Back to @Ludmilla's profile

LUDMILLA engagement report

@Ludmilla - 11M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 11M followers
Per impression
2.52%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
0.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 11M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 2.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.641% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 45x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #fragmentos.

Compared with accounts its own size

LUDMILLA's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, LUDMILLA sits above the 10th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.148%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,635 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.148%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 90 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 25, 202645x their median

    Explode https://t.co/iHOTYxk4zQ

    72K5.0K1.1K2.0K2.7M viewsView on X
  • Mar 29, 202637x their median

    A MILENA REAGINDO A MÚSICA NOVA DA LUDMILLA KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK https://t.co/fRFjzrChVn

    61K4.3K7831.0K3.4M viewsView on X
  • May 2, 202623x their median

    Fui buscar a calça da @Ludmilla pra ir pro show da @shakira e ainda levei uma pipoca junto 😂 Look aprovado? https://t.co/PiTjukySja

    43K4.1K1.5K318486K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202624x their median

    Casei com a mulher da minha vida e a gente construiu uma família linda. Feliz dia da visibilidade lésbica, amo minhas garota💕 https://t.co/9JbwX32dZJ

    38K3.4K223286479K viewsView on X
  • Mar 29, 202612x their median

    Que loucura a casa do @bbb gente. Adorei. A Chai mto engraçada, Tia Milena uma figura, Ana Paula craque do jogo… Todo mundo numa vibe boa. Por mim ficaria lá

    19K692604183541K viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 20266.5x their median

    O marketing que fizeram hoje foi super infeliz, não foi alinhado comigo e nem com a minha equipe, não foi nada legal. O combinado foi outro eu Não curti.

    11K1874672192.7M viewsView on X
  • Mar 29, 20265.4x their median

    rindooooooo #BBB26 #RedeBBB https://t.co/bXGHSkXn2l

    9.0K53611754351K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.6x their median

    já deu a falta de respeito de algumas páginas de twitter comigo, já deu por anos eu relevei muita coisa achando que em algum momento vocês iam parar e começar a me respeitar enquanto ser humano, mas pelo visto não foi possível então agora acabou, tolerância 0 pra fake news, distorção, coisa que eu não falei sendo colocada na minha boca, tudo isso vai ser tratado juridicamente não vou mais discutir, explicar nem pedir respeito, meus advogados vão resolver a partir de agora

    7.2K364550239647K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 20264.3x their median

    Vai Brasil 🇧🇷 https://t.co/HLeBaZ3qxa

    7.3K390961699K viewsView on X
  • Mar 29, 20264.1x their median

    Ela sabe que meu emoji é um limão, ela não é inocente

    7.0K1986310352K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fragmentos

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 11M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 2.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.641% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 45x its own typical post.

What is LUDMILLA's engagement rate on X?
LUDMILLA (@Ludmilla) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 11,085,048 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, LUDMILLA sits above the 10th percentile of the 217,635 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ludmilla have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ludmilla post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going