Back to @LizAnnSonders's profile

Liz Ann Sonders engagement report

@LizAnnSonders - 798K followers on X

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 798K followers
Per impression
0.308%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
2.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.1/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 798K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.308% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 75x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inflation, #morningtradelive, #oninvesting.

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #inflation, #morningtradelive, #oninvesting.

Compared with accounts its own size

Liz Ann Sonders's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Liz Ann Sonders sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202675x their median

    Ferris Bueller’s Day off meets let the bodies hit the floor. These two shouldn’t work that’s good together. https://t.co/DcsyvzMsV5

    4.5K56047741.0M viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 202429x their median

    I hate that I keep having to post (and pin) this, but anything you think you see (or hear) via AI-generated fake videos from “me” on this platform, Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and/or Bluesky claiming I have a stock (or crypto) picking club for a fee are all IMPOSTERS … I am ONLY active on this platform (make sure you’re following the actual me, not the scammers) and LinkedIn … I’m not active on ANY OTHER platform

    1.3K3523859753K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202612x their median

    S&P 500 stocks with dividend yields > 10-year Treasury yields hit a record high of 63.4% (excluding COVID-19 crash) back in July 2016 … a decade later, that figure has fallen to less than 4%, lowest since May 2007 @NDR_Research https://t.co/oHDsuKpmch

    6591283928247K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20267.5x their median

    Initial jobless claims down to 203k vs. 208k est. & 207k prior (rev up from 206k); continuing claims 1.778M vs. 1.792M est. & 1.796M prior (rev down from 1.799M) … greatest increases in KY (+518), OH (+342), & UT (+74k); greatest decreases in MI (-2.5k), CA (-1.4k), & SC (-1.1k) https://t.co/ZgHwCjBttc

    4366617329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.0x their median

    July goods deficit widened sharply to $118.8B vs. $100.5B est. & $101.4B prior (rev. from $101.5B) https://t.co/VEr6rJBwcH

    3158616134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.8x their median

    Sectors’ % of stocks trading at 4w and 52w highs https://t.co/iG7INseyHM

    39590023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.8x their median

    Our latest #OnInvesting podcast episode has dropped, on which @CollinMartinCS and I dish on markets, Fed vs. Treasury, and Warsh’s big speech this morning https://t.co/kSm66BDdyE

    366298029K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.7x their median

    In year/year terms, corporate profits soared in 2Q26 and increased +22.8% vs. +12.8% prior, highest since the post-pandemic rebound of +27.9% in 4Q21 https://t.co/22OeGwDLKS

    377157224K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.4x their median

    Baskets’ performance https://t.co/6K7rBv07SB

    356186025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.2x their median

    Sectors/indexes yesterday and MTD/YTD https://t.co/gAWwM9QW7D

    342231026K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#inflation#morningtradelive#oninvesting#oil

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 798K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.308% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 75x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inflation, #morningtradelive, #oninvesting.

What is Liz Ann Sonders's engagement rate on X?
Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 111 original posts from the last 30 days against 797,757 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Liz Ann Sonders sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LizAnnSonders have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LizAnnSonders post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going