Back to @IfindRetards's profile

Retard Finder engagement report

@IfindRetards - 901K followers on X

Measured over 93 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.918%
of 901K followers
Per impression
8.98%
92K views on a typical post
Reach
10.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
62 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.83/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 8.3K interactions against 901K followers, an engagement rate of 0.918%. Measured over 93 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 8.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 93 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 89K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 93 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Retard Finder's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.918%, Retard Finder sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    We need a slur for liberal white women, retard doesn't cut it anymore.

    81K3.2K4.6K2431.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.2x their median

    Retards will cut their own tits or dicks off, demand you call them a different name and use different pronouns, then say renaming a lake crosses the line. Retard world.

    60K6.4K547230713K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.8x their median

    Retarded quote of the day 🥇 https://t.co/mhp8t5zRGv

    58K4.2K1.4K215569K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.4x their median

    For being obsessed with the size of Nick Shirley's penis. Retard of the day, Terry Schanz. https://t.co/Nls96taQ42

    51K7.7K2.5K323262K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.2x their median

    Nick Shirley destroys this loser who approached him with a flyer reading “Allegedly Nick Shirley has a small penis, prove me wrong" Apparently this retard is the California State Assembly Chief of Staff. What kind of cringe, immature shit is this? https://t.co/ekJgjn1bxY

    42K6.3K2.2K400913K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.2x their median

    There is nothing even remotely controversial about this T-shirt, and if you think there is, you're retarded. https://t.co/46VPYA5qb5

    46K4.5K37287314K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.1x their median

    If you support a woman who admitted to strangling her three children to death with exercise bands, you're a sick retard.

    47K3.3K25758363K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.5x their median

    New Profile banner just dropped https://t.co/KvOoYFQR28

    43K1.7K29925297K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.8x their median

    Being punctual is racist. https://t.co/HZl995L2n0

    33K4.2K1.7K617754K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.7x their median

    They kill babies, support child killers, and mock murder, then call you violent fascists. The retards are out of control. https://t.co/Qxfz3G2kXh

    34K4.2K49589322K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8.3K interactions against 901K followers, an engagement rate of 0.918%. Measured over 93 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 8.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 93 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 89K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Retard Finder's engagement rate on X?
Retard Finder (@IfindRetards) has an engagement rate of 0.918%, based on the median interactions across 93 original posts from the last 30 days against 901,332 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.918%, Retard Finder sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IfindRetards have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IfindRetards post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going