董小姐（重生版）| Gate WCTC S9全球交易赛 engagement report
@KICKDENIM - 76K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 1.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 421 interactions, about 6.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
董小姐（重生版）| Gate WCTC S9全球交易赛's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.082%, 董小姐（重生版）| Gate WCTC S9全球交易赛 sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 31% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 466 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 19, 20266.8x their median
恭喜狗宝被提名新生代创作者候选人✨🤩 希望大家能投我一票 ✔️ 让我成为币安100 狗宝也为拉票准备了点社区福利给大家🎁 投票期 10月19号17:00 - 28号23:59 (UTC+8)， 为期10天 投票次数每日08:00 (UTC+8) 刷新， 每人每天各类別一票。 投票入口 : https://t.co/tC8bhKqHqX 社区福利 先进入投票检测站(TG群) 👇🏼 https://t.co/g0e84UEDIS 经狗宝社区助手审核，通过检查后✔️ 将获邀至 - 已投票确认群 🗳️ 群里每天将会有几次随机红包掉落🧧 另外已完成 19、20、21号的投票 -> 22、23、24号的投票 -> 25、26、27、28号的投票 -> 可得参与3次 " 50u x 3人 ；5u x 20人 " 的社区抽奖福利活动资格 🎁 (* 必须完成3 /4 天的投票 ) 希望大家多多支持👀🙌🏼 助力狗宝🐕
- Oct 18, 20265.6x their median
原来他们都是从这里找的！ 方法教给你们了 https://t.co/TZkxLJQDqG
- Oct 11, 20264.0x their median
嗨嗨，我是小小董～ 半兼职Web3，高中时入圈，只会定投的嫩老韭菜🥬 不喊单不带单，今天唠三件开心事： ① 手续费能返 20% ② 注册过的也可以来问换绑哦～ ③ 我这里还有很多很多周边，欢迎大家来抢🎁 用我的币安链接注册，系统自动返 20% 手续费到你账户，费率不变，后台结算，不用找人要～ 👉 币安注册：https://t.co/lWdeZg9t7Q 邀请码：508340864（点链接会自动填） 注册过的也可以来问我换绑哦～具体以平台规则为准。 有需要可以加我私人微💌 或者进社区找我https://t.co/i3KnUZyKAd 周边有小挂件、贴纸、小礼物……欢迎来抢～ 返佣从绑定那刻才开始算，早绑早回流～ 我是小小董，啾咪～
- Oct 25, 20264.0x their median
我猜他肯定不是故意的！ 我看了好多报道都说他是一位绅士 我的女神陈都灵，超级大长腿😍 https://t.co/8RjkRI6lar
- Oct 22, 20261.7x their median
刚在 Starknet 的 Quantum Hub 里翻了一圈，越看越觉得，量子这事大家可能盯错重点了。 好多人一聊就是“选哪个新算法”。但选算法其实是实验室里的事。真正麻烦的是，一条已经跑了几年的链，怎么把签名方案换掉，还不把钱包、桥、托管方、合约全拖下水。SegWit 当年只是改区块结构，都折腾了两年，差点把比特币撕成两半。换签名动的是“什么算有效交易”这个最底层的假设，没人能悄悄换。 所以我最近翻 Starknet 的架构，越翻越觉得有点意思。 它的 STARK 证明靠哈希验计算，不靠椭圆曲线。Shor 算法咬的是离散对数，不是哈希碰撞阻力。证明层没坐在那个最容易被量子算法盯上的假设上。当然，哈希也不是量子免疫，Grover 对暴力搜索给的是平方加速，哈希要扛住，输出长度和轮数都得往上加。但这是调参数，不是换数学基础，迁移代价差很多。账户又是原生智能合约，签名验证逻辑写在账户里，换签名方案不需要全网硬分叉。 2025 年 7 月，OpenZeppelin 的 Falcon-512 账户在 Starknet 主网发了一笔真实交易，手续费大概几美分。注意，这是实验性的、没审计、也远没被广泛采用。但它至少说明一件事：换门不用把墙拆了。 不过有个地方大家经常跳过：Starknet 的桥和数据可用性还是走以太坊的基础设施。以太坊自己的 L1 迁移目标放在 2029 年底，执行层完整迁完还要更久。这不是技术惰性，是依赖面太宽。执行层签名、共识层、DA、桥合约里的验证逻辑，牵一发动全身。所以账户层的“密码学敏捷性”是真的，但依赖链不会一夜消失。 说白了，证明层是自己的，结算层还得看以太坊的节奏。独立 L1 的讨论其实就是在问这个：升级的时钟，能不能自己拨。不是要演分手戏，是控制权的问题。 Starknet 没说它今天已经量子安全。它只是说，架构上让这事变成一个能部署的升级，而不是全网协调重来。听着没那么燃，但我觉得挺实在 不烧心。 @Starknet @KaitoAI
- Oct 23, 20261.6x their median
分享一下自己用 YesFi 的实际心得，不吹不擂，讲几个记得比较清楚的。 领了官方 150U 期权券，第一单直接选 30 秒闪电期权。点下去倒计时就开始跑，结果亏了，权利金归零。但没有强平、没有追保，时间一到就结束，这点跟我之前做合约的感觉不太一样。 后来试了 1 分钟那档，多 60 秒思考，但时间价值掉得也快，犹豫一下结果就跟你没关系了。它其实还有更长时间的期权，我没试，先玩短的感受节奏。30 秒和 1 分钟这种短到期我觉得挺好玩，但容易上头，我自己不敢开太大。 界面下单没什么学习成本，选时间、选方向、输金额，三步出去，第一次还确认了两下才按。合约零手续费也试了两把短线，没有一开一平就被抽一层的感觉，小仓位敢试，但不会因为免手续费就乱开。 150U 券我就是拿来试的，没当成本金。 嘻嘻😜感觉对新人活动还是很不错的哦可以撸一下哦！ 传送门👉 https://t.co/HyioYskB4U @YesFiLabsCN @YesFiLabs @Becasso_Crypto 交易有风险，请在可承受范围内操作。
