MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs engagement report
@MANTRA_Chain - 375K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 375K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 319 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.045%, MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 20261.9x their median
We're aware of an incident affecting MANTRA Chain and have halted the chain as a precaution while we investigate. All endpoints and transactions are currently frozen. This means deposits and withdrawals to/from MANTRA Chain are temporarily affected. If you're unsure how this impacts a specific transaction, please hold off until we share more. We don't have a root cause or timeline to share yet - we'll post here and on our official channels as soon as we have verified information. Please rely only on official MANTRA channels for updates. Status page: https://t.co/kqCG1J9GyI
- Aug 21, 20261.6x their median
We have identified the root cause of the incident and contained the immediate threat. The incident was isolated to the Cosmos EVM module of MANTRA Chain and affected two wallet addresses before we achieved containment. No user funds were exploited. The chain halt and upcoming patch are precautionary measures intended to mitigate any further risk to users and chain assets. The damage remains contained and limited. We are carefully testing remediations, with chain resumption potentially targeted within the day, subject to successful testing. We will continue to keep the community updated as this work progresses, with a full post mortem to follow. Follow status updates here: https://t.co/GP4CkG9zKr
- Aug 30, 2026
Destination: Onchain
- Aug 18, 2026
Today is our 6th anniversary! To celebrate, MANTRA Zone just got a major EVM upgrade, bringing staking, bridging, moving and the wider ecosystem into one single clean hub. $MANTRA holders will want to watch this space and bookmark 👉 https://t.co/mzbh2XJiLf https://t.co/dpnv5BrNFk
- Aug 21, 2026
Status Update: MANTRA Chain Mainnet remains halted as final security reviews are completed and a coordinated validator restart is prepared. Dry run testing has been successful, v8.4.0 patches the Cosmos-EVM vulnerability, and all user funds remain safe. Follow live updates here, the latest update was posted 45 minutes ago: https://t.co/pTiP1B6MFp
- Aug 20, 2026
If you hold $MANTRA, bookmark this one. The EVM upgraded MANTRA Zone pulls staking, swapping, moving and the whole ecosystem into a single place and it's where anything new lands first. Watch this space. Start here: https://t.co/mzbh2XJiLf https://t.co/4ECK2DRTAO
- Jul 31, 2026
What is new with Inveniam? $200B in private assets on the platform today. A new largest commercial agreement to date, a firm covering 6% of global commercial real estate, roughly $3.5T in total value. Inveniam IO CEO @RKWalker67 updates JP 👇 https://t.co/dM7utN9ljF
- Aug 23, 2026
Vlad is right, a global tokenization supercycle is underway.
- Aug 17, 2026
Documents are a critical missing layer in trustless RWA tokenization. @jeanpaoli of @docugami explained to @jp_mullin888 how DGML structures real estate data, gives AI agents a verifiable way to check it, then immutably anchors that proof on @NVNM_Chain. Open source at https://t.co/dvsgjzR7WS
- Aug 3, 2026
VARA continues to raise the bar for virtual asset regulation. As traditional finance and blockchain converge, VARA is setting a global standard for compliance, with 52 licensed VASPs now listed on its public register. https://t.co/XDrP3p3KxQ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 375K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 319 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post.
- What is MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs's engagement rate on X?
- MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs (@MANTRA_Chain) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 374,735 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.045%, MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MANTRA_Chain have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MANTRA_Chain post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.