Lawrence M. Krauss engagement report
@LKrauss1 - 456K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 89 interactions against 456K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.541% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lawrence M. Krauss's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.019%, Lawrence M. Krauss sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.432% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 161.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jul 1, 202612x their median
Richard Feynman was amazing in so many ways. Was such an honor to both know him and write his scientific biography. https://t.co/weckZLcQNJ
- Feb 27, 20257.2x their median
The War on Science can now be pre-ordered on Amazon and other book outlets. Pub date July 29th. Order it now! :) https://t.co/cELVwrTfoC
- Aug 13, 20264.2x their median
The Jason Arday debacle reflects problems with schools of education as much as it is an indictment of Cambridge. In my experience the scholarly standards at education schools can be second rate and what passes for research can be laughable. Not sure what purpose they serve at universities. Perhaps it is better to educate students in real fields at universities and then have separate one year vocational teacher training institutes that don’t have the pretense of being research institutes.
- Aug 3, 20262.9x their median
Starting a podcast soon with @LKrauss1 where we investigate and talk about phenomenal claims. Much of it will be in the spirit of James Randi, but with our own twist. We will delve into everything from telepathy to frontier science. Hint: He's Scully and I'm Mulder.
- Aug 7, 20262.5x their median
Bernie Sanders may be the worst thing that has happened to the Democrats. He helped get Donald Trump elected in 2016 & his support of leftist populists could blow what should (given a bumbling unpopular president & a do nothing congress) be a good chance of regaining power
- Jul 19, 20262.5x their median
So awe inspiring to speak at a theatre with 2500 years of history. Just thinking about all the amazing events that have happened here. https://t.co/IRD4rI0NOO
- Jul 25, 20262.3x their median
Ok. I am going to wade in. I saw The Odyssey in Cyprus on the say it opened. It was ok. My issue was the casting. Nothing to do with gender or race. I just found every character, with the exception of Charlize Theron, to be horrifically mis-cast. Unknowns would have been better.
- Jul 3, 20261.9x their median
Second trip up the west coast 1k miles without touching steering wheel. @elonmusk the only thing that would improve things is if I could say “engage!” and self driving would take over! Am I missing something?
- Jul 13, 20261.9x their median
To the American Airlines pilot John who got me safely to flagstaff through some pretty harsh conditions and then wanted a selfie with me. Thanks! You made my day in many ways. https://t.co/hlRKq9NY5n
- Aug 8, 2026
The standard existential threats, like AI and nuclear weapons may not be the most immediate threat to modern civilization. https://t.co/vxCqvuNzeF
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 89 interactions against 456K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.541% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
- What is Lawrence M. Krauss's engagement rate on X?
- Lawrence M. Krauss (@LKrauss1) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 455,800 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.019%, Lawrence M. Krauss sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LKrauss1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LKrauss1 post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.