Etienne Arsenault engagement report
@JETAR9 - 1.7M followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.309% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.168% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 69% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 2199x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #buddha, #blessings, #lovelife.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #buddha, #blessings, #lovelife.
Compared with accounts its own size
Etienne Arsenault's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Etienne Arsenault sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Mar 16, 20152199x their median
Life is a Gorgeous Rose Life without thorns is not Life but Heaven on Earth A Pure Mind Strips the THORNS off Life http://t.co/27DvX8ffnn
- Aug 5, 20264.1x their median
The path to peace is walked one mindful step at a time. There is no shortcut to inner freedom. https://t.co/vm5Z0u0Nlw
- Jul 29, 20262.2x their median
|â INSIGHT € PROFOUND VISION € ONE TRUTH â| đ La Version Française est publiĂ©e ci-dessous aprĂšs la Version Anglaise. đ Buddhaâs Teachings Samyutta Nikaya, LVI (XII).ii An Analysis of Dependent Co-arising Vibhaáč ga Sutta (SN 12:2) /ENG đ„SEE-READ the TEXT-IMAGE In the posted Image or down belowđ„ â Now which aging-&-death? Whatever aging, decrepitude, brokenness, graying, wrinkling, decline of life-force, weakening of the faculties of the various beings in this or that group of beings, that is called aging. Whatever deceasing, passing away, breaking up, disappearance, dying, death, completion of time, break up of the aggregates, casting off of the body, interruption in the life faculty of the various beings in this or that group of beings, that is called death. âAnd which birth? Whatever birth, taking birth, descent, coming-to-be, coming-forth, appearance of aggregates, & acquisition of (sense) media of the various beings in this or that group of beings, that is called birth. âAnd which becoming? These three becomings: sensual becoming, form becoming, & formless becoming. This is called becoming. âAnd which clinging/sustenance? These four are clingings: sensuality-clinging, view-clinging, habit-&-practice-clinging, and doctrine-of-self-clinging. This is called clinging. [Or: These four are sustenances: sensuality-sustenance, view-sustenance, habit-&-practice-sustenance, and doctrine-of-self-sustenance.] âAnd which craving? These six are classes of craving: craving for forms, craving for sounds, craving for smells, craving for tastes, craving for tactile sensations, craving for ideas. This is called craving. âAnd which feeling? These six are classes of feeling: feeling born from eye-contact, feeling born from ear-contact, feeling born from nose-contact, feeling born from tongue-contact, feeling born from body-contact, feeling born from intellect-contact. This is called feeling. âAnd which contact? These six are classes of contact: eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, intellect-contact. This is called contact. âAnd which six sense media? These six are sense media: the eye-medium, the ear-medium, the nose-medium, the tongue-medium, the body-medium, the intellect-medium. These are called the six sense media. âAnd which name-&-form? Feeling, perception, intention, contact, & attention: This is called name. The four great elements, and the form dependent on the four great elements: This is called form. This name & this form are called name-&-form. âAnd which consciousness? These six are classes of consciousness: eye-consciousness, ear-consciousness, nose-consciousness, tongue-consciousness, body-consciousness, intellect-consciousness. This is called consciousness. âAnd which fabrications? These three are fabrications: bodily fabrications, verbal fabrications, mental fabrications. These are called fabrications. đ„ âAnd which ignorance? Not knowing stress, not knowing the origination of stress, not knowing the cessation of stress, not knowing the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: This is called ignorance. #Buddha |âMindfulness €Self Mastery €Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â| Bouddha âââ /FR |â INSIGHT € VISION PROFONDE € UNE VĂRITĂ â| Enseignement du Bouddha Vibhaáč ga 12.2 Analyse de la co-production conditionnĂ©e đ„ VOIR-LIRE le - TEXTE-IMAGE Dans lâimage publiĂ©e ou ci-dessousđ„ âOr donc, qu'est-ce que la vieillesse et la mort? Tout ce qui est vieillesse, dĂ©crĂ©pitude, fourbure, grisonnance, rides, dĂ©clin de la force vitale, affaiblissement des facultĂ©s des diffĂ©rents ĂȘtres en ce groupe d'ĂȘtres-ci ou ce groupe d'ĂȘtres-lĂ , voilĂ ce qu'on appelle vieillesse. Tout ce qui est dĂ©cĂšs, trĂ©pas, rupture, disparition, mourir, la mort, avoir fait son temps, dissolution des agrĂ©gats, dĂ©pouillement du corps, interruption dans la facultĂ© vitale des diffĂ©rents ĂȘtres en ce groupe d'ĂȘtres-ci ou ce groupe d'ĂȘtres-lĂ , voilĂ ce qu'on appelle la mort. âEt qu'est-ce que la naissance? Tout ce qui est naissance, prendre naissance, descendre, venir Ă ĂȘtre, s'avancer,đ„apparition des agrĂ©gats, et acquisition des mĂ©diums [des sens] des diffĂ©rents ĂȘtres en ce groupe d'ĂȘtres-ci ou ce groupe d'ĂȘtres-lĂ , voilĂ ce qu'on appelle la naissance. âEt qu'est-ce que le devenir? Ces trois sont le devenir: le devenir sensoriel, le devenir de la forme, et le devenir sans forme. VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle le devenir. âEt qu'est-ce que l'attachement/alimentation? Ces quatre sont les attachements: l'attachement Ă la sensualitĂ©, l'attachement aux vues, l'attachement aux prĂ©ceptes et Ă la pratique, et l'attachement Ă la doctrine du soi. VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle l'attachement. âEt qu'est-ce que l'envie insatiable? Ces sixsont des classes de l'envie insatiable: l'envie insatiable des formes, l'envie insatiable des sons, l'envie insatiable des odeurs, l'envie insatiable des goĂ»ts, l'envie insatiable des sensations tactiles, l'envie insatiable des idĂ©es. VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle l'envie insatiable. âEt qu'est-ce que la sensation? Ces six sont des classes de sensations: la sensation nĂ©e du contact avec l'oeil, la sensation nĂ©e du contact avec l'oreille, la sensation nĂ©e du contact avec le nez, la sensation nĂ©e du contact avec la langue,đ„la sensation nĂ©e du contact avec le corps, la sensation nĂ©e du contact avec l'intellect. VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle la sensation. âEt qu'est-ce que le contact? Ces six sont des classes de contact: le contact avec l'oeil, le contact avec l'oreille, le contact avec le nez, le contact avec la langue, le contact avec le corps, le contact avec l'intellect. VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle le contact. âEt que sont les mĂ©diums des six sens? Ces six sont des mĂ©diums des sens: le mĂ©dium de l'oeil, le mĂ©dium de l'oreille, le mĂ©dium du nez, le mĂ©dium de la langue, le mĂ©dium du corps, le mĂ©dium de l'intellect. On les appelle les mĂ©dias des six sens. âEt qu'est-ce que le nom-et-forme? Sensation, perception, intention, contact, et attention: VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle le nom. Les quatre grands Ă©lĂ©ments, et la forme dĂ©pendant des quatre grands Ă©lĂ©ments: VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle la forme. Ce nom et cette forme sont appelĂ©s le nom-et-forme. âEt qu'est-ce que la conscience? Ces six sont des classes de la conscience: la conscience de l'oeil, la conscience de l'oreille, la conscience du nez, la conscience de la langue, la conscience du corps, la conscience de l'intellect. VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle