Back to @IncomeSharks's profile

IncomeSharks engagement report

@IncomeSharks - 742K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.063%
of 742K followers
Per impression
0.748%
63K views on a typical post
Reach
8.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
468
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 468 interactions against 742K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 63K times each, and 0.748% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

IncomeSharks's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.063%, IncomeSharks sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20264.0x their median

    $ETH - Kind of a similar setup as last time if this is the bottom. Would be happy for an acceleration straight to $3k but consolidation would actually be bullish to build a new base. This is usually how the market gets people to close longs before the next move up by chopping. https://t.co/PgWrI1Rsyp

    1.7K117923412K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.8x their median

    Nice to see half a trillion dollars show up in the crypto market in a matter of weeks. The pattern clearly broken and if the red line breaks out I don't think there's any way you can still be skeptical of the move. https://t.co/QHaBc824Cd

    1.6K92747104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.1x their median

    Crypto has my attention again but the reality is without continuation this pump means nothing other than short term excitement. Stocks make moves like this daily so in order to get liquidity back it needs to accelerate here not stall/retrace. ETF inflows a great sign though.

    1.4K3466189K viewsView on X
  • Mar 24, 20263.0x their median

    I'm looking forward to one of the months this year where crypto will be up only and make up for the suffering it puts us through. Then it'll be boring for months after and people will overtrade and give back profits but it'll be a great time.

    1.3K38763117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.9x their median

    Don't waste time mourning missed opportunities or losses. Traders that live in the past will never have a successful future. Miss 99 opportunities? Who cares, you could retire on the 100th opportunity you take.

    1.2K113441490K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.8x their median

    Best guess for the next round of squiggles for Bitcoin. Seems we can't seem to break the pattern of breakouts, re-tests then mean revisions to diagonals. We are still not see capital being injected into crypto, it's still rotation for now. https://t.co/gpPa4U4zHx

    1.1K87827450K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20262.8x their median

    Total crypto marketcap losing support. Running out of lines to help stop it. Adding lines to wicks, candle bodies, and anything else I can to slow it down. https://t.co/vzjWZze0tk

    1.1K571264384K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.7x their median

    There's a lot of money on Robinhood. Focus on altcoins that are listed there. https://t.co/UGEiXtTOZU

    94123370390K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.4x their median

    $VIRTUAL and $INJ are some of the only coins I've seen that are trading like top 100 coins volume wise without being in the top 100. I think $INJ just crossed into the top 100 but at entry it was not as it's climbed another 10% since. A good way to handpick altcoins by volume. https://t.co/WnPFv8ymnt

    83222859483K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.4x their median

    You expect to get rugged in crypto, not in real estate. https://t.co/7o8YPXwLIo

    884142230113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 468 interactions against 742K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 63K times each, and 0.748% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

What is IncomeSharks's engagement rate on X?
IncomeSharks (@IncomeSharks) has an engagement rate of 0.063%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 741,956 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.063%, IncomeSharks sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IncomeSharks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IncomeSharks post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going