Back to @JZarif's profile

Javad Zarif engagement report

@JZarif - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.067%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
2.64%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
2.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 173K interactions, about 157x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, Javad Zarif sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 7, 2026157x their median

    With the greatest humility, I am pleased to announce that the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, along with their allies, have agreed to an immediate ceasefire everywhere including Lebanon and elsewhere, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY. I warmly welcome the sagacious gesture and extend deepest gratitude to the leadership of both the countries and invite their delegations to Islamabad on Friday, 10th April 2026, to further negotiate for a conclusive agreement to settle all disputes. Both parties have displayed remarkable wisdom and understanding and have remained constructively engaged in furthering the cause of peace and stability. We earnestly hope, that the ‘Islamabad Talks’ succeed in achieving sustainable peace and wish to share more good news in coming days! @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @SecRubio @SteveWitkoff @SEPeaceMissions @drpezeshkian @mb_ghalibaf @araghchi

    126K30K12K5.7K13M viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 202613x their median

    Want to know why negotiations did not succeed? JD Vance: "they have chosen not to accept our terms." Bingo. No negotiations – at least with Iran – will succeed based on "our/your terms." The US must learn: you can't dictate terms to Iran. It's not too late to learn. Yet.

    9.3K1.9K2.6K294880K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 20268.0x their median

    Iran stood at the heart of the cradle of civilization while your ancestors in Europe (as the U.S. wasn’t even on the map) were still in the Stone Age—painting faces & swinging clubs. We taught order, law and statecraft. Pity none of it reached some arrogant, ignorant descendants. https://t.co/zsldaU71zQ

    5.6K1.5K1.5K210573K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20267.2x their median

    هوشمندی رهبری و ایثار رییس جمهور، رییس و اعضای هیأت مذاکره‌کننده برای تثبیت پیروزی تاریخی مردم و سربازان وطن در برابر دو متجاوز اتمی، شایسته پشتیبانی ملی است. امیدوارم با تقویت رضایت مردم و ستون‌های مادی و معنایی قدرت میهنی، این راه پرگردنه به سلامت طی شود. جای شهدا خالی https://t.co/onceg9oVkC

    5.4K4761.9K143192K viewsView on X
  • Mar 21, 20266.6x their median

    Iran has outlived empires & aggressors mightier than the US. Ferdowsi wrote a millennium ago, before America was even on the map: اگر سر به سر تن به کشتن دهیم از آن به که کشور به دشمن دهیم If head to head we yield ourselves to death, ’Tis better far than yield our land to foes. https://t.co/czLLcOjGny

    3.7K7952.7K190366K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 20266.0x their median

    US & Israel started this war of choice, proving once again that for them PEACE is "existential threat". It's the 3rd time negotiated solutions are torpedoed to serve Netanyahu. Mark my word: Iran has outlived each & every aggressor over millennia. It won't be different this time

    3.4K6742.4K125521K viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 20265.6x their median

    As an Iranian, outraged by Donald Trump’s reckless aggression & crude insults, yet proud of our armed forces & resilient people, I am torn about publishing this peace-plan in Foreign Affairs. Yet I'm convinced that war must end on terms consistent with Iran’s national interests.

    3.4K4292.1K212849K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 20265.5x their median

    . . به ایران سربلند و ایرانیان سرافراز ما را سری‌ست با تو که گر خلق روزگار دشمن شوند و سر برود هم بر آن سریم https://t.co/FCk2j1uoLx

    3.2K2952.4K138276K viewsView on X
  • Apr 5, 20265.2x their median

    Nothing screams "winning" quite like vulgarity. Campaign on America First, then, blackmailed by a wanted criminal, pivot to Israel First. Targeting civilian infrastructure isn’t strength. It’s a desperate WAR CRIME, plunging the world into the Stone Age. Oh, and Happy Easter. https://t.co/maH1n3aDVD

    3.8K7541.0K76198K viewsView on X
  • Nov 28, 20255.0x their median

    بی‌گمان گلایه‌های بسیار از یکدیگر داریم امروز گزینه هوشمندانه برای زمامداران باور به مردم برای پرواز از پیله ناکامی‌های گذشته است که همه ما را از دیدن فرصت‌های فراوان آینده بازداشته‌اند بیاییم برای شناسایی و استفاده از فرصت‌های گذرای داخلی و خارجی به سوی آینده‌ای بهتر #باهم‌باشیم https://t.co/frb6JSGXFl

    2.3K2182.7K196300K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 173K interactions, about 157x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Javad Zarif's engagement rate on X?
Javad Zarif (@JZarif) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,642,416 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, Javad Zarif sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JZarif have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @JZarif post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going