Jot Down Magazine engagement report
@JotDownSpain - 261K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.996% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 1744x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #accidenteferroviariourda, #conversacionesformentor, #followfriday.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #accidenteferroviariourda, #conversacionesformentor, #followfriday.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jot Down Magazine's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Jot Down Magazine sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.706% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 71% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 36% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 278 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 29, 20261744x their median
🚨 Neuralink just delivered one of its most emotional breakthroughs yet Terry, diagnosed with ALS in 2024, is now speaking again using only his thoughts. The implant translates brain signals into words, with Grok Voice restoring his own natural voice. Watching him hear himself speak again is incredibly powerful. This is what restoring human connection looks like. Truly life-changing. As found. https://t.co/dvM4T2NnnH
- Sep 1, 2026273x their median
Estimado señor Tebas: Le escribimos con la cortesía que merece el presidente de una de las competiciones más seguidas del mundo y con la obligación que les debemos a nuestros lectores, que son, en parte, la misma gente que ve sus retrasmisiones. El sábado 30 de agosto publicamos en Jot Down Sport un artículo sobre los apagones de internet que acompañan a cada jornada de Liga y sobre quién, dentro de su organización, debería estar buscando la manera de que no sigan produciéndose. No habían pasado cuarenta y ocho horas cuando recibimos, por conducto certificado y con membrete de su Dirección Legal, una solicitud formal de rectificación con seis puntos, un plazo de tres días y la reserva expresa de emprender contra esta revista cuantas acciones les correspondan en Derecho. La hemos publicado íntegra y compartido en redes sociales, como manda la ley, y hemos corregido lo que había que corregir. Esta carta no va de eso. Va de una pregunta: ¿es usted consciente de lo que significa un fin de semanas de bloqueos para quien tiene un negocio pequeño? Se lo contamos con nuestro caso, que es modesto y por eso mismo representativo. Somos una editorial pequeña que vive de vender libros, y este verano invertimos mil euros en una campaña de promoción de nuestro catálogo que apuntaba a la web donde se compran. Durante las jornadas de Liga, esa web no existía para los lectores a los que la campaña llegaba: el anuncio se pagaba, el clic se pagaba, y al otro lado había una pantalla en blanco. Mil euros no arruinan a nadie, aunque para una editorial como la nuestra son una tirada, una portada o una nómina. Ahora multiplique eso por cada tienda de repuestos, de ropa de niño o de libros de segunda mano que despacha desde una web y cuyo dueño, un sábado tras otro, mira la caja vacía y se pregunta qué ha hecho mal. Ninguno de ellos pirateó nunca un partido. Muchos ni siquiera siguen el fútbol. De la carta que hemos recibido no se deduce que en LaLiga haya nadie pensando en esa gente. La carta está pensada para nosotros, y está bien pensada: es precisa, es rápida y es intimidante en la medida justa. Tuvieron cuarenta y ocho horas para reaccionar a un artículo y las emplearon en eso. Nos gustaría saber cuántas horas, en estos meses, se han empleado en sentarse con los afectados, en escucharles o en decirles siquiera que lamentan lo que les está pasando. No le pedimos que renuncie a defender lo que es suyo. Le pedimos algo más pequeño y, sospechamos, más difícil: que pida perdón a quienes están pagando una guerra que no es la suya, y que ponga de su parte —su gente, su tecnología, su enorme presupuesto— para encontrar una forma de perseguir a los piratas que no arrase con los vecinos. Mientras tanto, seguiremos publicando lo que haya que publicar y rectificando lo que haya que rectificar. Es lo que hace un medio, y es lo que su Dirección Legal ya sabe que hacemos. Espero que la respuesta a esta carta no sea otro documento amenazante y en lugar muestre algo de sensibilidad con nosotros y el resto de los afectados. @LaLiga @mintradigital @SEtelecoGob @clabe_editores @MPlusDeportes @DAZN_ES https://t.co/DLbew0Jn3B
- Sep 20, 2026100x their median
Vale confirmamos que no puedo acceder a mi Home Assistant porque @o2es está bloqueando 188.114.96.5 y 188.114.97.5 y no tiran los túneles de @Cloudflare . Gracias a @LaLiga ahora no puedo ver si mis gatos están vivos o muertos. Sois despreciables. ASCO.
- Sep 5, 202652x their median
La pornografía actual está apegada a un goce mortífero, y ese goce mortífero es propio de una sociedad altamente precarizada que consume lo que hay con el poco tiempo que le queda. Correrse en dos minutos es una derrota política y cultural. por @andresmainardi2 https://t.co/YmesKCzzp6
- Oct 24, 202640x their median
Una cosa que no entiendo. A mí, como autora, la verdad es que me daría 0 miedo una acusación de haber redactado un libro con IA. Entre otras cosas porque escribir un libro produce, mediante su propio proceso: archivos, emails, conversaciones, borradores, notas, desvíos... https://t.co/Pxrblipcdy
- Oct 30, 202634x their median
🗣️ @EnricJuliana advierte al Gobierno sobre el accidente de Urda: "No debe refugiarse en Angrois" https://t.co/pUWvECCGy4
- Sep 7, 202626x their median
Esto es lo que ocurre en tu cerebro cuando lees. 📹: Vídeo a cámara rápida realizado por la neurocientífica Dra. Lila Landowski, que muestra dos neuronas en una placa de cultivo. https://t.co/L4FSKLrCmY
- Sep 7, 202625x their median
Los bloqueos nos impiden seguir vendiendo nuestras revistas en blanco y negro de 256 páginas y artículos largos. Sospecho que usted no habrá comprado jamás una revista así, pero aunque no se lo crea nosotros vivimos de las que vendemos. https://t.co/QHCact4Z5K
- Sep 6, 202623x their median
Existe un pacto social sobre cómo reflejar el maltrato en el arte: gritos, insultos, violencia física… Lo que más atemoriza de “El ser querido” es que rompe ese pacto en los primeros veinte minutos, en esa ya famosa escena inicial con los dos protagonistas en un restaurante, frente a frente. Nos deja caer la venda de los ojos y vemos una realidad que siempre tuvimos delante: la del terror cotidiano. Por @iMeMiNe
- Sep 23, 202612x their median
La novela sensación de Francia, premio Fnac y candidata al Goncourt, huele a IA. Mucho. Elegí cinco pasajes al azar con un script y los pasé por Pangram: 100 % IA los cinco. Hoy, en Crónicas de la Era de la IA. https://t.co/snv19YoKjS https://t.co/TJ8i5IGV9E
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.996% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 1744x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #accidenteferroviariourda, #conversacionesformentor, #followfriday.
- What is Jot Down Magazine's engagement rate on X?
- Jot Down Magazine (@JotDownSpain) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 261,469 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Jot Down Magazine sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JotDownSpain have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JotDownSpain post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.