Back to @Khanada's profile

DIG Khanada engagement report

@Khanada - 864K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 864K followers
Per impression
0.534%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
6.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
298
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 864K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 0.534% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.4K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #respawnpartner.

Compared with accounts its own size

DIG Khanada's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, DIG Khanada sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 202632x their median

    Today I either lose the longest grands streak in Fortnite or continue it.

    9.0K15320712350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202629x their median

    THE LAN STREAK LIVES QUALIFIED BELGIUM LETS FUCKING GOO COME ON https://t.co/f0IkM3fcfq

    8.0K29338725331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202626x their median

    7TH PLACE EWC LAN COMEBACK ($30000) BEST N.A. TEAM KEEP DISRESPECTING ME AND ZPV https://t.co/XixdnaPvUj

    7.4K1651633233K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202625x their median

    ggs

    6.7K14861714353K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202618x their median

    Should’ve never let this happen only thing I can do now is lock in for lcq

    5.1K541160232K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202613x their median

    ggs

    3.6K341973162K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202613x their median

    team in first on west is ban evading pls any proof reply

    3.5K372073252K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202612x their median

    today is the day I play at every lan since world cup or I dont make it lets see

    3.5K40560195K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202612x their median

    Every zone pull is a max

    3.2K313071171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202610x their median

    calamari for west lcq @Khanada @Buzzavita https://t.co/DbDtgJPdpP

    3.0K50473112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#respawnpartner

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 864K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 0.534% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.4K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is DIG Khanada's engagement rate on X?
DIG Khanada (@Khanada) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 863,878 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, DIG Khanada sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Khanada have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Khanada post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going