Back to @LovingControled's profile

煲鸡汤长肌肉 engagement report

@LovingControled - 88K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.678%
of 88K followers
Per impression
2.24%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
30.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
562
interactions (median)
Saved
0.198%
50 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 562 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.678%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #体育生, #原味, #定制.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #体育生, #原味, #定制.

Compared with accounts its own size

煲鸡汤长肌肉's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.678%, 煲鸡汤长肌肉 sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 37 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20266.3x their median

    新手s第一次喂尿😈 还有点不熟练 还有点害羞 不过蛮好喝的🍺 https://t.co/V9v6ixmUmX

    3.2K33761124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.3x their median

    【七夕福利】 公共厕所小便池坏了 只能由我自告奋勇去奉献了 先喝了一泡白袜帅哥的 又喝了一泡带PA环废屌的 然后白袜帅哥跪在我面前 用我的篮球鞋干他的大鸡吧 最后摄影师也喂给了我(没拍上 https://t.co/AlGOJDkQlR

    3.2K32961122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20266.0x their median

    在机场遇到帅气白袜鸡肉壮直男 忍不住在他面前掏出锁屌开始暴露 https://t.co/bO50MfqW5S

    3.1K2497190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    新鞋 找篮球特长生买的46码黑金喷泡 https://t.co/RvDc97zgFN

    907674036K viewsView on X
  • Apr 29, 2026

    搞了一个tele群组“煲鸡汤的鸡汤煲” 如果你也喜欢⬇️ “白羽鸡”射出来的稠白的、腥膻的“鸡汁”🥛 “黑乌鸡”尿出来的焦黄的、骚咸的“鸡汤”🍺 欢迎进群一起分享“喝鸡汤”视频💦 https://t.co/XxjDOMzZ0e https://t.co/hBMMWkJyfO

    7914151303K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    粗去玩 https://t.co/09zdLkJ4lh

    794362024K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    山野天体暴露锁屌 #locktober https://t.co/rNXJ4MMKhQ

    640383018K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    平不平? https://t.co/Ba6kktRnyt

    426133128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    海边夜晚天体暴露锁屌 https://t.co/hCP2QGrg9p

    302210026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    大海真美我真骚 https://t.co/SPJrv5Moed

    22391020K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#体育生#原味#定制#sm#伪主

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 562 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.678%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #体育生, #原味, #定制.

What is 煲鸡汤长肌肉's engagement rate on X?
煲鸡汤长肌肉 (@LovingControled) has an engagement rate of 0.678%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 88,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.678%, 煲鸡汤长肌肉 sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LovingControled have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LovingControled post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going