Back to @LoganPaul's profile

Logan Paul engagement report

@LoganPaul - 6.4M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 6.4M followers
Per impression
0.439%
524K views on a typical post
Reach
8.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
151 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 6.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 524K times each, and 0.439% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265K interactions, about 115x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #wweraw.

Compared with accounts its own size

Logan Paul's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, Logan Paul sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jan 31, 2023115x their median

    Prime just became the Official Sports Drink of @UFC https://t.co/T6Mdoo7hLY

    242K7.9K13K2.1K43M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202639x their median

    I’ve never been a Soccer fan but WOW I’ve watched most of the tournament and this World Cup has amazed me. Here are some things I’ve realized about the sport: 1.) Soccer is wildly physical. These players push, shove, and beat the shit out of each other & a lot of it goes unnoticed by the refs. You gotta be extremely durable to thrive on the pitch 2.) So much theater. These guys sell being “hurt” better than some of my peers in the WWE 3.) Penalty kicks are fkn insane. PK’s gotta be the most exciting/fucked thing in all of sports. Imagine being a goal keeper?? Soccer goes from team sport to individual sport QUICKLY, probably a mental nightmare for the athletes who lose on behalf of an entire country from a tiny mistake 4.) The referees can completely screw the game, the players, and entire nations with one call. That sucks 5.) This event may be the closest thing to world unity. All eyes on these athletes on the biggest stage in the world. Superstars are made. Careers forever changed New fan 🙋🏼‍♂️

    84K2.8K1.6K4255.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202635x their median

    I keep seeing that clip of the dude not passing the ball & I’m so gutted for Haaland The entire country of Norway lost because one guy wanted to have a moment

    75K3.2K1.4K3335.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 202618x their median

    I’m still in denial that one of my favorite people is no longer with us. I’m absolutely gutted, words can’t describe how special Oliver was to so many people. Tragedy has taken life way too soon, with so much creativity and vibrance and talent. I’d like to think he’s on his next adventure somewhere in the universe. Horrible horrible horrible, I don’t even know how to process this. Rest in peace Lucas Vignale, Lucas Chaves, Gaspi & Oliver. Love you brother we are all going to miss you @Olivertree

    40K1.2K337271.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202617x their median

    Released a limited run of Slime to honor Oliver’s legacy. All proceeds go to his foundation for young artists @Olivertree https://t.co/O1h5tuIGBi

    38K7147291403.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202617x their median

    Bro should just go all the way now. That hair is thinning 😭 https://t.co/5eGE4CMwRT

    37K8221.0K2264.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202630x their median

    One of the reasons that the NFL uses the vertical jump is because its least fakeable athletic marker there is. Things like the squat, bench, and deadlift can be easily frauded by limiting range of motion, different techniques, etc. These girls know beyond a shadow of a doubt I'm ideal for mate selection now.

    36K1.0K1.7K46411M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202617x their median

    Karl-Anthony Towns had to break things up after Tom Brady slapped Logan Paul (via @Fanatics) https://t.co/fHOs6B4UE7

    34K1.6K1.6K1.4K13M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202614x their median

    "Is everybody alright back there" Solo is HILARIOUS 😂 https://t.co/YtRUlHUcqc

    30K2.4K3754003.9M viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 202610.0x their median

    Questions are everything. Because the people who never stop asking are the ones who find answers. https://t.co/MZteQLEfqQ

    18K1.9K2.1K86479M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#wweraw

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 6.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 524K times each, and 0.439% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265K interactions, about 115x its own typical post.

What is Logan Paul's engagement rate on X?
Logan Paul (@LoganPaul) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,358,039 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, Logan Paul sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LoganPaul have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LoganPaul post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Logan Paul (@LoganPaul) Engagement Rate - 0.036% | PlayerSells