Back to @LizGillies's profile

Elizabeth Gillies engagement report

@LizGillies - 2.7M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 2.7M followers
Per impression
0.823%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
297
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 297 interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 88% of tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.823% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 148x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Elizabeth Gillies's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Elizabeth Gillies sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jan 28, 2025148x their median

    IT'S REAL!!! The Sims 1 AND The Sims 2 are being rereleased for Windows 10/11 on JANUARY 31!!!!! https://t.co/j3nPE4vzAE

    35K3.8K4844.3K5.1M viewsView on X
  • Apr 5, 2025109x their median

    ‘THE PITT’ Season 2 will take place over a Fourth of July weekend. (Source: Deadline) https://t.co/Z7z4bZitMB

    28K1.7K3402.3K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Nov 23, 202473x their median

    Me in the theater after the lights came back on at the end of Wicked https://t.co/onpnACnzZl

    19K2.5K23139621K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 202547x their median

    the only gothic couple ever 🖤😈 https://t.co/BXx0oJgWhY

    13K5351523611M viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202531x their median

    Elaine Hendrix and Alan Bersten deliver one of the most powerful dances that I’ve ever seen on Dancing with the Stars. 👏 #DWTS #DWTS34 #WickedNight https://t.co/DtZfILOlJk

    8.3K63226123255K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 202528x their median

    HBO building is going to look so good with this one the side https://t.co/DcoMPbidwK

    7.8K41011152286K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 202528x their median

    does it ever drive you crazy just how fast the night changes 🥺 https://t.co/bU2Km3B3s6

    7.4K70281093.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 202526x their median

    ‘Liz the season! After sixteen years, @LizGillies is BACK on the musical theater stage. #LittleShopNYC https://t.co/wcR8igpqWJ

    6.8K45868433334K viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 202524x their median

    So wait…is this Sims thing really happening? Do we have a date? 👀

    6.9K18310356276K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 202519x their median

    🤠 https://t.co/zQQHCV9GOi

    5.4K2133738115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 297 interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 88% of tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.823% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 148x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Elizabeth Gillies's engagement rate on X?
Elizabeth Gillies (@LizGillies) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,667,122 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Elizabeth Gillies sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LizGillies have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LizGillies post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going