Back to @LeonardoBoff's profile

Leonardo Boff engagement report

@LeonardoBoff - 356K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 356K followers
Per impression
2.43%
5.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
124
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leonardo Boff's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Leonardo Boff sits above the 25th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.013% to 0.083%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.446%
p902.07%
p99143.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,462 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 89,920 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.446%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%57K
03:00 UTC-4%61K
04:00 UTC-6%49K
05:00 UTC-4%48K
06:00 UTC-5%55K
07:00 UTC-4%59K
08:00 UTC-4%69K
09:00 UTC-4%80K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%90K
12:00 UTC-2%99K
13:00 UTC-2%108K
14:00 UTC-4%111K
15:00 UTC-2%115K
16:00 UTC-4%112K
17:00 UTC-3%104K
18:00 UTC-2%97K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%65K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%254K
Monday+2%326K
Tuesday-2%350K
Wednesday-4%312K
Thursday-2%265K
Friday-3%274K
Saturday+3%248K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202654x their median

    Tralli e Renata mostraram o pior da TVGlobo: o casamento que o diabo gosta: a mediocridade com o mau gosto dos entrevistadores. Não discutiram os problemas que interessam ao BR. Gastaram um tempão ao caso do filho,como se esse fosse o problema político central.Ambos vinham com má vontade e, na verdade, saíram humilhados. Esse descaramento o povo não merece.

    5.2K1.1K41236102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202623x their median

    O ministro do STF Edson Fachin tem que mostrar que é juiz de verdade, que a indecência de um colega visivelmente parcial ANDRE MENDONÇA pode continuar em sua função quando blinda uma figura tão danosa como Flávio Bolsonaro não solicitando a quebra do sigilo bancário e de outros delitos conhecidos por todos.

    1.9K4933963024K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202619x their median

    O ministro do TSE Mendonça está desmoralizando a justiça e negando o bom senso: Tem x motivos para pedir a quebra do sigilo bancário e outros de Flávio Bolsonaro por graves acusações.Prefere castigar o filho de Lula com argumentos de 20 anos atrás.Já foi investigado e nada acharam.Qdo será a vez de Flávio B? Como "terrivelmente evangélico" trai a própria consciência.

    1.8K4591331718K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202617x their median

    Me dá muita tristeza ao constatar na maioria dos candidatos à presidência, baixa qualidade intelectual e horizonte pequeno face às graves crises pelas quais passa a humanidade. Só Lula se sobre-eleva por sua experiência política, carisma e rara inteligência.A vida e o sofrimento foram sua grande escola e tb foi o encontro com pessoas que têm muito a dizer sobre a situação do mundo.Sem dúvida comparece como uma grande liderança mundial e assim é reconhecido por seus pares.

    1.7K340681013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202616x their median

    Imaginem o Brasil governado por um mentiroso contumaz como Flávio B, ignorante de tudo, sem ter apresentado nada do que fez na vida senão acumular,tirando do dinheiro público? Não tem projeto e o que é pior sem nenhum sentido de responsabilidade exigida de um Presidente. Chega o castigo que sofremos sob seu pai,preso.

    1.6K35097912K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202616x their median

    A maioria não se deu conta de que a investigação do filho de Lula não tem a ele por objeitivo. Ao investigar o filho estão pensando atingir o pai, o Presidente Lula. Não sejamos ingênuos.

    1.7K23665515K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202613x their median

    A TVGlobo tão ciosa pela liberdade de imprensa, ontem, censurou o povo brasileiro montando um debate com o candidato Lula,onde as verdadeiras questões foram banidas.Ocuparam o tempo com a futilidade referente ao filho de Lula,como se esse fosse o problema da salvação ou a perdição do BR. Negaram ao povo um verdadeiro debate político.É parcialidade demais.

    1.3K28118311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20268.6x their median

    Os brasileiros têm o direito de saber a vida e os atos de quem quer ser presidente. André Mendonça do TSE não cumpre esta função institucional ao acobertar os 61 milhões e outros malfeitos de Flavio B. Um notório criminoso não pode presidir o Brasil sem desonrar face ao mundo o próprio Brasil.

    839216428.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20266.1x their median

    Para exercer um dos mais altos cargos da Republica, o TSE,como o exerce André Mendonça deve inspirar e mostrar total confiança por parte dos cidadãos. Seu modo de agir como juiz, como investigador policial e passando por cima do Diretor Geral da PF nos tira toda a confiança nele. Alguma coisa o STF deverá fazer até para salvaguardar a República e a Democracia e a decência da função.

    5981331658.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.2x their median

    Como nunca antes em nossa história estamos sofrendo ataques internos e externos contra nossa democracia e soberania nacional.Mas resistiremos pois temos um Presidente que não se rende ao imperialismo tresloucado de quem se sente dono e imperador do mundo:Trump e o mais ameaçador para a AL Carlo Rubio,maldoso.

    43084425.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 4,273 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is Leonardo Boff's engagement rate on X?
Leonardo Boff (@LeonardoBoff) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 356,277 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Leonardo Boff sits above the 25th percentile of the 41,462 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LeonardoBoff have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,273 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LeonardoBoff post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going