la conscience. đ„ âEt que sont les fabrications? Ces trois sont les fabrications: les fabrications corporelles, les fabrications verbales, les fabrications mentales. On les appelle les fabrications. âEt qu'est-ce que l'ignorance? Ne pas connaĂźtre le stress, ne pas connaĂźtre l'origine du stress, ne pas connaĂźtre la cessation du stress, ne pas connaĂźtre le mode de pratique conduisant Ă la cessation du stress: VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle l'ignorance. #Bouddha |â Pleine Conscience € MaĂźtrise de Soi € SpiritualitĂ© € ClartĂ© Mentale € Non-attachement (dĂ©tachement) â| âââ ENG đ„ TEXT-IMAGEđ„ AND WHICH IGNORANCE? Not knowing stress, not knowing the origination of stress, not knowing the cessation of stress, not knowing the way of practice leading to the cessation of stress: This is called ignorance. (bis) And what is dependent co-arising? From ignorance as a requisite condition come fabrications. From fabrications as a requisite condition comes consciousness. From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-&-form. From name-&-form as a requisite condition come the six sense media. From the six sense media as a requisite condition comes contact. From contact as a requisite condition comes feeling. đ„ From feeling as a requisite condition comes craving. From craving as a requisite condition comes clinging/sustenance. From clinging/sustenance as a requisite condition comes becoming. From becoming as a requisite condition comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, then aging-&-death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair come into play. Such is the origination of this entire mass of stress & suffering. âââ FR đ„ TEXTE-IMAGEđ„ ET QU'EST-CE QUE L'IGNORANCE? Ne pas connaĂźtre le stress, ne pas connaĂźtre l'origine du stress, ne pas connaĂźtre la cessation du stress, ne pas connaĂźtre le mode de pratique conduisant Ă la cessation du stress: VoilĂ ce qu'on appelle l'ignorance. (bis) Et qu'est-ce que la coproduction conditionnĂ©e? De l'ignorance en tant que condition prĂ©-requise proviennent les fabrications. Des fabrications en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient la conscience. De la conscience en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient le nom-et-forme. Du nom-et-forme en tant que condition prĂ©-requise proviennent les mĂ©diums des six sens. Des mĂ©diums des six sens en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient le contact. đ„ Du contact en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient la sensation. De la sensation en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient l'envie insatiable. De l'envie insatiable en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient l'attachement/alimentation. De l'attachement/alimentation en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient le devenir. Du devenir en tant que condition prĂ©-requise provient la naissance. De la naissance en tant que condition prĂ©-requise, entrent ensuite en jeu la vieillesse et la mort, le chagrin, les lamentations, la douleur, l'angoisse, et le dĂ©sespoir. Telle est l'origine de toute cette masse de stress et de souffrance. đ„ âĄïžCont. An Analysis of Dependent Co-arising (SN 12:2) Tomorrowâs Post đ„
- Aug 21, 20261.7x their median
508 đ ENG | Jiddu Krishnamurti đ„ PUBLICATION : New «FORMAT» Nouveau đ„ đ La Version Française du livre de Krishnamurti est publiĂ©e ci-dessous aprĂšs la Version Anglaise đ |â For OPTIMAL UNDERSTANDING Read the text with ATTENTION from the First word to the End â| 5e Public Talk â Freedom From the Known âą Se libĂ©rer du connu â Question ! â What is thinking? â Qu'est-ce que penser? â ââ WHAT IS THINKING?; IDEAS & ACTION; PROVOCATIONS; MATERIAL; THE ORIGIN OF THOUGHT. â Let us now go into the question of what is thinking, the significance of that thought which must be exercised with care, logic and sanity (for our daily work) and that which has no significance at all. Unless we know the two kinds, we cannot possibly understand something much deeper which thought cannot touch. So let us try to understand this whole complex structure of what is thinking, what is memory, how thought originates, how thought conditions all our actions; and in understanding all this we shall perhaps come across something which thought has never discovered, which thought cannot open the door to. âââ TEXTâIMAGE Ref.#508 What is thinking?; Ideas & action; Provocations; Material; The origin of thought. Why has thought become so important in all our lives - thought being ideas, being the response to the accumulated memories in the brain cells? Perhaps many of you have not even asked such a question before, or if you have you may have said, `It's of very little importance - what is important is emotion.' But I don't see how you can separate the two. If thought doesn't give continuity to feeling, feeling dies very quickly. So why in our daily lives, in our grinding, boring, frightened lives, has thought taken on such inordinate importance? Ask yourself as I am asking myself - why is one a slave to thought - cunning, clever, thought which can organize, which can start things, which has invented so much, bred so many wars, created so much fear, so much anxiety, which is forever making images and chasing its own tail - thought which has enjoyed the pleasure of yesterday and given that pleasure continuity in the present and also in the future - thought which is always active, chattering, moving, constructing, taking away, adding, supposing? Ideas have become far more important to us than action - ideas so cleverly expressed in books by the intellectuals in every field. The more cunning, the more subtle, those ideas are the more we worship them and the books that contain them. We are those books, we are those ideas, so heavily conditioned are we by them. We are forever discussing ideas and ideals and dialectically offering opinions. Every religion has its dogma, its formula, its own scaffold to reach the gods, and when inquiring into the beginning of thought we are questioning the importance of this whole edifice of ideas.đ„ We have separated ideas from action because ideas are always of the past and action is always the present - that is, living is always the present. We are afraid of living and therefore the past, as ideas, has become so important to us. [It is really extraordinarily interesting to watch the operation of one's own thinking, just to observe how one thinks, where that reaction we call thinking, springs from. Obviously from memory.] â đïž đ Sadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïž Among others it is used to express shared joy, moral approval, and spiritual agreement. Also means « excellent, well done, or it is good.» - «Amen or Hallelujah» J.K. Krishnamurti |â Mindfulness € Self Mastery € Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â| âđâ đ VERSION FRANĂAISE đ đïžOn LinkedIn « New Post » 508- đ FR | Jiddu Krishnamurti |â Pour une COMPRĂHENSION OPTIMALE, LIRE avec ATTENTION le texte au complet « du DĂ©but Ă la Fin » â| Public Talk 5e Causerie â Freedom From the Known âą Se libĂ©rer du connu â MEDITATION â â QU'EST-CE QUE PENSER? LES IDĂES ET L'ACTION; LES PROVOCATIONS ; LA MATIĂRE ; L'ORIGINE DE LA PENSĂE. â Examinons maintenant en quoi consiste la pensĂ©e, et commençons par distinguer celle que l'on doit exercer sainement, logiquement, avec grand soin, dans la vie quotidienne, de celle qui ne correspond Ă rien. Tant que nous ne serons pas trĂšs avertis de leurs natures, nous ne pourrons pas pĂ©nĂ©trer certaines profondeurs que la pensĂ©e ne peut atteindre. Essayons donc de comprendre