Back to @JuliaHB1's profile

Julia Hartley-Brewer engagement report

@JuliaHB1 - 570K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.539%
of 570K followers
Per impression
4.03%
76K views on a typical post
Reach
13.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
41 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 570K followers, an engagement rate of 0.539%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 4.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Julia Hartley-Brewer's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.539%, Julia Hartley-Brewer sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 20264.8x their median

    The Home Office "don't rape" leaflet for illegal migrants proves they KNOW that Britain's open borders are putting women and children at risk of sexual assault - but that's a price worth paying for their woke ideology. My column for @TheSun ⬇️ https://t.co/U3qWPKxHya

    11K2.7K34850106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.6x their median

    No it wasn't. You can keep saying it. You can keep shouting it. You can write it on banners at vigils. You can write it on social media. You can sign petitions about it. You can make complaints to the police about it. But it won't make it true. https://t.co/8O9jT4AMLt

    9.4K1.2K4315294K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.5x their median

    "Disturbing guide on how 'not to rape women' in UK given to asylum seekers by Home Office after string of attacks." Nothing to see here. This is all COMPLETELY NORMAL. https://t.co/sZsw3Tlykn

    6.5K1.1K2232461K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.8x their median

    Over 3000 people died this summer due to excess heat. https://t.co/dmHIpu35UB

    3.4K5971.6K90249K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.6x their median

    Hi @PA, can you let me know why you chose to specifically edit out Lord Woolley claiming Jason Arday was a victim of "assassination" and a "lynching" from the clip of his speech at the vigil last night? https://t.co/H0UhPP8Jpt

    4.1K602986122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    This is unintentionally funny. Jolyon Maugham is blaming the Guardian for “declaring open season” on Jason Arday. Followed by him asking people to go easy on black journalists at the Guardian who were involved in investigating Jason Arday. He’s in knots https://t.co/CS3MgSoSWe

    2.4K34128533151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    In the 22 days before Professor Jason Arday's death, The Telegraph, The Times, Mail and The Spectator published 146 articles about him. This is not journalism. It's racist clickbait. It's time to defund these outlets ⬇️ https://t.co/wUpOfQsFTf https://t.co/jQJ8A3M4lR

    7703292393131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    The Green Party is considering removing Tasers and pepper spray from police, scrapping Prevent, ending police presence in schools and closing all prisons. https://t.co/eYAOro9vNb

    23553661676K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Please join me for my @talkTV morning show from 10am-1pm. Listen on DAB+, our app or watch on YouTube 💥Jason Arday vigil: speakers claim he was "assassinated" + "lynched" 💥Reform benefits plan 💥More Traveller sites 💥Russia threatens UK over Ukraine drones 💥Tice blasted over heatwave wine comments 💥Free disabled bus travel 24hrs 💥Burnham's phone imposter

    1351077225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Please join me for my @talkTV morning show from 10am-1pm. Listen on DAB+, our app or watch on YouTube 💥Home Office booklets warns illegal migrants not to rape women, kids or beat wives 💥Harry + Meghan return to UK 💥Home Sec: new Rwanda-style plan 💥GCSEs: Education Sec to end resit failures 💥Cambridge chief in academic integrity 💥Prison overcrowding

    39454421K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 570K followers, an engagement rate of 0.539%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 4.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

What is Julia Hartley-Brewer's engagement rate on X?
Julia Hartley-Brewer (@JuliaHB1) has an engagement rate of 0.539%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 570,308 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.539%, Julia Hartley-Brewer sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JuliaHB1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JuliaHB1 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going