use of force. This escalation represents a grave deterioration of human rights in the region. On June 5, 2026, regional authorities issued a notification designating the Jammu and Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC)—a grassroots movement advocating for the economic and political rights of the local population—as a “proscribed organization” under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Anti-Terrorism Act, 2014. Branding a civil society body as “terrorist” on vague grounds, while simultaneously sealing the region from outside scrutiny, constitutes a disproportionate and unlawful violation of the right to freedom of association. Concurrent actions—including the suspension of all internet and mobile networks until June 12, a travel advisory ordering outsiders to leave the region, and the deployment of federal paramilitary troops—have effectively sealed Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir, severely impeding the flow of information and reports of abuses. Journalists covering the protests, such as Sohrab Barkat, have been arrested under electronic crimes laws for allegedly “promoting” the JKJAAC. The crackdown has turned lethal. On the night of June 5, activist Shahzeb Habib was shot during an encounter with police under circumstances that suggest no imminent threat to officers; he later died from his injuries. On June 7, following the transfer of his body for autopsy, clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Rawalakot resulted in the deaths of at least eight protesters and four police officers, with dozens more injured on both sides. On 8th and 9th June 2026, reportedly more than 25 people, including a woman have been killed by the Pakistani security forces. The IHRF calls for: 1. An independent, transparent inquiry into the alleged extrajudicial killing of Shahzeb Habib and all unlawful deaths of protesters and police officers in Rawalakot, with those responsible held accountable in line with international human rights standards. 2. Immediate de-escalation and strict adherence to international principles on the use of force—only as a last resort, and with necessity and proportionality. 3. The immediate lifting of the unlawful ban on the JKJAAC and the restoration of internet and mobile networks, as well as freedom of peaceful assembly and association. 4. Urgent steps to facilitate peaceful assemblies ahead of the announced regional elections on July 27, 2026, in compliance with Pakistan’s international human rights obligations. The International Human Rights Foundation remains deeply concerned by the recurring pattern of crackdowns on JKJAAC protests, including deadly violence in May 2024 and October 2025. Without prompt corrective action, the authorities risk further loss of life and a complete erosion of fundamental rights in the region. Issued by the International Human Rights Foundation (IHRF) June 9, 2026

    1.5K720744034K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ceuta#morocco#spain

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 880K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.767% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 654x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ceuta, #morocco, #spain. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is International Human Rights Foundation's engagement rate on X?
International Human Rights Foundation (@IHRF_English) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 880,321 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, International Human Rights Foundation sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IHRF_English have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @IHRF_English post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going