l'ensemble de cette structure complexe qu'est la pensĂ©e. Voyons ce qu'est la mĂ©moire, comment la pensĂ©e prend naissance, comment elle conditionne tous nos actes et, en comprenant tout cela, peut-ĂȘtre rencontrerons-nous quelque chose que la pensĂ©e n'a jamais pu dĂ©couvrir, une chose Ă laquelle la pensĂ©e n'a jamais pu ouvrir la porte. âââ TEXTE â IMAGE RĂ©f. #508 Qu'est-ce que penser? les idĂ©es et l'action; les provocations; la matiĂšre; l'origine de la pensĂ©e. Pourquoi la pensĂ©e est-elle devenue si importante dans nos vies ? Je parle de celle qui manipule des idĂ©es, de celle qui n'est pas la rĂ©action de mĂ©moires accumulĂ©es dans les cellules de nos cerveaux. Il se peut que certains d'entre vous ne se soient mĂȘme jamais posĂ© cette question, ou se l'Ă©tant posĂ©e qu'ils l'aient Ă©cartĂ©e comme Ă©tant de peu d'importance, pensant que seule compte l'Ă©motion. Mais je ne vois pas comment on pourrait sĂ©parer les deux. Si la pensĂ©e ne donne pas continuitĂ© au sentiment, celui-ci meurt vite. Pourquoi dans nos vies quotidiennes, dans nos vies assujetties aux labeurs et aux adversitĂ©s, la pensĂ©e a-t-elle pris une importance hors de toute proportion? Demandez-le-vous, comme je me le demande. Pourquoi sommes-nous tributaires de cette pensĂ©e, si rusĂ©e, si habile, si capable d'organiser, de mettre en route, d'inventer des choses, d'engendrer des guerres, de semer la terreur, de susciter les inquiĂ©tudes, de multiplier des images Ă l'infini, de poursuivre des chimĂšres; de cette pensĂ©e qui, ayant joui des plaisirs d'hier, leur donne continuitĂ© dans le prĂ©sent, et aussi dans le futur; de cette pensĂ©e toujours active, bavarde, remuante, qui ne cesse de construire, de dĂ©molir, d'additionner, de supposer? Les idĂ©es sont devenues pour nous beaucoup plus importantes que l'action: les idĂ©es qu'exposent les intellectuels avec tant de talent, sur toutes les questions. Plus elles sont habiles et subtiles, plus nous leur rendons un culte, Ă elles et aux livres qui les contiennent. Nous « sommes » ces idĂ©es, nous « sommes » ces livres, Ă©tant si lourdement conditionnĂ©s par eux. Nous discutons inlassablement d'idĂ©es et d'idĂ©aux, et, dialectiquement, nous offrons nos opinions. đ„ Chaque religion a ses dogmes, ses formules, ses Ă©chafaudages pour atteindre les dieux, et maintenant, alors que nous nous interrogeons sur l'origine de la pensĂ©e, nous contestons l'importance de tout cet Ă©difice. Nous avons sĂ©parĂ© les idĂ©es de l'action, parce qu'elles sont toujours du passĂ© tandis que l'action est toujours du prĂ©sent: vivre est toujours du prĂ©sent. Nous avons peur de vivre, et c'est pour cela que le passĂ©, en tant qu'idĂ©es, est si important pour nous. [En vĂ©ritĂ©, il est extraordinairement intĂ©ressant d'observer la façon dont opĂšre notre pensĂ©e, de simplement voir comment nous pensons et d'oĂč surgit cette action que nous appelons penser. Il est Ă©vident qu'elle a sa source dans la mĂ©moire.] â đïž đ Sadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïž UtilisĂ© entre autres pour exprimer une joie partagĂ©e de dĂ©votion, une approbation des valeurs morales et spirituelles. Aussi une expression dâaccord et dâĂ©loge, signifiant « excellent, bien, bon » â « Amen » ou « AllĂ©luia » J.K. Krishnamurti |â Pleine Conscience € MaĂźtrise de Soi € SpiritualitĂ© € ClartĂ© Mentale € Non-attachement â|
- Aug 16, 20261.6x their median
502 đ ENG | Jiddu Krishnamurti đ„ PUBLICATION : New «FORMAT» Nouveau đ„ đ La Version Française du livre de Krishnamurti est publiĂ©e ci-dessous aprĂšs la Version Anglaise đ |â For OPTIMAL UNDERSTANDING Read the text with ATTENTION from the First word to the End â| Public Talk â This Matter of Culture-Think on These Things/Le sens du bonheur 1963 Dialogue Question Answerâ THE SIMPLICITY OF LOVE /LA SIMPLICITĂ DE LâAMOUR â ââ Q.: if the mind and the brain are one, then why is it that when a thought or an urge arises which the brain tells us is ugly the mind so often goes on with it? â k.: Actually what takes place? If a pin pricks your arm, the nerves carry the sensation to your brain, the brain translates it as pain, then the mind rebels against the pain, and you take away the pin or otherwise do something about it. But there are some things which the mind goes on with, even though it knows them to be ugly or stupid. It knows how essentially stupid it is to smoke, and yet one goes on smoking. Why? Because it likes the sensations of smoking, and that is all. If the mind were as keenly aware of the stupidity of smoking as it is of the pain of a pinprick, it would stop smoking immediately. But it doesn't want to see it that clearly because smoking has become a pleasurable habit. It is the same with greed or violence. âââ TEXT-IMAGE âïžGREED âïžENVY âïžAMBITION AND âïžLUST ARE POISONOUS If greed were as painful to you as the pinprick in your arm, you would instantly stop being greedy, you wouldn't philosophize about it; and if you were really awake to the full significance of violence, you wouldn't write volumes about non-violence - which is all nonsense, because you don't feel it, you just talk about it. If you eat something which gives you a violent tummyache, you don't go on eating it, do you? You put it aside immediately. Similarly, if you once realized that envy and ambition are poisonous, vicious, cruel, as deadly as the sting of a cobra, you would awaken to them. But, you see, the mind does not want to look at these things too closely; in this area it has vested interests, and it refuses to admit that ambition, envy, greed, lust are poisonous. Therefore it says, "Let us discuss non-greed, non-violence, let us have ideals" - and in the meantime it carries on with its poisons. So find out for yourself how corrupting, how destructive and poisonous these things are, and you will soon drop them; but if you merely say, "I must not" and go on as before, you are playing the hypocrite. Be one thing or the other, hot or cold. â đïž đSadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïžAmong others it is used to express shared joy, moral approval, and spiritual agreement. Also means « excellent, well done, or it is good.» - «Amen or Hallelujah» J.K. Krishnamurti |âMindfulness € Self Mastery € Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â| âđâ đ VERSION FRANĂAISE đ đïžOn LinkedIn « New Post » 502- đ FR | Jiddu Krishnamurti |â Pour une COMPRĂHENSION OPTIMALE, LIRE avec ATTENTION le texte au complet « du DĂ©but Ă la Fin » â| Causerie â Le sens du bonheur 1963 Dialogue Question â LA SIMPLICITĂ DE L'AMOUR â ââ Q.: si l'esprit et le cerveau ne font qu'un, pourquoi, lorsque naĂźt une pensĂ©e ou une pulsion jugĂ©es laides par notre cerveau, l'esprit persiste-t-il trĂšs souvent dans la mĂȘme voie? â k.: Que se passe-t-il dans les faits? Si une Ă©pingle pique votre bras, les nerfs transmettent la sensation Ă votre cerveau, celui-ci la traduit sous forme de douleur, puis l'esprit se rĂ©volte contre la douleur, et vous ĂŽtez l'Ă©pingle, ou vous agissez en consĂ©quence. Mais dans certains cas, l'esprit persiste dans la mĂȘme voie, tout en sachant qu'il s'agit de choses laides ou stupides. Il sait Ă quel point il est stupide de fumer, et pourtant on continue Ă fumer. Pourquoi? Parce qu'il aime les sensations que procure le tabac, c'est tout. Si l'esprit Ă©tait aussi intensĂ©ment conscient de la stupiditĂ© du tabagisme qu'il l'est d'une piqĂ»re d'Ă©pingle, on cesserait de fumer immĂ©diatement. Mais il refuse de voir les choses en toute luciditĂ© parce que fumer est devenu une habitude plaisante. Il en va de mĂȘme pour l'aviditĂ© ou la violence. âââ Si l'aviditĂ© Ă©tait aussi douloureuse pour vous que la piqĂ»re d'Ă©pingle dans