Back to @LucySweetkill's profile

LUCY SWEETKILL engagement report

@LucySweetkill - 43K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.059%
of 43K followers
Per impression
0.607%
4.2K views on a typical post
Reach
9.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 43K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,875 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.607% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 93x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LUCY SWEETKILL's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,875 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.059%, LUCY SWEETKILL sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,826 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,715 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 19, 202693x their median

    https://t.co/po8utoxZYy

    1.8K24526089205K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202645x their median

    A secure place to call home. πŸ” By NYC standards, the square footage is actually quite generous. https://t.co/6JxdtGc4pK

    1.1K4310092K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202644x their median

    See no evil. Hear no evil. Speak no evil. πŸ™ˆ πŸ™‰ πŸ™Š (Though if you listen carefully, can you figure out what interesting noise is? Hint: It’s not the music or My giggle) https://t.co/ikTe7Wgzg7

    1.0K9115041K viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 202640x their median

    Be honest everyone πŸ€” https://t.co/miYU5pfR5U

    324136654849K viewsView on X
  • Jan 5, 202632x their median

    what opinion about men do you have that makes people feel like this? https://t.co/v91WUw1RiK

    326289339717M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202632x their median

    It is vitally important for subs and slaves to have interests and friendships outside of the kink bubble. Your Domme cannot and should not be expected to provide all your fulfillment.

    676100291645K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 20266.0x their median

    Chastity: Chastity is a fun method of play and control but not all Mistresses require it or are into it at all. If you are into it, great. If you are not at all, ask your Mistress if its important to her. Mistresses are not a copy/paste situation.

    1311210222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.6x their median

    You can take the girl out of the punk scene, but you’ll never take her out of the fishnets. πŸ–€ https://t.co/OEhu0s5V6w

    1348407.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.3x their median

    Surround yourself with successful women and you will start to see your peers as colleagues rather than competition. Your circle should celebrate and inspire--not compare and destroy.

    113185210K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.1x their median

    Latex and I are clearly made for each other. Unfortunately, getting INTO latex and I are mortal enemies. I hate the process! So my enormous collection is now reserved for lucky subs, special occasions, and days when Mistress is willing to spend a lot of time lubing her body up lol.

    8811805.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 43K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,875 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.607% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 93x its own typical post.

What is LUCY SWEETKILL's engagement rate on X?
LUCY SWEETKILL (@LucySweetkill) has an engagement rate of 0.059%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 43,492 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.059%, LUCY SWEETKILL sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,826 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LucySweetkill have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,875 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LucySweetkill post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going