Kate πͺ¬π€πΊπΈ engagement report
@ImSpeaking13 - 159K followers on X
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 640x its own typical post.
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kate πͺ¬π€πΊπΈ's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Kate πͺ¬π€πΊπΈ sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,920 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.706% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 5% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 29, 2023640x their median
Guide to Kate for new friends 1. βFuckβ is my passion word 2. I enjoy helping racists delete their accounts 3. Matt Gaetzβs wife called me a snowflake, Kirstie Alley hated me and I used Bumble to report insurrectionists to the FBI 4. Women are coming for the GOP in 2024β³
- Sep 21, 202665x their median
https://t.co/lYAWKoov9P
- Sep 21, 202635x their median
For 2 years she sat in silence and took it. It only escalated. https://t.co/BuAhfvjNdF
- Sep 25, 202633x their median
This sums up my existence. https://t.co/SiPxso9IPX
- Sep 21, 202626x their median
https://t.co/wockp02Hzs
- Sep 21, 202624x their median
https://t.co/2FVKL8gxK7
- Oct 26, 202615x their median
Refusing to acknowledge the massive amount of harm and damage you did to an innocent person does not make that harm or damage go away. They still have to live with it, and you will still have to acknowledge it.
- Sep 21, 202612x their median
https://t.co/JHA443rbI8
- Oct 26, 202611x their median
Every single day for four years they kept her pumped full of cortisol and adrenaline, lied about her behavior, triggered her on purpose, and tried to give her permanent stank face when she always used to be smiling.
- Sep 21, 202610x their median
His/her/their https://t.co/Y8JmMNQsNS
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 640x its own typical post.
- What is Kate πͺ¬π€πΊπΈ's engagement rate on X?
- Kate πͺ¬π€πΊπΈ (@ImSpeaking13) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,548 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Kate πͺ¬π€πΊπΈ sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,920 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ImSpeaking13 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ImSpeaking13 post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.