- Oct 21, 2026
🎙️ OP_CAT Layer × @clawchatglobal 华语 AMA 来了！ 从 ClawChat S2 到 AI Agent，Bitcoin 生态还有哪些新可能？10 月 21 日晚，一起聊聊技术、社交与 AI Agent 如何连接，探索 Bitcoin 的更多应用场景。 📌 主题 《从 S2 到 AI Agent：OP_CAT Layer 如何打开 Bitcoin 生态的新想象？》 🕙 时间：10 月 21 日 22:00（UTC+8） 🎤 特邀嘉宾 @bruceonbitcoin - OP_CAT Layer创始人 @opdafu - ClawChat 首席推荐官 @hxtxlcb - OP_CAT 资深建设者 💬 互动嘉宾 @CryptoGouba · @Btcniumowang @KICKDENIM · @Block_Club1 🔔 Space 预约： https://t.co/1MzjBh1HAL #OPCAT #Bitcoin #ClawChat #AIAgent
- Oct 21, 2026
《百年大饼，先过这三关》 TGE 那天，时间线上飘着 day 1 token, 100 year dream。我第一反应：又在画饼。在 crypto 里说“百年”，基本等于主动申请群嘲。 本来想划走，但把 Believe 计划读完，又翻了翻 NeoSoul 的产品文档，我改主意了。“百年”本身没法验证，但一个团队为“百年”做了哪些制度设计，是可以被验证的。 说白了，问题不是“你信不信”，是信任有没有承载物。 Believe 计划至少摆了三样东西在台面上：团队代币取消线性解锁，改挂 KPI，当期没完成直接作废、不顺延；DNA 被推到内部结算、员工薪酬和对外合作的第一线，相关代币从二级市场买，不新增抛压；NeoTrade 只收 DNA，产品的使用权和代币持有直接焊在一起。这些不是口号，是能在链上和产品端被查的。 但我关心的不是“有没有设计”，是这些设计会在什么条件下露馅。未来一年，NeoSoul 躲不过三次压力测试。 第一关：KPI 别只挑好刷的。 社区参与定 KPI，听起来很美好。可如果最后选出来的是 Agent 创建量、交互次数、发帖量，这套机制基本就废了——这些数字天然适合刷，也天然不适合判断一个 Agent 经济项目有没有变好。真正有检验力的 KPI 应该让人不舒服：付费钱包 30 天后的留存、DNA 在 NeoTrade 里的实际支付笔数、同一策略 shadow run 跑赢之后换成真钱还能不能保持优势。NeoTrade 会记录决策当时的信息、Skill 版本和规则检查，run ID 把每次判断固定住。如果这些记录被用来做 KPI 的独立验证，而不是项目方自己报个总数，那这套 KPI 才可能是“会作废的 KPI”。一个从来没作废过任何额度的 KPI 机制，和线性解锁的区别，只存在于新闻稿里。 第二关：DNA 支付别只是“买票入场”。 这一关测的是需求真伪。NeoTrade 只收 DNA，决定很硬。硬的好处是 DNA 不再是治理投票的装饰品，想用产品就得进入代币。但硬门槛也意味着新用户第一次接触产品的路径被拉长了——不是打开、试用、决定留下，而是先买币、再试用、再决定留下。如果 DNA 支付笔数的增长主要来自空投预期或短期激励，而不是用户用完觉得值、愿意继续付费，那“使用—支付—反馈”这条链就没有真正闭合。 我会看一个很朴素的东西：在没有任何新激励的窗口期，DNA 在 NeoTrade 里的支付笔数是平的，还是还在动。 第三关：敢不敢公开一次“没完成”。 前两关测机制，这一关测人，也最难。作废一次 KPI 额度，意味着团队要当着所有人的面承认某件事没做到，同时接受“作废”本身变成信任资产。但恰恰是这件事，决定 Believe 计划是一套真有牙齿的机制，还是一份修辞更讲究的路线图。第一次 KPI 验收报告的数据能不能被独立核验、作废数量有没有链上记录、没完成的指标有没有被如实列出——这一份报告的分量，比十篇“社区第一”的推文都重。 我不是在唱衰。NeoTrade 在 TGE 前已经积累了真实的 Agent 规模和预测记录，这是很多同类项目没有的底子。产品有东西可跑，记录有东西可查，这是“百年”叙事唯一不尴尬的前提。 但底子不能替代验证。回到开头那句话——百年的承诺，不需要今天被相信。它需要的是，在每一个可以被检验的节点上，经得起被检验。 #NeoSoul #DNA $DNA @NeoSoulAI @EchoHunt_ai
- Oct 23, 2026
是不是所有男人时间长了都这样 什么游戏这么好玩 https://t.co/CMNcSUCoUC
- Oct 17, 2026
早上好呀宝宝们，美好的一天开始啦 你会爱上同一个人两次吗？ 在森林里面，如果你两次遇到同一棵树， 说明你已经迷路了 https://t.co/E0tb4xmBq8
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 1.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 421 interactions, about 6.8x its own typical post.
- What is 董小姐（重生版）| Gate WCTC S9全球交易赛's engagement rate on X?
- 董小姐（重生版）| Gate WCTC S9全球交易赛 (@KICKDENIM) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 75,938 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.082%, 董小姐（重生版）| Gate WCTC S9全球交易赛 sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @KICKDENIM have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @KICKDENIM post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.