votre bras, vous cesseriez instantanĂ©ment d'ĂȘtre avide, sans philosopher outre mesure; et si vous Ă©tiez conscient de la signification de la violence, vous n'Ă©cririez pas des volumes entiers sur la non-violence - qui ne sont que fadaises, car vous ne ressentez pas les choses, vous vous contentez d'en parler. Si vous mangez quelque chose qui vous donne de violents maux de ventre, vous ne continuez pas Ă en manger, n'est-ce pas? Vous arrĂȘtez immĂ©diatement. De la mĂȘme façon, si, ne serait-ce qu'une fois, vous vous rendiez compte que l'envie et l'ambition sont nocives, perverses, aussi mortelles que la morsure d'un cobra, vous y seriez attentif. Mais voyez-vous, l'esprit ne tient pas Ă y regarder de trop prĂšs, car ce sont des domaines dans lesquels il est directement intĂ©ressĂ©, et il refuse d'admettre que l'ambition, l'envie, l'aviditĂ©, la convoitise sont des poisons. Il dit donc: « Discutons de la non-aviditĂ©, de la non-violence, ayons des idĂ©aux », et entre-temps il persiste avec ses poisons. DĂ©couvrez donc par vous-mĂȘme Ă quel point ces choses-lĂ sont corruptrices, destructrices, nocives, et vous les abandonnerez trĂšs vite. Mais si vous vous contentez de dire: « Je ne dois pas », et que vous continuez comme par le passĂ©, vous jouez un jeu hypocrite. De deux choses l'une: optez pour le chaud ou le froid. â đïž đ Sadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïž UtilisĂ© entre autres pour exprimer une joie partagĂ©e de dĂ©votion, une approbation des valeurs morales et spirituelles. Aussi une expression dâaccord et dâĂ©loge, signifiant « excellent, bien, bon » â « Amen » ou « AllĂ©luia » J.K. Krishnamurti |â Pleine Conscience € MaĂźtrise de Soi € SpiritualitĂ© € ClartĂ© Mentale € Non-attachement â|
- Feb 15, 20261.6x their median
157- #JidduKrishnamurti #MĂ©ditation 4th #PublicTalk #Causerie â MEDITATION â #Krishnamurti - Le vol de lâaigle - ProblĂšmes soulevĂ©s par la contrainte et les mĂ©thodes â Flight of the Eagle -London 23rd March 1969 (Text - Image) #Question ! â âText below: The Book of Life / â Attention free of effort â Ref. #208 - Is there attention without anything absorbing the mind? Is there attention without concentrating upon an object? Is there attention without any form of motive, influence, compulsion? Can the mind give full attention without any sense of exclusion? Surely it can, and that is the only state of attention; the others are mere indulgence, or tricks of the mind. If you can give full attention without being absorbed in something, and without any sense of exclusion, then you will find out what it is to meditate; because in that attention there is no effort, no division, no struggle, no search for a result. So meditation is a process of freeing the mind from systems, and of giving attention without either being absorbed, or making an effort to concentrate. âââ TEXT - IMAGE OBSERVE⊠BE ATTENTIVE « THE THINKER' IS THE THOUGHT » Ref. #526 - Then there is the sudden realization that the `Thinker' is the Thought - a realization -, not a verbal statement, but an actuality. â Meditation đ The ability to observe without evaluating is the highest form of intelligence. đ Then what takes place? Is there such a thing as thought wandering? It is only when the `Observer' is different from Thought that he censors it; then he can say, `This is right or this is wrong thought,' or `Thought is wandering away I must control it.` But when the Thinker realizes that he is the Thought, is there a wandering at all? Go into it, sirs, don't accept it, you will see it for yourself. It is only when there is a resistance that there is conflict; the resistance is created by the thinker who thinks he is separate from the thought; but when the thinker realizes that he is the thought, there is no resistance - which does not mean that thought goes all over the place and does what it likes, on the contrary. The whole concept of control and concentration undergoes a tremendous change; it becomes Attention, something entirely different. If one understands the nature of Attention, that attention can be focused, one understands that it is quite different from concentration, which is exclusion. #JKrishnamurti #Mindfulness #Wisdom #Wise #Life /
- Aug 20, 2026
|âPROFOUND VISION: ENG € ESP € FR € ONE TRUTH € UNA VERDAD € UNE VĂRITĂ â| Buddhaâs Teachings Tipitaka Sutta Pitaka Ekadasaka Nipata AN 11. 15 Serenity (Samatha) Insight (Vipassana) Referenced within the Arahantâs Path đ Metta Sutta « Metta » đ /ENG « Metta » A Pali word meaning Loving-Kindness , Friendliness, Goodwill, Benevolence, Fellowship, Amity, Concord, Inoffensiveness & Non-Violence. ââ TEXT-IMAGE Good Will [metta] â Eleven good results that come out of the practice of metta. Monks, for one whose awareness-release through Good Will is cultivated, developed, pursued, handed the reins and taken as a basis, given a grounding, steadied, consolidated, and well-undertaken, eleven benefits can be expected. Which eleven? One sleeps easily, wakes easily, dreams no evil dreams. One is dear to human beings, dear to non-human beings. The devas protect one. Neither fire, poison, nor weapons can touch one. One's mind gains concentration quickly. One's complexion is bright. One dies unconfused and â if penetrating no higher â is headed for the Brahma worlds. ( These are the eleven benefits that can be expected for one whose awareness-release through Good Will ) /FR « Metta » Mot pĂąli qui veut dire BontĂ©, Gentillesse, Bonne VolontĂ©, Amour, AmitiĂ© ou Bienveillance, FraternitĂ©, Inoffensif et Non-Violence ââ TEXTE-IMAGE La bienveillance [ metta ] â Le Bouddha Ă©numĂšre onze bĂ©nĂ©fices qu'il y a Ă cultiver metta. Bhikkhus, celui qui cultive la dĂ©livrance de l'esprit par metta, qui la dĂ©veloppe, la poursuit, qui en fait son vĂ©hicule, qui la prend pour base, qui lui donne pied, qui l'affermit, la consolide et l'entreprend correctement, peut en attendre onze bienfaits. Quels sont ces onze? Il dort confortablement; il se rĂ©veille confortablement; il ne fait pas de mauvais rĂȘves; il est cher aux ĂȘtres humains; il est cher aux ĂȘtres non-humains; les devas le protĂšgent; le feu, le poison et les armes ne peuvent l'atteindre; son esprit peut se concentrer rapidement; son teint est clair; son esprit n'est pas confus au moment de sa mort; il renaĂźtra dans le monde de Brahma, dans le cas oĂč il n'a pas atteint un Ă©tat encore supĂ©rieur. ( Celui qui cultive la dĂ©livrance de l'esprit par metta peut en attendre ces onze bienfaits. ) ââ VERSION 2 - La bonne volontĂ© « Moines, pour qui cultive, dĂ©veloppe, poursuit, rend les rĂȘnes Ă , et prend pour base, donne une fondation Ă , stabilise, consolide et entreprend bien la libĂ©ration de la conscience au moyen de la bonne volontĂ©, on peut s'attendre Ă onze bĂ©nĂ©fices. Quels onze? 4 - «Il dort aisĂ©ment, s'Ă©veille aisĂ©ment, ne fait pas de mauvaise rĂȘves. Il est cher aux ĂȘtres humains, cher aux ĂȘtres non-humains. Les devas le protĂšgent. Ni feu ni poison ni armes ne peuvent le toucher. Son esprit gagne rapidement en concentration. Son teint est clair. Il meurt sans confusion etâs'il ne va pas plus hautâva tout droit dans les mondes de Brahma. «Ce sont lĂ les onze bĂ©nĂ©fices auxquels peut s'attendre celui qui cultive, dĂ©veloppe, poursuit, rend les rĂȘnes Ă , et prend pour base, donne une fondation Ă , stabilise, consolide et entreprend bien la libĂ©ration de la conscience au moyen de la bonne volontĂ©.» /ESP « #Metta » Amor universal benevolenteâ. significado por ejemplo: Calma, solidaridad, tolerancia, alegrĂa, afecto, reconocimiento, respeto, comprensiĂłn, compasiĂłn. / ââ TEXTO-IMAGEN Amor benevolente [metta] â El Buda enumera once beneficios de cultivar (metta) amor benevolente, âMonjes, cuando se procura, desarrolla y cultiva la liberaciĂłn de la mente a travĂ©s del amor benevolente, cuando se hace de Ă©l la base y el vehĂculo, cuando se lo cuida, consolida y se compromete adecuadamente con Ă©l, se pueden esperar once beneficios. Y, Âżcuales son esos once? âUno duerme bien, uno se despierta feliz, uno no tiene pesadillas, uno es agradable para los seres humanos, uno es agradable para los espĂritus, las deidades lo protegen, no lo lastiman el fuego, la pociĂłn ni las armas, su mente llega a concentrarse rapidamente, sus complexiones faciales son serenas, uno no muere confuso y, si no penetra mas alla, uno llega al mundo del Brahma. (Cuando se cultiva la liberaciĂłn de la mente a travĂ©s metta ⊠se pueden esperar estos once beneficios.) âïž âĄïžCont. Ekadasaka Nipata Metta Sutta â Amor benevolente Tomorrowâs Post đ„ #Bouddha |â Ăveil Spirituel âą Ăpanouissement de l'Ăme âą SpiritualitĂ© âą LibertĂ© IntĂ©rieure â| #Buddha |âMindfulness €Self Mastery €Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â|
