Back to @IsabelOakeshott's profile

Isabel Oakeshott engagement report

@IsabelOakeshott - 407K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.792%
of 407K followers
Per impression
1.79%
179K views on a typical post
Reach
44.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 407K followers, an engagement rate of 0.792%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 179K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 44.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 7.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Isabel Oakeshott's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.792%, Isabel Oakeshott sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.435% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 20247.4x their median

    ‼️I spent the day in Leeds, in the area where the riots kicked off. The absolute state of our country ☢️ ⚠️ 😢 https://t.co/qErkTNIiTJ

    14K2.6K5.8K1.6K8.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.5x their median

    Lefties furious at stunning result for @Nigel_Farage who outmanoeuvred them again by denying them the opportunity to stage stupid stunts at the count. They look extraordinarily foolish today.

    3.8K4883.5K308798K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    EMBARRASSED by our undercover investigation, the Home Office calls me and @EnglishmanTalks "reckless." Privately, they rightly want our intelligence on Channel migrants. We'll keep going. Please support our work - it's difficult and dangerous @watchman_raw

    6.3K1.3K2002595K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.2x their median

    NOBODY at the top of @reformparty_uk thought a by-election win in Clacton would end the witch-hunt. Instead, it allows @Nigel_Farage to say that the people who sent him to Westminster in the first place still want him there. As do millions of others.

    5.0K7531.2K92192K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.1x their median

    Can't wait to see how many fit and well Universal Credit claimants suddenly find work, rather than be forced to clean the streets in return for their benefits. Under @reformparty_uk no more something for nothing! Long overdue. Labour first proposed this under Blair, but chickened out

    4.7K5701.4K102203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Why do @Nigel_Farage haters continue to question the constant threat to his life? How much evidence do they need? Is the bludgeoning to death of Ann Widdecombe not enough? Or the fact that counter terror police now link that murder to a serious incident at his property? Do we REALLY have to spell this out for you?

    3.3K59071150106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    🚨🚨🚨"Exclusive for Talk, Christian Drogan becomes the first man to invade his own country." TALK EXCLUSIVE, Isabel Oakeshott reveals the first ever covert reporter to cross the English channel on a migrant dinghy revealing the horror behind the crossings. @IsabelOakeshott https://t.co/eIdIHiSCZa

    2.8K83712549288K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Reform sources privately acknowledging Nigel Farage's decision not to attend the count was a bad mistake.

    1.7K20058452204K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    When I read Reforms new welfare policy, i thought immediately about my mum She is severely disabled. She has severe autism, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, heart problems & a long list of other lifelong conditions. She cannot work. She will never be able to work. She also struggles to communicate how much care she actually needs. She can get on a bus & go looking for mushrooms (which she loves) but that tiny glimpse of independence tells you almost nothing about how vulnerable she really is She has been taken to hospital more than 15 times this summer alone after her legs gave way or she became unwell in the heat. Yet she is humiliatingly repeatedly asked to prove the extent of disabilities that are NEVER going away This is why I support Reform’s approach. The welfare state should provide security for people with severe & enduring disabilities like my mum, while properly assessing those with conditions from which they can recover or with which they are capable of working

    2.1K1602198167K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    🛑WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Working with me, investigative reporter Christian Drogan @watchman_raw becomes the first British man to cross the Channel in a migrant dinghy. MEDIA WARNING: All images and video COPYRIGHT -contact @IsabelOakeshott Full exclusive later today on @TalkTV

    1.5K38518922324K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 407K followers, an engagement rate of 0.792%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 179K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 44.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 7.4x its own typical post.

What is Isabel Oakeshott's engagement rate on X?
Isabel Oakeshott (@IsabelOakeshott) has an engagement rate of 0.792%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 406,619 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.792%, Isabel Oakeshott sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IsabelOakeshott have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IsabelOakeshott post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going