Jillian Michaels engagement report
@JillianMichaels - 1.7M followers on X
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 583 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video, 60% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 78x its own typical post.
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jillian Michaels's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.035%, Jillian Michaels sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.431% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 51K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 71K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 93K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 96K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 229K |
| Monday | 0% | 284K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 273K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 250K |
| Thursday | -2% | 243K |
| Friday | -3% | 251K |
| Saturday | +3% | 226K |
Best tweets
- Aug 2, 202678x their median
Scott Galloway is a perfect example of perhaps the most pernicious people in society: the stupid-smart person. Educated beyond his intelligence. Smart enough vocabulary to justify his ego and smugness, but too stupid to understand basic realities of communists. Smart people internalize history and make good decisions. They also know the dangers of hubris. Stupid people don't know enough to even opine on the issues in the first place, so their stupidity isn't a threat. But the stupid-smart person can teach at NYU, he can build a big successful business, he can even give a good TED Talk, but he's not smart enough to see the limits of his own capacities...so he asserts himself in society with an outsized level of confidence. Sadly, he's articulate enough to fool lots of people into elevating his stupid ideas...and that's the problem. People listen to the stupid-smart guys, like him. Then they're genuinely baffled when there's a Kalashnikov pointed at their head as they're staring at a cinder block wall behind the politburo headquarters. In a functional society, this clown would be a pariah. I have precisely zero empathy for his plight in NYC. He endorsed it. Now he can eat it, good and hard.
- Aug 9, 202636x their median
This is unbelievable. I thought it was AI. Abdul El-Sayed advocates for sharia law in the U.S. He argues that the U.S. banned sharia because of hate and discrimination, and the forces that banned it are the same forces that committed [insert every historic evil]. This is obscene political propaganda, putting sharia law in the same category of victimhood as historic American tragedies. It’s a perfect example of how illiberal movements use liberal politics as a Trojan horse to smuggle in authoritarianism. But you are right about one thing, Abdul. You don’t know what it means. Iranians do, and their message is clear: Fuck you, and fuck your sharia law.
- Aug 5, 202634x their median
Hollywood just got exposed in a way no one saw coming. When Anne Hathaway took the stage to preach about systemic privilege, she probably didn't expect a viral breakdown to instantly dismantle her entire speech line by line. Watching elite celebrities virtue signal from luxury podiums has officially reached its boiling point, but what happens when someone finally holds up a mirror to the hypocrisy will leave you completely speechless.
- Aug 16, 202629x their median
Are these people Really this insane? https://t.co/qECOCWGB3d
- Aug 21, 202626x their median
TERRIFYING: Abdul El-Sayed told his camera crew during his 2018 gubernatorial campaign to HIDE his shelf full of Qurans and other Islamic books because he wanted to pretend to be secular. “You’re gonna wanna not get these things (Qurans) in the shot. Try to keep the shot secular.” This is a prime example of TAQIYYA, the Islamic practice of lying to advance Islam. Abdul El-Sayed is NOT a ‘progressive’, ‘far-left’, or ‘socialist.’ He’s only using those groups as useful idiots to get into power. He’s first and foremost a Muslim, and as such, the only thing he cares about is advancing Islam. https://t.co/YkLfzIyhny
- Aug 9, 202625x their median
Why Is Everyone Scared of Hasan Piker? @hasanthehun's incendiary clips about Israel have brought flak from both sides of the aisle. But what he wants, he says, is to make people listen. Read: https://t.co/z0NREKp0mG https://t.co/zLZUVEk0jx
- Aug 16, 202616x their median
💥NEW: Jillian Michaels shares her "PERSONAL AWAKENING" story on abortion🤯 "As a former liberal, I just supported abortion ... Not abortion — but pro-choice. A woman's right to choose ... I never really gave it much thought as a young kid." "Now I'm 38 and my ex is pregnant and we go into the doctor's office. She's eight weeks pregnant and they do an ultrasound and my son is in there obviously — but he was moving and I called him the dancing peanut." *rolls clip of her reaction to son's ultrasound* "He was dancing around in there and I remember being absolutely gobsmacked thinking, 'There's a little soul in there. We're eight weeks into this. This is not just a clump of cells. There is a human alive in there!'" "I know I sound so stupid — but it was a game changer for me. And I just had to rethink everything that I had ever believed prior to that moment." "To abort a healthy child, to be dead honest with you, anything after — to me even 15 weeks is insane!" Ultrasounds are massive wake-up calls on abortion. You realize how early an unborn child takes form and that just because a child is unborn does not mean it lacks a soul. Powerful testimony from Jillian Michaels here.
- Aug 13, 202616x their median
She almost went speechless mid-sentence. One photo of Afghan women in the 60s wrecked her entire argument about "progress" — and what she says next about hijabs, rights, and freedom will have you rethinking everything you thought you knew. What if everything you were told about "modernization" was a lie? Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments 📷
- Aug 29, 202616x their median
BREAKING: The Michigan Democrat Convention is half empty. Jewish, Indian, and Black Michiganders have come out saying they feel uncomfortable to attend. https://t.co/iJh38Mc1zv
- Aug 16, 20267.7x their median
“If progressives have a politics that says all white people are racist, all men are toxic, and all billionaires are evil it’s kinda hard to keep them on your side. If you're chasing people out of the party, you can't be mad when they leave.” — Van Jones https://t.co/6sWJD5Q3VM
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 583 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video, 60% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 78x its own typical post.
- What is Jillian Michaels's engagement rate on X?
- Jillian Michaels (@JillianMichaels) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,689,026 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.035%, Jillian Michaels sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JillianMichaels have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JillianMichaels post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.63 posts per day across the measured window.