Lisk engagement report
@Lisk - 561K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 561K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.266% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lisk's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Lisk sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Dec 22, 202514x their median
Max Kordek returns as full-time CEO and goes all in on Lisk. Today, we’re strengthening Lisk with a bigger team, increased funding, and full support behind our mission. @maxkordek is returning as CEO to lead this next chapter. Full announcement 👉 https://t.co/HzUVj94s6h
- Aug 25, 20266.6x their median
Lisk is entering a new chapter. Ten years brought us to today, and what lies ahead has never been more exciting. Here’s what you should know, and what it means for you, whether you’re a finance professional, Lisk builder, or LSK holder and DAO member. https://t.co/Nd2cUiC7Jf
- Aug 25, 20266.2x their median
Lisk is becoming the modern money operations platform for finance teams. As part of that shift, the Lisk Chain is winding down, and we've set up an optional migration path to @Celo for builders currently deployed on Lisk. Here's what you need to know as a Lisk builder 🧵 (1/9) https://t.co/ZCUBjKgaGB
- Aug 26, 20263.0x their median
Over the last 10 years, Lisk has evolved more than once. Yesterday, the decade behind us closed, and a bigger one began. Here's what's changing, why, and what it means for you 🧵 (1/10) https://t.co/Th5VEiFFBH
- Jul 31, 2026
The companies adopting stablecoin payroll are now facing a structural gap. → On the one hand, the payments layer works with unmatched efficiency. → On the other hand, the operations layer faces multiple friction points. Today, B2B stablecoin payments represent 0.01% of the $1.6 quadrillion global B2B payments market. To unlock B2B stablecoin payment adoption and grow the market share, this structural gap must first be solved.
- Jul 27, 2026
"Why is our payment not completed yet? It's been an hour." Does this sound familiar? It's not a tech problem. The rails move value in seconds. The compliance stack is where delays accumulate ↓ https://t.co/QvNFlu31Du
- Aug 14, 2026
Are you an experienced product designer with excellent systems thinking? We want to hear from you you! Apply for our open role via the link below and join the Lisk team ↓ https://t.co/bvk3F6yG6O
- Mar 26, 2026
https://t.co/bhM9WyLPiE
- Aug 4, 2026
Most think that B2B crypto adoption means onchain rails completely replacing TradFi infrastructure. This isn't the case. We are not moving towards a single, unified system. Instead, the operational reality of today's businesses is permanently dual-rail ↓ https://t.co/TgLVewS4yx
- Jul 30, 2026
Finance teams can now issue cross-border USDC payouts that: → Settle in seconds → Cost fractions of a cent → Reach contractors worldwide All without correspondent banking chains. But what happens after the payment lands? That is where things get interesting 🧵 (1/8) https://t.co/UVG8PmrRX1
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 561K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.266% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
- What is Lisk's engagement rate on X?
- Lisk (@Lisk) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 560,764 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Lisk sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Lisk have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Lisk post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.