Man of Letters. engagement report
@Letter_to_Jack - 373K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 962 interactions against 373K followers, an engagement rate of 0.258%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Man of Letters.'s engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.258%, Man of Letters. sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 156.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202613x their median
Incase arsenal and benfica wan do rubbish 👍 https://t.co/o50TMlIvLw
- Aug 31, 20268.1x their median
The fact that Chelsea thought they were smarter than us throughout this Enzo Fernández saga is amusing. Let me break it down: We showed interest in Enzo. We Didn’t bid. Chelsea set a deadline, we didn’t pay. We kept tabs on him, agreed personal terms with him. Still didn’t bid. We waited till deadline day. Chelsea scouted his replacement. That’s when we’ve dropped our bid. Chelsea now pressured, either you sell him to us at the price we drop, or keep an unhappy player you’ve already replaced which you’ll sell cheaper later in the future. They thought they were playing chess, they didn’t know Hugo Viana is Garry Kasparov.
- Aug 30, 20267.2x their median
Who dindinrin pass among them 😂 https://t.co/GESgvpbwRr
- Aug 31, 20264.1x their median
You've conceded 5 goals this season I've conceded 1 shot on target We are not the same
- Aug 31, 20261.5x their median
?? https://t.co/bEaStdbJsF
- Sep 1, 2026
God please. We can’t lose against Arsenal on Sunday. https://t.co/dSzSHJUuTj
- Aug 31, 2026
How have you set a buy option clause of a player who hadn’t played football in almost 2 years at £75m? How have you paid £31m for Liam Delap, he flopped on all fronts and you still were able to move him on at £45m? You’re not gonna good at selling, something is definitely going on and one day, we will be here.
- Sep 1, 2026
If your entire market was worth N3,000 and someone who priced it unexpectedly dashes you N1m, after confirming the credit, the natural reaction is to not be able to contain the joy, not to be frozen.
- Aug 25, 2026
Affordable Housing in Ogun State 🏠 Join the X Space (and IG Live) today to put your questions directly to the Honourable Commissioner for Housing, Ogun State, @akandejagz, and the MD of Gateway Mortgage Bank. Host: @arojinle1 Click here to schedule 👉: https://t.co/UtQeNHjJBG https://t.co/QrW9TdwYUr
- Sep 1, 2026
Most people see the Enzo Fernandez record-breaking deal to Manchester City and believe Chelsea made an £18.2m profit. The fact is, Chelsea has just made a whopping £56m accounting profit. It’s called amortization, and here is how it works… Chelsea signed Enzo for about £106.8m on an 8.5-year contract. They don’t record the entire £106.8m as an expense in one year. Instead, the transfer fee is spread across the length of his contract. £106.8m ÷ 8.5 years = approximately £12.6m per year. After roughly 3 years, Chelsea has recognised about £37.7m of the transfer fee as an expense. That leaves Enzo with an approximate £69.1m book value on Chelsea’s books. Now, Chelsea sells him to Manchester City for £125m: £125m − £69.1m = approximately £55.9m. So, Chelsea has made roughly £56m in accounting profit on the sale. Based on the original amortisation schedule.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 962 interactions against 373K followers, an engagement rate of 0.258%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
- What is Man of Letters.'s engagement rate on X?
- Man of Letters. (@Letter_to_Jack) has an engagement rate of 0.258%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 373,149 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.258%, Man of Letters. sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Letter_to_Jack have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Letter_to_Jack post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.