- Aug 10, 2026
490 đ ENG | Jiddu Krishnamurtiđ„ PUBLICATION : New «FORMAT» Nouveau đ„ đ La Version Française du livre de Krishnamurti est publiĂ©e ci-dessous aprĂšs la Version Anglaise đ |â For OPTIMAL UNDERSTANDING Read the text with ATTENTION from the First word to the End â| Public Talk â This Matter of Culture-Think on These Things/Le sens du bonheur 1963 Dialogue â Question Answer â SAVOIR et TRADITION â ââ Q.: YOU TELL US THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO RESISTANCE IN PAYING ATTENTION. HOW CAN THIS BE? â K.: I HAVE SAID THAT ANY FORM OF RESISTANCE IS INATTENTION, DISTRACTION. Don't accept it, think it over. Don't accept anything, it does not matter who says it, but investigate the matter for yourself. If you merely accept, you become mechanical dull, you are already dead; but if you investigate, if you think things out for yourself, then you are alive, vital, a creative human being. Now, can you pay attention to what is being said and at the same time be aware that somebody is coming in, without turning your head to see who it is and without any resistance against turning your head? If you resist turning your head to look, your attention has already gone and you are wasting your mental energy in that resistance. So, CAN THERE BE A STATE OF TOTAL ATTENTION IN WHICH THERE IS NO DISTRACTION AND THEREFORE NO RESISTANCE? That is, can you pay attention to something WITH YOUR WHOLE BEING AND YET KEEP THE OUTSIDE OF YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS SENSITIVE TO ALL THAT IS HAPPENING ABOUT YOU AND WITHIN YOURSELF? âââ TEXT-IMAGE MEDITATION ATTENTION â INATTENTION PAY ATTENTION WITHOUT RESISTANCE UNDERSTANDING OF ONESELF IS THE WAY OF MEDITATION You see, the mind is an extraordinary instrument, it is constantly absorbing - seeing various forms and colours, receiving innumerable impressions, catching the meaning of words, the significance of a glance, and so on; and our problem is to pay attention to something while at the same time keeping the mind really sensitive to everything that is going on, including all the unconscious impressions and responses. What I am saying really involves the whole problem of meditation. We cannot enter into that now; but if one doesn't know how to meditate, one is not a mature human being. Meditation is one of the most important things in life - far more important than passing examinations to get a degree. To understand what is right meditation is not to practise meditation. The `practice' of anything in spiritual matters is deadly. To understand what is right meditation there must be an awareness of the operations of one's own consciousness, and then there is complete attention. But complete attention is not possible when there is any form of resistance. You see, most of us are educated to pay attention through resistance, and so our attention is always partial, never complete - and that is why learning becomes tedious, boring, a fearful thing. Therefore it is very important to pay attention in the deep sense of the word, which is to be aware of the workings of one's own mind. Without self-knowledge you cannot pay complete attention. đ„ That is why, in a real school, the student must not only be taught various subjects but also helped to be aware of the process of his own thinking. In understanding himself he will know what it is to pay attention without resistance, for the understanding of oneself is the way of meditation. â đïž đSadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïžAmong others it is used to express shared joy, moral approval, and spiritual agreement. Also means « excellent, well done, or it is good.» - «Amen or Hallelujah» #Krishnamurti |âMindfulness € Self Mastery € Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â| âđâ đ VERSION FRANĂAISE đ đïžOn LinkedIn « New Post » 490- đ FR | Jiddu Krishnamurti |â Pour une COMPRĂHENSION OPTIMALE, LIRE avec ATTENTION le texte au complet « du DĂ©but Ă la Fin » â| Causerie â Le sens du bonheur 1963 Dialogue â Question â Savoir et tradition â ââ Q.: VOUS NOUS DITES QUâIL NE DEVRAIT PAS Y AVOIR DE RĂSISTANCE LORSQU'ON EST ATTENTIF. COMMENT EST-CE POSSIBLE? â K.: J'AI DIT QUE TOUTE FORME DE RĂSISTANCE ĂTAIT DE L'INATTENTION, DE LA DISTRACTION. N'acquiescez pas Ă mes propos, rĂ©flĂ©chissez-y. Quel que soit celui qui parle, il ne faut rien accepter d'emblĂ©e, mais examiner la question par vous-mĂȘme. Si vous vous contentez d'accepter, vous devenez bĂȘte et semblable Ă une machine, vous ĂȘtes dĂ©jĂ mort; mais si vous menez votre propre enquĂȘte, si vous rĂ©flĂ©chissez par vous-mĂȘme, alors vous ĂȘtes vivant, plein d'Ă©nergie et de vitalitĂ©, vous ĂȘtes un ĂȘtre humain crĂ©atif. Pouvez-vous en mĂȘme temps ĂȘtre attentif Ă ce qui se dit Ă l'instant et Ă l'arrivĂ©e de quelqu'un dans la salle, sans tourner la tĂȘte pour voir qui entre, et sans rĂ©sister Ă l'envie de tourner la tĂȘte? Si vous rĂ©sistez Ă cette envie, votre attention a dĂ©jĂ disparu et vous gaspillez votre Ă©nergie mentale dans cette rĂ©sistance. PEUT-IL Y AVOIR UN ĂTAT D'ATTENTION TOTALE, DANS LEQUEL N'INTERVIENNE AUCUNE DISTRACTION, ET DONC AUCUNE RĂSISTANCE? En d'autres termes, pouvez-vous ĂȘtre attentif Ă une chose EN Y IMPLIQUANT TOUT VOTRE ĂTRE, TOUT EN PERMETTANT Ă VOTRE CONSCIENCE EXTĂRIEURE DE RESTER SENSIBLE Ă TOUT CE QUI SE PASSE AUTOUR DE VOUS ET EN VOUS-MĂME? âââ TEXTE-IMAGE LA MĂDITATION ATTENTION â INATTENTION ATTENTION TOTALE SANS RĂSISTANCE LA CONNAISSANCE DE SOI EST LA VOIE DE LA MĂDITATION L'esprit est un instrument extraordinaire, qui absorbe en permanence - qui voit diverses formes et couleurs, qui reçoit d'innombrables impressions, qui saisit la signification des mots, le sens d'un regard, etc. Et notre problĂšme est d'ĂȘtre attentif Ă une chose tout en conservant la sensibilitĂ© de l'esprit Ă tout ce qui se passe, y compris les impressions et les rĂ©actions inconscientes. Ce que je suis en train de dire implique toute la question de la mĂ©ditation. Nous ne pouvons pas l'aborder maintenant; mais pourtant, si l'on ne sait pas mĂ©diter, on n'a pas atteint sa maturitĂ© d'ĂȘtre humain. La mĂ©ditation est l'une des choses les plus importantes de la vie - beaucoup plus importante que le succĂšs aux examens et l'obtention d'un diplĂŽme universitaire. Comprendre ce qu'est LA VRAIE MĂDITATION, ce n'est pas pratiquer la mĂ©ditation. Toute « pratique » dans le domaine spirituel est mortifĂšre. Pour comprendre ce qu'est la vraie mĂ©ditation, il faut prendre acte des opĂ©rations qui se dĂ©roulent dans sa propre conscience, alors L'ATTENTION EST TOTALE. Mais cette attention totale n'est possible qu'en l'absence de toute forme de rĂ©sistance. On nous a gĂ©nĂ©ralement formĂ©s Ă ĂȘtre attentifs Ă force de rĂ©sistance, notre attention n'est donc toujours que partielle, jamais totale - voilĂ pourquoi apprendre devient une chose ennuyeuse,đ„assommante, Ă©pouvantable. Il est par consĂ©quent essentiel d'ĂȘtre attentif au sens profond du terme, c'est-Ă -dire conscient des agissements de son propre esprit. VoilĂ pourquoi, dans une vĂ©ritable Ă©cole, on doit non seulement enseigner diverses matiĂšres Ă l'Ă©lĂšve, mais aussi l'aider Ă prendre conscience de son propre processus de pensĂ©e. En se comprenant lui-mĂȘme, il saura ce qu'est l'attention sans rĂ©sistance, car la connaissance de soi est la voie de la mĂ©ditation. â đïž đ Sadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïž UtilisĂ© entre autres pour exprimer une joie partagĂ©e de dĂ©votion, une approbation des valeurs morales et spirituelles. Aussi une expression dâaccord et dâĂ©loge, signifiant « excellent, bien, bon » â « Amen » ou « AllĂ©luia » J.K. Krishnamurti |â Pleine Conscience € MaĂźtrise de Soi € SpiritualitĂ© € ClartĂ© Mentale € Non-attachement â|
