Back to @KingMateoXXX's profile

KING MATEO πŸ—½ engagement report

@KingMateoXXX - 397K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.396%
of 397K followers
Per impression
3.52%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
11.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.904%
405 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 397K followers, an engagement rate of 0.396%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 49x its own typical post.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #danafterdarklv.

Compared with accounts its own size

KING MATEO πŸ—½'s engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.396%, KING MATEO πŸ—½ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.438%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202549x their median

    One and done? Please. The first nut’s just the warm up. I don’t stop till your hole quits on me. @PigFFuck lasted and begged for more… Who’s ready to test their stamina 😏 #HumpDay https://t.co/ALSzXBqa9S

    61K16K3201172.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202528x their median

    He took a pounding for hours… loose, wrecked, & dripping 😈 I love a boy that can keep up. @ArnoAntino Part 3 πŸ“½οΈ is out πŸ’¦πŸ’¦πŸ’¦ https://t.co/yw49AJjOo6

    35K8.0K117301.1M viewsView on X
  • May 6, 202516x their median

    He thought he needed a fist to get ruined, then I buried my dick so deep in him he forgot what a knuckles feels like 😈 @CagedMask #WhoNeedsAFist https://t.co/BC192ydbee

    21K5.0K106421.0M viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20267.4x their median

    3 loads in and ready for more 😈 Should we keep going? πŸ’¦ @angelxelias https://t.co/UrNTwKUAQ0

    9.9K1.6K348302K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20265.7x their median

    Oh you thought I was done? πŸ˜‚ No no... We're just getting started 😈 πŸ“½οΈ @BrockyCockyLock https://t.co/usASfE1gGP

    7.9K1.1K435256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20264.8x their median

    Stuffed like a cream puff πŸ’¦ πŸ“½οΈ @Zen_Goken https://t.co/ClDZqoPnaF

    6.5K993264173K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20264.8x their median

    Waste not, want not πŸ˜‹ πŸ“½οΈ @Pup_DreamX https://t.co/bOCDbie6Ut

    6.6K912232248K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20264.6x their median

    Fire Island always delivers πŸ₯΅ ​I saw the outline of his cage through his speedo on the beach and had to say something. 5 min later I was back at his place feeding him two huge loads deep in his hungry hole ​πŸŽ₯ #BredandBuns πŸ’¦πŸ’¦ https://t.co/VmjvliuSb0

    6.3K858267237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.1x their median

    July was so creamy 🀀 20 full scenes featuring 29 performers πŸ’¦ Cum see the mess we made! Claim a Free Day Trial for a limited time (Link in comments) Who do you wanna see in August’s recap? 😈 https://t.co/SLzkK0IVGV

    5.6K876355154K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.5x their median

    Creamy filling and leaking πŸ’¦ ​This man's tight grip didn't let up. I came so fast and kept the loads coming while he leaked right through his jock 😈. The end result was a mess 🐽 β€‹πŸ“½οΈ @DannyRamera https://t.co/RgIbFYYHGQ

    4.7K724303120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#danafterdarklv

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 397K followers, an engagement rate of 0.396%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 14% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 49x its own typical post.

What is KING MATEO πŸ—½'s engagement rate on X?
KING MATEO πŸ—½ (@KingMateoXXX) has an engagement rate of 0.396%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 397,408 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.396%, KING MATEO πŸ—½ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KingMateoXXX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KingMateoXXX post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going