Jeremy Boreing engagement report
@JeremyDBoreing - 479K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 479K followers, an engagement rate of 0.22%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 4,085 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #composer, #filmmaking, #filmscore.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #composer, #filmmaking, #filmscore.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jeremy Boreing's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,085 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.22%, Jeremy Boreing sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,683 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.082% to 0.442%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.013% |
| 50th percentile | 0.082% |
| 75th percentile | 0.442% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 149.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 55K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 56K |
| 02:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 58K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 47K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 46K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 57K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 66K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 76K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 79K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 85K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 103K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 106K |
| 15:00 UTC | -1% | 109K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 106K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 99K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 92K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 81K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 72K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 62K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 56K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 246K |
| Monday | +1% | 315K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 330K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 278K |
| Thursday | -2% | 256K |
| Friday | -3% | 267K |
| Saturday | +3% | 240K |
Best tweets
- Aug 20, 2026127x their median
the hate the “she’s got help” scene gets genuinely irritates me because it meant the absolute world to 14 y/o me. when thor, tony and steve team up, it’s “peak,” but when the strongest women in the mcu finally get their moment, suddenly it’s “cringe.” https://t.co/PSiIgR71uL
- Aug 20, 202629x their median
NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE JUST STOP PAYING STUDENT LOANS… Logged in this morning to check my balance. Borrowed $32k back in 2013. Been paying $420 a month, every month, eleven years now. Do the math on that and it's over $55,000 that's left my account. Balance today: $28,900. Eleven years. Fifty five grand. And I've knocked about three thousand off what I actually borrowed. I have now paid them more than I ever took out and I still owe basically the whole thing. WHERE DID THAT $55,000 GO? Genuinely asking. I'll shut up and listen.
- Aug 19, 202613x their median
Lindsay Clancy is just OJ Simpson for white chicks.
- Aug 26, 20261.8x their median
Tucker's claw marks. Candace's "We are legion." Shawn Ryan's terrifying experience with psychedelics. Something spiritual is breaking open in America — and nobody's guarding the door. Tonight I'm talking with one of the world's leading experts on demonic possession, an ex-psychic, and an investigative journalist on spiritual warfare in the digital age. @BillyHallowell, Jenn Nizza, and Dr. Richard Gallagher join me tonight at 5 PM ET https://t.co/GoDDmfFMF7
- Aug 22, 2026
🚨🚨Andrew Tate’s lawyers just told a US federal court that the OfWudan account “does not belong to Andrew Tate” and that he “did not generate these posts.” However, Andrew Tate is ON VIDEO saying the account is his and literally spelling out “OfWudan.” https://t.co/MIBzTN1QTQ
- Aug 26, 2026
I am a conservative. And I have now watched five episodes of The West Wing. Each one made me smile. The show is unapologetically liberal. Yet it feels less foreign to me than much of modern politics. I think I know why. The West Wing presents a country that still believed its institutions were worth fighting over. Its characters disagree intensely, but they share a few assumptions: America is fundamentally good. Public service can be honorable. Competence matters. Patriotism belongs to everyone. The opposing party can be wrong without being evil and the presidency is larger than the person occupying it. That world now feels almost innocent. The show premiered when I was two years out of school, in 1999, before 9/11, the Iraq War, the financial crisis, social media, and the industrialization of political outrage. Politics was bitter then. Clinton had just been impeached and yet the entire culture had not yet been reorganized around making every American angry every waking hour. Bartlet’s Democrats are liberal, but they speak a moral and cultural language many conservatives now miss. They openly love America. They respect religion. They take duty and personal responsibility seriously and expect government to be competent and never apologize for wanting America to be strong. Bartlet is a Catholic New Deal liberal with an economist’s brain and an old-fashioned understanding of duty. Sorkin’s Washington is obviously romanticized. It is filled with brilliant, earnest people walking quickly through beautiful buildings because they believe tomorrow’s policy meeting might improve the country. And that is precisely what feels so moving. There was innocence in it. In these five episodes I have watched a fictional America in which grown-ups still run the government, political opponents remain fellow citizens, and everyone believes the country can become better. We may never have fully lived in that America, but in 1999, we could still imagine it without feeling naïve.
- Aug 19, 2026
Candace Owens: “We are Legion.”
- Aug 26, 2026
We all know the aphorism about the dynastic cycle. Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create hard times. Hard times are upon us again—and America’s pastors are among the weak mean who created them. My message to the shepherds: https://t.co/tPXjd4LcE5
- Aug 28, 2026
https://t.co/LWqoORUQ30
- Aug 26, 2026
NEW EPISODE: “You can either let something destroy you, or you can use it to make yourself better and move forward.” -Roger Avary, Screenwriter @AVARY 0:00:00 Roger Avary 0:00:25 Beowulf, Excalibur & Neil Gaiman 0:08:07 Selling the Script to Zemeckis 0:14:20 The Accident 0:18:03 Incarceration & Who He Became 0:26:01 The Writing Tunnel 0:37:56 Prison Life & Spiritual Awakening 0:55:10 The Chosen, Forgiveness & Punk Rock Jesus 1:04:26 Media, Violence & the State of the World 1:19:48 Formative Films & What Makes a Movie Great 1:54:03 Dialogue, Truth & Visualizing Reality
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 479K followers, an engagement rate of 0.22%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 4,085 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 82K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #composer, #filmmaking, #filmscore.
- What is Jeremy Boreing's engagement rate on X?
- Jeremy Boreing (@JeremyDBoreing) has an engagement rate of 0.22%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 478,766 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.22%, Jeremy Boreing sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,683 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JeremyDBoreing have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,085 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JeremyDBoreing post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.