- Aug 13, 2026
495 đ ENG | Jiddu Krishnamurtiđ„ PUBLICATION : New «FORMAT» Nouveau đ„ đ La Version Française du livre de Krishnamurti est publiĂ©e ci-dessous aprĂšs la Version Anglaise đ |â For OPTIMAL UNDERSTANDING Read the text with ATTENTION from the First word to the End â| đ„IMPORTANT â For Insight-understanding, read 10 times if necessary, or even 50 times, without embarrassment. This is very IMPORTANT! đ„ Meditation 5e Public Talk â MEDITATION â Question ! â Source: FREEDOM FROM THE KNOWN â The OBSERVER, saysâŠ: « I must get rid of this conflict" â OBSERVER « IS » OBSERVED â âââ TEXT-IMAGE-1 (Ref. 482 / bis ) OBSERVER is the OBSERVED « I observe and make my judgement, and thus the observer is separate from the thing he observes (bis)» â « So the observer is both the past and the present, and tomorrow is waiting and that is also a part of him. (bis)» â YOU ARE ALWAYS TRANSLATING THE NEW IN TERMS OF THE OLD AND THEREFORE YOU ARE EVERLASTINGLY IN CONFLICT. One image, as the observer, observes dozens of other images around himself and inside himself, and he says, `I like this image, I'm going to keep it' or `I don't like that image so I'll get rid of it', but the observer himself has been put together by the various images which have come into being through reaction to various other images. So we come to a point where we can say, `The observer is also the image, only he has separated himself and observes. This observer who has come into being through various other images thinks himself permanent and between himself and the images he has created there is a division, a time interval. This creates conflict between himself and the images he believes to be the cause of his troubles. So then he says, "I must get rid of this conflict", but the very desire to get rid of the conflict creates another image. Awareness of all this, which is real meditation, has revealed that there is a central image put together by all the other images, and the central image, the observer, is the censor, the experiencer, the evaluator, the judge who wants to conquer or subjugate the other images or destroy them altogether. The other images are the result of judgements, opinions and conclusions by the observer, and the observer is the result of all the other images - therefore the observer is the observed. So awareness has revealed the different states of one's mind, has revealed the various images and the contradiction between the images, has revealed the resulting conflict and the despair at not being able to do anything about it and the various attempts to escape from it. ALL THIS HAS BEEN REVEALED THROUGH CAUTIOUS HESITANT AWARENESS, AND THEN COMES THE AWARENESS THAT THE OBSERVER IS THE OBSERVED. â âââ Ref. 495- OBSERVER is the OBSERVED It is not a superior entity who becomes aware of this, it is not a higher self (but, are merely inventions, further images); it is the awareness itself which had revealed that the observer is the observed.đ„If you ask yourself a question, who is the entity who is going to receive the answer? And who is the entity who is going to enquire? If the entity is part of consciousness, part of thought, then it is incapable of finding out. What it can find out is only a state of awareness. But if in that state of awareness there is still an entity who says, `I must be aware, I must practise awareness', that again is another image. This awareness that the observer is the observed is not a process of identification with the observed. To identify ourselves with something is fairly easy. Most of us identify ourselves with something - with our family, our husband or wife, our nation - and that leads to great misery and great wars. We are considering something entirely different and we must understand it not verbally but in our core, right at the root of our being. In ancient China before an artist began to paint anything - a tree, for instance - he would sit down in front of it for days, months, years, it didn't matter how long, until he was the tree. He did not identify himself with the tree but he was the tree. This means that there was no space between him and the tree, no space between the observer and the observed,đ„no experiencer experiencing the beauty, the movement, the shadow, the depth of a leaf, the quality of colour. He was totally the tree, and in that state only could he paint. Any movement on the part of the observer, if he has not realized that the observer is the observed, creates only another series of images and again he is caught in them. âââ TEXT-IMAGE-2 OBSERVER is the OBSERVED â Source: Freedom From the Known â BUT WHAT TAKES PLACE WHEN THE OBSERVER IS AWARE THAT THE OBSERVER IS THE OBSERVED? Go slowly, go very slowly, because it is a very complex thing we are going into now. What takes place? The observer does not act at all. The observer has always said, `I must do something about these images, I must suppress them or give them a different shape; he is always active in regard to the observed, acting and reacting passionately or casually, and this action of like and dislike on the part of the observer is called positive action - `I like, therefore I must hold. I dislike therefore I must get rid of.' But when the observer realizes that the thing about which he is acting is himself, then there is no conflict between himself and the image. He is that. He is not separate from that.