Back to @LarkDavis's profile

Lark Davis engagement report

@LarkDavis - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 376 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.348%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
1.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
80
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
16.13/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 80 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 376 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.348% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 16.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 376 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 408x its own typical post.

Measured over 376 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #ad.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lark Davis's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Lark Davis sits above the 10th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,635 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 298 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 2026408x their median

    BREAKING: A hacker accessed Denmark's national ID database with the password "123456," exposing details of 8.8 million people

    27K3.0K9461.5K2.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 2026247x their median

    "bitcoin is dead" was said by many, many times before. Those were also the best times to buy bitcoin. 🤷‍♂️

    16K1.5K1.7K4552.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026222x their median

    Elon’s advice to 20-year-olds on surviving the AI era: Get as broad-based an education as possible: arts, sciences, engineering, and wide general knowledge. Why? AI and robots will fulfill almost any request immediately.The edge won’t be doing the work. It will be knowing what to ask for. The broader your knowledge, the better your questions. (source: CGTN)

    15K2.1K3042261.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 2026194x their median

    Call me paranoid, but be extra careful visiting ANY web site in the next few days, as some web admins are not always up-to-date with security patches. Two vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) reported for PHP, the web programming language, affecting servers running popular apps like WordPress and Magento, with patches released October 21, 2026 after details leaked early. Exploitation was confirmed in the wild soon after disclosure, prompting quick WAF protections and patching by IT teams, as unauthenticated attacks could turn visited sites into vectors for credential theft or device exploits. Stay SAFU!

    13K1.8K8043151.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 2026193x their median

    Bitcoin will never break its all-time high again." — Jason Calacanis Jason, I'll bet you $1,000,000 it will break its ATH. Here are the terms: Bitcoin hits or exceeds $126,210.50 on or before October 28, 2028, 12PM PST I’m happy to trust you to pay or if you prefer we can each escrow the dollars with independent party. The bet is either settled when Bitcoin hits the ATH or on October 28, 2028. @jason Do we have a bet?

    13K8591.2K2012.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 202670x their median

    4 data leaks reported today: 1. Coinbase's vendor Amplitude exposed some users’ contact data (funds unaffected). 2. Bithumb (Korea) had user data leaks. In TradFi, two securities firms in Korea leaked data: 3. Mirae Asset 4. Daishin Securities You can't prevent a leak, but you can protect yourself. Leaked exchange data (names, emails, phone numbers, addresses, ID documents, transaction history) is mostly used for phishing, SIM swapping, and social engineering. Reduce info you share - Use a unique email alias for each exchange (SimpleLogin, Apple Hide My Email, etc). A leak then can't be linked to your other accounts, and you can spot which service leaked. - Share only what's required. Don't add optional profile details. - Use a dedicated phone number (a VoIP or secondary SIM) for exchange accounts if you can, since leaked numbers are the main route to SIM swaps. Lock down the account - Use a unique, long password from a password manager. - Turn on hardware security keys (YubiKey) or passkeys, or at least an authenticator app. - Avoid SMS 2FA. - Enable withdrawal address whitelisting and a withdrawal time lock if the exchange offers them. - Set up an anti-phishing code, which puts a code you choose in every legitimate email from the exchange. - Review active sessions and API keys regularly. Delete any API keys you don't use. - Restrict API keys to withdraw-disabled and IP-whitelisted. Defend against - SIM swapping: Ask your carrier to add a port-out PIN or number lock. - Phishing and impersonation: Assume anyone who contacts you about your account, "security issues," or "refund recovery" is a scammer, even if they know your name, balance, or recent trades. - Exchange support staff don't ask for your password, 2FA codes, or seed phrase. - Never click links in emails or texts. Go to the site yourself. - "Wrench attacks": Leaked addresses plus holdings data have led to real-world extortion and robberies. Don't publicize your holdings, and keep large balances out of anything tied to your home address if you can. If a breach is announced 1. Change the exchange password and any other account that reused it. 2. Check https://t.co/qtIGFkbaPO for your email address. 3. Revoke API keys and active sessions. 4. Review recent withdrawals and security settings. 5. Watch for phishing emails and texts that reference the breach, because scammers move fast after one. Stay SAFU! 🙏

    4.0K785595235839K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202662x their median

    bitcoin:native just pumped $16,000 in ONE WEEK. Four years ago, an entire Bitcoin was worth $15,500. I don’t think people comprehend how violent the upside can get.

    4.6K3295919139K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202651x their median

    Checking in on the fiat currency experiment. https://t.co/3J2ITkrkMa

    3.0K785124176191K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202645x their median

    Fresh capital is flowing into Bitcoin. This only happens in bull markets. https://t.co/T7a6i1MvmB

    3.1K37112767152K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202643x their median

    Our AI found a bug that let anyone mint infinite XRP, with $94B at risk. It had been hiding in one of the most audited codebases in crypto for nearly a decade, and earned us the maximum $250K bounty. Here's how it went unnoticed, and how we found it. https://t.co/m7rSD8mKS5

    2.6K362282195474K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 80 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 376 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.348% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 16.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 376 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 408x its own typical post.

What is Lark Davis's engagement rate on X?
Lark Davis (@LarkDavis) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 376 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,519,193 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Lark Davis sits above the 10th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LarkDavis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LarkDavis post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 16.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going