Back to @J_D_Landis's profile

J. D. Landis engagement report

@J_D_Landis - 528K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 528K followers
Per impression
0.289%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
33
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 528K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.289% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 187 interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

J. D. Landis's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, J. D. Landis sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20265.7x their median

    The tributes to Dolly Parton provide such relief, to learn so much about such a good person, when the news has, for years, been dominated by the inescapable presence of a truly despicable person. Both bring tears to one's eyes, for totally opposite reasons.

    15918739.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.0x their median

    What happened to the word "me"? "Between you and I"--you should be shot (with a diction drug). "There's a lot of gossip about myself"--ugh! The word "myself" can be used only when the word "I" is in the sentence. "I praise myself."--okay "He praised himself and myself."--never Let's hear it for good, old ME!

    941322211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20263.0x their median

    What (not who) do you think you'll miss the most when you've left this life?

    21370620K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20263.0x their median

    The less free the press, the more enslaved the people.

    75176215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.7x their median

    Good people suffer more than do bad people.

    69115313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.5x their median

    War is murder, as soon as a single non-combatant is killed, and those responsible should be prosecuted. There is no better way to try to end what seems to be the unending killing of innocents. "Collateral damage" is an excuse, not a reason, and must be one of the most cynical phrases ever conceived by human beings.

    57206014K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.2x their median

    The less free the press, the more manipulated the public.

    54153016K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.0x their median

    The less free the press, the more duped the people.

    5294113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.8x their median

    "Donald Trump-picked Kennedy Center board votes to reinstall his name on building, testing judge’s order"--Next naming ceremony on the Gates of Hell

    4694013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.7x their median

    Would you find it contradictory for someone to take his vitamins before committing suicide?

    31223117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 528K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.289% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 187 interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

What is J. D. Landis's engagement rate on X?
J. D. Landis (@J_D_Landis) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 527,634 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, J. D. Landis sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @J_D_Landis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @J_D_Landis post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going