đ„When he was separate, he did, or tried to do, something about it, but when the observer realizes that he is that, then there is no like or dislike and conflict ceases. For what is he to do? If something is you, what can you do? You cannot rebel against it or run away from it or even accept it. It is there. So all action that is the outcome of reaction to like-and dislike has come to an end. Then you will find that there is an awareness that has become tremendously alive. It is not bound to any central issue or to any image - and from that intensity of awareness there is a different quality of attention and therefore the mind - because the mind is this awareness - has become extraordinarily sensitive and highly intelligent. đïž đSadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïžAmong others it is used to express shared joy, moral approval, and spiritual agreement. Also means « excellent, well done, or it is good.» - «Amen or Hallelujah» J.K. Krishnamurti |âMindfulness € Self Mastery € Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â| âđâ đ VERSION FRANĂAISE đ đïžOn LinkedIn « New Post » 495 đ FR | Jiddu Krishnamurti |â Pour une COMPRĂHENSION OPTIMALE, LIRE avec ATTENTION le texte au complet « du DĂ©but Ă la Fin » â| đ„IMPORTANT: Pour Insight-comprĂ©hension lire 10 fois sâil le faut, voire mĂȘme 50 fois, sans-gĂȘne. Ce contenu est trĂšs IMPORTANT ! đ„ 5e Causerie âSE LIBĂRER DU CONNU â OBSERVATEUR & OBSERVĂ âââ TEXTE â IMAGE-1 (Ref. 482 bis) LâOBSERVATEUR est LâOBSERVà « j'observe et que j'Ă©mets mes jugements, et c'est Ainsi que l'observateur se sĂ©pare de ce qu'il observe (bis)» â « Ainsi l'observateur est Ă la fois le passĂ© et le prĂ©sent ; Et le lendemain qui est en attente est aussi une partie de lui. (bis)» âVOUS NE FAITES JAMAIS QUE TRADUIRE LE NEUF EN TERMES DU VIEUX ET, PAR CONSĂQUENT, VOUS VOUS TROUVEZ DANS DE SEMPITERNELS CONFLITS. Une image, en tant qu'observateur, observe des douzaines d'autres images autour d'elle et en elle, et dit: « Celle-ci me plaĂźt, je la garde », ou « celle-lĂ me dĂ©plaĂźt, je vais m'en dĂ©barrasser ». Mais cet observateur lui-mĂȘme a Ă©tĂ© fabriquĂ© par les diffĂ©rentes images qui ont Ă©tĂ© créées par des rĂ©actions Ă diverses autres images. Nous arrivons alors au point oĂč nous pouvons dire que l'observateur est aussi une image, mais qui s'est sĂ©parĂ©e des autres, et qui observe. Ayant Ă©tĂ© engendrĂ© par des images variĂ©es, cet observateur se croit pourtant permanent et il se produit entre lui et ce qu'il crĂ©e une division, un intervalle de temps, cela provoque un conflit entre lui et les images qu'il accuse d'ĂȘtre la cause de ses tracas. Il dit alors: « Je dois me dĂ©livrer de ce conflit », et ce dĂ©sir mĂȘme qu'il a de s'en dĂ©gager crĂ©e, encore, une nouvelle image. S'ĂȘtre rendu compte de tout cela â et c'est la vraie mĂ©ditation â a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© qu'il y a une image centrale assemblĂ©e par toutes les autres, qui est l'observateur, le censeur, celui qui perçoit l'expĂ©rience, celui qui Ă©value.C'est le juge qui veut conquĂ©rir ou subjuguer les images qui l'ont créé, ou mĂȘme les dĂ©truire, incitĂ© par celles qui rĂ©sultent de ses jugements, de ses opinions, de ses conclusions. Mais ces images qui l'ont créé le voient, Ă leur tour, et c'est alors que l'observateur, « est » l'observĂ©. Ainsi la luciditĂ© a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© les diffĂ©rents Ă©tats qui composent notre Ă©tat de conscience ; elle a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© les images contrastantes qui s'y trouvent et la nature de leurs contradictions ; elle a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© les conflits qui engendrent ces contradictions, le dĂ©sespoir de n'y rien pouvoir faire, et les divers moyens que l'on met en pratique pour s'en Ă©vader ; TOUT CELA PAR UNE QUĂTE PRUDENTE ET HĂSITANTE Ă LA SUITE DE QUOI IL EST APPARU QUE L'OBSERVATEUR « EST » L'OBSERVĂ. â âââ RĂ©f. 495 â L'OBSERVATEUR « EST » L'OBSERVĂ â Il n'est pas une entitĂ© supĂ©rieure, devenue consciente. Il n'est pas un surmoi. Ces « Soi » exaltĂ©s ne sont que des inventions, des images qui s'ajoutent Ă toutes les autres: c'est la luciditĂ© elle-mĂȘme qui a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© que l'observateur est l'observĂ©. Lorsque vous vous posez une question, quelle est l'entitĂ© qui recevra la rĂ©ponse? đ„ Et quelle est l'entitĂ© ? qui cherche Ă s'informer? Si elle est une partie de votre conscience, une partie de votre pensĂ©e, elle sera incapable de trouver ce qu'elle cherche. Tout ce qu'elle peut trouver, c'est un Ă©tat lucide. Mais si dans cet Ă©tat il y a encore une entitĂ© qui dit: « Je dois ĂȘtre lucide, je dois m'exercer Ă l'ĂȘtre », ce n'est encore qu'une nouvelle image. La perception du fait que l'observateur est l'observĂ© n'est pas un processus d'identification avec l'observĂ©. S'identifier Ă quelque chose est assez facile. C'est ce que font la plupart d'entre nous: ils s'identifient Ă leur famille, Ă leur mari ou Ă leur femme, Ă leur nation, ce qui conduit Ă de grandes souffrances et Ă des guerres. Ce dont nous parlons est totalement diffĂ©rent, et nous devons le comprendre non pas verbalement, mais avec notre ĂȘtre le plus profond, alertĂ© jusqu'Ă ses racines. Dans la Chine ancienne, un peintre, avant de commencer Ă peindre quoi que ce soit â un arbre, par exemple â s'asseyait devant son sujet pendant des jours, des mois, des annĂ©es â peu importait le temps â jusqu'à « devenir » l'arbre. Il ne s'identifiait pas Ă lui, il Ă©tait cet arbre. Cela veut dire qu'il n'y avait pas d'espace entre l'arbre et lui,đ„pas d'espace entre l'observateur et l'observĂ©, pas d'entitĂ© vivant sa perception de la beautĂ©, du mouvement, de l'ombre, de la profondeur d'une feuille, de la qualitĂ© de sa couleur. Il Ă©tait l'arbre totalement et en cet Ă©tat seulement pouvait-il peindre. Tout mouvement de l'observateur, s'il ne s'est pas rendu compte qu'il est l'observĂ©, ne peut crĂ©er que de nouvelles sĂ©ries d'images, oĂč il se retrouve captif. âââ TEXTE â IMAGE L'OBSERVATEUR « EST » L'OBSERVĂ â Se libĂ©rer du connu â MAIS QUE SE PASSE-T-IL LORSQUE L'OBSERVATEUR EST CONSCIENT D'ĂTRE L'OBSERVĂ? Examinez cette question lentement, trĂšs lentement, car nous entrons maintenant dans quelque chose de trĂšs complexe. Que se passe-t-il? L'observateur, ainsi conscient n'agit plus du tout. Il s'Ă©tait toujours dit: « Je dois faire quelque chose en ce qui concerne ces images, les abolir ou leur donner de nouvelles formes » ; il avait toujours Ă©tĂ© actif au sujet de ce qu'il observait, agissant et rĂ©agissant, soit avec passion, soit avec indolence. Ce mode d'agir, basĂ© sur le plaire et le dĂ©plaire, a toujours Ă©tĂ© qualifiĂ© de positif: « Ceci me plaĂźt, je le retiens, cela me dĂ©plaĂźt, je m'en dĂ©barrasse. » Lorsque l'observateur se rend compte queđ„ce sur quoi il agissait n'Ă©tait autre que « lui-mĂȘme » en sa qualitĂ© d'observateur, tout conflit cesse entre lui et ses images. Il est « cela », il n'en est pas sĂ©parĂ©. Lorsqu'il s'en sĂ©parait, il agissait, ou essayait d'agir sur ce qu'il voyait, mais maintenant, sachant que ces tentatives s'exerçaient sur lui-mĂȘme, le plaire et le dĂ©plaire ne sont plus en jeu, et le conflit cesse. Que peut-il faire? Que peut-on faire au sujet d'une chose qui est soi-mĂȘme? On ne peut ni se rĂ©volter contre elle, ni la fuir, ni mĂȘme l'accepter. Elle est « là »! Alors toute action qui provient des rĂ©actions du plaire et du dĂ©plaire parvient Ă sa fin, et on dĂ©couvre une luciditĂ© qui est devenue extrĂȘmement vivante. Elle n'est tributaire ni de l'activitĂ© d'un centre, ni d'images. De son intensitĂ© se dĂ©gage une attention d'une qualitĂ© telle, que l'esprit â qui est cette luciditĂ© â devient extraordinairement sensitif et hautement intelligent. â đïž đ Sadhu ! Sadhu ! Sadhu ! đ đïž UtilisĂ© entre autres pour exprimer une joie partagĂ©e de dĂ©votion, une approbation des valeurs morales et spirituelles. Aussi une expression dâaccord et dâĂ©loge, signifiant « excellent, bien, bon » â « Amen » ou « AllĂ©luia » J.K. Krishnamurti |âPleine Conscience âą MaĂźtrise de Soi âą SpiritualitĂ© âą ClartĂ© Mentale âą Non-attachement â|
- Aug 10, 2026
