Lalit Kumar Modi engagement report
@LalitKModi - 3.5M followers on X
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.256% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 173x its own typical post.
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lalit Kumar Modi's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Lalit Kumar Modi sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.705% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 48% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 67% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 67% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 261 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 10, 2026173x their median
Elon, owning X does not give you a veto over India’s national security. 🇮🇳 I support the Government of India’s insistence on rigorous security safeguards before satellite communication services begin operating. Protecting our citizens, their data and our critical communications infrastructure must come first. The same standards should apply to every operator, Indian or foreign. I have spent my life building businesses and challenging established thinking. I believe in ambition, innovation and competition. I also believe that doing business in a country requires respect for its laws and institutions. The personal badgering of Mukesh Ambani is completely uncalled for. Calling him “Prime Minister Ambani” contributes nothing to a serious discussion about connectivity or regulatory approvals. If there is evidence of unfair treatment, put it on the table. Sarcasm is no substitute for evidence. India deserves the best technology available, including satellite connectivity for communities that need it. Every applicant deserves a fair, transparent and timely process. Every applicant must also demonstrate that it meets the required safeguards. My position is straightforward: compete, innovate, meet the standards and earn the opportunity. India’s security is non-negotiable. No individual’s wealth, influence or follower count should change that. Lalit Modi – Founder IPL #IndiaFirst #NationalSecurity #DigitalIndia #MukeshAmbani #Starlink @elonmusk @narendramodi @reliancejio @SpaceX
- Jul 31, 2026140x their median
Lalit Modi enjoying party with Kanika Kapoor and Lauren Short at ROKA Mykonos beach Bro is living his life better than most of the youths While half the generation is stuck in traffic and EMI stress, this man is vibing under Greek sun with champagne and company. Zero FOMO, pure main-character energy.
- Jul 23, 202667x their median
How did Tendulkar, manage to play cricket sans a spine? https://t.co/gNoO6dPSCO
- Aug 14, 202658x their median
Join the millions of people worldwide already using Revolut to send, spend, and save smarter. What are you waiting for? ⚡️
- Oct 29, 202641x their median
And you will see this number just going up. Unlike any other sports league GLOBALLY. Zero working capital requirement. Zero debt. Zero infrastructure cost. All original Teams In Profit. No future capital Requirement EVER. Which other league or Entertainment Property can you NAME HAS THE SAME MODEL. NONE 🙌🏾🙏🏽
- Aug 28, 202632x their median
FOR THE RECORD. I am NOT the Lalit Modi involved in the Vasant Vihar / BDR Builders property or arbitration case being reported by several media outlets. The court record identifies that individual as Lalit Modi, son of J.R. Modi, resident of 32 Pashchimi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. I am Lalit Kumar Modi — Founder of the IPL. Some publications have wrongly attached my photograph, biography and identity to another individual’s litigation. I request all media organisations, search platforms and databases carrying this error to correct their records immediately. Same name. Different person. Get the facts right. — Lalit Modi Founder, IPL @ANI @PTI_News
- Sep 1, 202622x their median
https://t.co/mR0C8DILUm https://t.co/N0UK2Gml0M
- Aug 14, 20269.1x their median
Rohit Sharma camp turns against Ajit Agarkar: Mumbai lobby moves to oust chief selector - CricBlogger https://t.co/TpoMHJlzjz
- Aug 25, 20266.8x their median
Rajiv Shukla gets BCCI conflict-of-interest notice I am glad the bcci ombudsman is finally taking notice of the Rajiv Shukla. Hopefully this will get cricket in utter Pradesh a chance to finally clean up the corruption and get rid of all the crooks https://t.co/zXc6zAHW1F
- Jul 26, 20267.1x their median
THE COACH IS NOT THE CALENDAR. Gautam Gambhir is a dear friend, but my support for him today is not based on friendship. It is based on fairness, experience and cricketing common sense. Indian cricket has developed a dangerous habit: celebrate people when they win, then look for one individual to publicly sacrifice when results turn against us. One difficult run does not suddenly make Gautam a poor coach. It does not erase his achievements, his cricketing intelligence, his leadership or the winning mentality he has brought to every team he has represented. Should his selections and tactics be questioned? Absolutely. That comes with the job. Gautam himself would expect nothing less. But before blaming only the coach, perhaps we should also question the people constructing these punishing schedules. Our players came through an intense IPL season and were immediately pushed into international cricket, different countries, different conditions and back-to-back series—with inadequate time to rest, recover, practise or mentally reset. Players are not machines. Coaches are not magicians. You cannot create exhaustion administratively and then blame the dressing room when performance suffers. India must decide what matters most. The IPL should remain the priority and the centrepiece of the cricketing calendar. ICC tournaments and meaningful Test cricket must be protected. Bilateral series should be selective, competitive and commercially relevant. Meaningless one-day series that add little beyond television inventory should be scrapped. More cricket does not automatically mean better cricket. Gautam must be judged over a full cycle, not condemned after one bad passage. Review the cricketing decisions—but also review the calendar, the travel, the recovery periods and the workload placed upon our players. Stand by the coach. Protect the players. Fix the schedule. Then demand results. I stand firmly with my friend Gautam Gambhir. Lalit Modi Founder, IPL
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.256% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 173x its own typical post.
- What is Lalit Kumar Modi's engagement rate on X?
- Lalit Kumar Modi (@LalitKModi) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,510,993 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Lalit Kumar Modi sits below the 10th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @LalitKModi have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @LalitKModi post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.