|â EN € ESP € FR â| â INSIGHT € PROFOUND VISION ONE TRUTH € UNA VERDAD €UNE VĂRITĂ â| #Buddhaâs Teachings Elements to Reach New Heights /ENG Majjhima Nikaya MN19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta Two Sorts of Thinking Buddha said⊠before my self-awakening, the thought occurred to me: Why don't I keep dividing my thinking into two sorts? 1. does not lead to Unbinding 2. leads to Unbinding. So I made thinking imbued with sensuality, thinking imbued with ill will, & thinking imbued with harmfulness one sort, and thinking imbued with renunciation, thinking imbued with non-ill will, & thinking imbued with harmlessness another sort. âïž So I made thinking imbued with sensuality, thinking imbued with ill will, & thinking imbued with harmfulness one sort (does not lead to Unbinding), The thought that leads to my own affliction or to the affliction of others or to the affliction of both; I simply abandoned it, dispelled it, wiped it out of existence. âïž I made thinking imbued with renunciation, thinking imbued with non-ill will, and thinking imbued with harmlessness another sort (lead to Unbinding). Thinking that leads neither to my own affliction, nor to the affliction of others, nor to the affliction of both. ⊠So I steadied my mind right within, settled, unified, & concentrated it. Why is that? So that my mind would not be disturbed. Buddha |âMindfulness €Self Mastery €Spirituality € Mental Clarity € Attachment Free â| đ„/ESP Majjhima Nikaya NM 19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta Dos clases de pensamiento Antes de mi auto-despertar, ⊠se me ocurriĂł el pensamiento: â ÂżPor quĂ© no sigo dividiendo mi pensamiento en dos tipos?â 1. no lleva a la LiberaciĂłn 2. lleva a la LiberaciĂłn AsĂ hice del pensamiento impregnado de sensualidad, del pensamiento impregnado de mala voluntad y del pensamiento impregnado de lo pernicioso un tipo, y del pensamiento impregnado de renunciaciĂłn, del pensamiento impregnado de buena voluntad y del pensamiento impregnado de lo beneficioso otro tipo. âïžAsĂ hice del pensamiento impregnado de sensualidad, del pensamiento impregnado de mala voluntad y del pensamiento impregnado de lo pernicioso un tipo (no lleva a la LiberaciĂłn). El pensamiento⊠que lleva a mi propia aflicciĂłn o a la aflicciĂłn de otros o a la aflicciĂłn de ambos; simplemente lo abandonaba, lo destruĂa, lo disipaba, lo eliminaba de la existencia. âïž Asi hice del pensamiento impregnado de renunciaciĂłn, del pensamiento impregnado de buena voluntad y del pensamiento impregnado de lo beneficioso otro tipo (lleva a la LiberaciĂłn). El pensamiento impregnado de lo beneficioso y que eso no me lleva ni a mi aflicciĂłn ni a la aflicciĂłn de otros ni a la aflicciĂłn de ambos. AsĂ pues calmĂ© mi mente internamente, la tranquilicĂ©, la unifiquĂ© y la concentrĂ©. ÂżPara quĂ©? Para que mi mente no estuviera inquieta. âïž đ„/FR Majjhima Nikaya MN19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta Deux types de pensĂ©es Bouddha dit⊠avant mon auto-Ă©veil, de la pensĂ©e me vint:đ„ Pourquoi est-ce que je ne continue pas Ă diviser ma pensĂ©e en deux sortes? 1. qui ne conduit pas Ă la LibĂ©ration 2. qui conduit Ă la LibĂ©ration Je fis donc de la pensĂ©e empreinte de sensualitĂ©, de la pensĂ©e empreinte de mauvaise volontĂ©, et de la pensĂ©e empreinte de nocivitĂ© une sorte, et de la pensĂ©e empreinte de renoncement, de la pensĂ©e empreinte de non-mauvaise volontĂ©, et de la pensĂ©e empreinte d'innocuitĂ© une autre sorte. âïžJe fis donc de la pensĂ©e empreinte de sensualitĂ©, de la pensĂ©e empreinte de mauvaise volontĂ©, et de la pensĂ©e empreinte de nocivitĂ© une sorte (qui ne conduit pas Ă la LibĂ©ration), La pensĂ©e qui conduit Ă ma propre affliction ou Ă l'affliction d'autres que moi ou Ă l'affliction de tous deux; je l'abandonnais tout simplement, la dĂ©truisais, la dissipais, l'effaçais de l'existence. âïžJe fis donc de la pensĂ©e empreinte de renoncement, de la pensĂ©e empreinte de non-mauvaise volontĂ©, et de la pensĂ©e empreinte d'innocuitĂ© une autre sorte (qui conduit Ă la LibĂ©ration). La pensĂ©e empreinte d'innocuité⊠conduit ni Ă ma propre affliction, ni Ă l'affliction d'autres que moi, ni Ă l'affliction de tous deux. ⊠J'ai donc affermi mon esprit tout au dedans, đ„je l'ai posĂ©, unifiĂ©, et concentrĂ©. Pourquoi donc? De façon Ă ce que mon esprit ne soit pas gĂȘnĂ©. âïž Bouddha |â Ăveil Spirituel âą Ăpanouissement de l'Ăme âą SpiritualitĂ© âą LibertĂ© IntĂ©rieure â| âââ TEXT-IMAGE MajjhimaNikaya 19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta Two Sorts of Thinking When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of the ending of the mental fermentations. I discerned, as it had come to be, that 'This is stress⊠This is the origination of stress⊠This is the cessation of stress⊠This is the way leading to the cessation of stress⊠These are fermentations⊠This is the origination of fermentations⊠This is the cessation of fermentations⊠This is the way leading to the cessation of fermentations. My heart, thus knowing, thus seeing, was released from the fermentation of sensuality, released from the fermentation of becoming, released from the fermentation of ignorance. With release, there was the knowledge, 'Released.' I discerned that «Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done.» There is nothing further for this world. đ„ MajjhimaNikaya 19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta Dos clases de pensamiento Cuando la mente estaba asĂ concentrada, purificada, radiante, sin macula, libre de corrupciĂłn, flexible, maleable, firme y hubo alcanzado la imperturbabilidad, la dirigĂ al conocimiento de la finalizaciĂłn de las corrupciones mentales . ObservĂ©, como habĂa llegado a ser, que 'Esto es estrĂ©s⊠Esto es el origen del estrĂ©s⊠Esta es la cesaciĂłn del estrĂ©s⊠Este es el camino que lleva a la cesaciĂłn del estrĂ©s⊠Estas son las corrupciones⊠Este es el origen de las corrupciones⊠Esta es la cesaciĂłn de las corrupciones⊠Este es el camino que lleva a la cesaciĂłn de las corrupciones'. Mi corazĂłn, sabiendo asĂ, viendo asĂ, fue liberado de la corrupciĂłn de la sensualidad, liberado de la corrupciĂłn del devenir, liberado de la corrupciĂłn de la ignorancia. Con la liberaciĂłn, hubo el conocimiento 'Liberado'. ObservĂ© que «El nacimiento ha terminado, la vida santa se ha cumplido, la tarea realizada.» No hay nada mas para este mundo. MajjhimaNikaya 19 Dvedhavitakka Sutta Deux maniĂšres de penser Lorsque l'esprit fut ainsi concentrĂ©, purifiĂ©, clair, sans tache, dĂ©barrassĂ© des souillures, flexible, mallĂ©able, ferme, et arrivĂ© Ă l'imperturbabilitĂ©,đ„je le dirigeai vers la connaissance de la fin des fermentations mentales. Je discernai, comme cela Ă©tait rĂ©ellement prĂ©sent, que 'Ceci est le stress⊠Ceci est l'origine du stress⊠Ceci est la cessation du stress⊠Ceci est la voie qui mĂšne Ă la cessation du stress.. Ceci sont les fermentations⊠Ceci est l'origine des fermentationsâŠCeci est la cessation des fermentations⊠Ceci est la voie qui mĂšne Ă la cessation des fermentations.' Mon coeur, sachant cela, en voyant ainsi, fut libĂ©rĂ© de la fermentation de la sensualitĂ©, libĂ©rĂ© de la fermentation du devenir, libĂ©rĂ© de la fermentation de l'ignorance. Avec la libĂ©ration, il y eut la connaissance, 'LibĂ©rĂ©.' Je discernai que «La naissance est terminĂ©e, la vie s inte remplie, la tĂąche accomplie.» Il n'y a plus rien pour ce monde. âââ Buddha explains⊠Bouddha explique⊠Buda explica⊠âĄïžCont. Action Dvedhavitakka Sutta Two Sorts of Thinking Tomorrowâs Post đ„
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.309% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.168% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 69% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 2199x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #buddha, #blessings, #lovelife.
- What is Etienne Arsenault's engagement rate on X?
- Etienne Arsenault (@JETAR9) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,732,639 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Etienne Arsenault sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JETAR9 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JETAR9 post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.73 posts per day across the measured window.