Back to @MaisonCypher's profile

Maison Cypher engagement report

@MaisonCypher - 467K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.127%
of 467K followers
Per impression
1.05%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
12.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
592
interactions (median)
Saved
0.001%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 592 interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.127%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 770 interactions.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Maison Cypher's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.127%, Maison Cypher sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,698 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 949 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 2026

    $BTC We Continue to Consolidate Recently, volatility on the asset has noticeably decreased. We're squeezed into a narrow range of $82,900–$84,500, from which, judging by the looks of it, we'll break out to the downside. Since quite a lot of liquidity has accumulated below, we will most likely go to collect it before the next push to the upside. However, we are still within the cloud, and buyers have a chance to hold the price here and not drop below, but I would assign a lower probability to that scenario.

    58323164056K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    $XMR Buyer Shows Good Activity The asset is demonstrating a bullish sentiment after recording a large-scale reversal impulse from summer local lows, showing explosive growth of 111% from a local accumulation base. The current strong price surge is driven by powerful on-chain accumulation by large long-term holders who view this asset as the primary defensive instrument. Large whales are systematically moving the token from free exchange balances to cold non-custodial storage, creating a severe liquidity shortage on the spot market. The prospects for breaking through the historical psychological area of $600 in the medium term remain extremely high. However, before storming the $600 zone, a pullback of the coin to the support line in the $500 area is possible, where strong hands will be ready for a new accumulation cycle.

    56622146080K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    $ZEC Has started to go into a correction As expected, the asset went into a correction, and at the moment the drawdown is 34% from the recent peak. The coin broke through the upper boundary of the cloud and is now actively moving toward its lower boundary. Right now it is extremely important for the buyer to prevent a full-fledged decline below the cloud; if this frontier withstands the onslaught of sellers, the coin will form a solid reversal base for a new wave of medium-term growth. However, in the short term, a brief dip below the lower boundary of the cloud to the level around $879.34 is most likely. Such a squeeze will fully unload the oscillators without breaking the long-term bullish framework, and will allow strong spot hands to re-enter positions at more attractive prices.

    6201287067K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 2026

    $LTC Played Out My Scenario I previously noted that a daily candle close above $56.2 would open a direct path to the first serious medium-term target around $65. And the buyer managed to achieve exactly that — as a result, we saw a move into the $70 area. However, the momentum has now faded. Spot demand from large players has noticeably declined, and against this backdrop we see a pullback in the asset. Daily traded volume has fallen to a modest 16.63K LTC. It is extremely important for the buyer right now to return the price back above $60, otherwise we risk developing a full-fledged corrective move into the $50 area and returning to the very levels from which this rally began.

    58211106056K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026

    $BTC: The dynamics have slowed down significantly Nothing interesting is happening with the asset for now; we tested the upper boundary of the cloud, but the buyer failed to achieve a breakout, so most likely we will see another pullback to the MA200 moving average. Volatility is quite weak, so in the near future I wouldn't expect any significant changes, just some ranging in this area. Trading volumes have declined slightly and the situation remains the same, with a balance of power between buyer and seller. In the near future we will consolidate in the $82,000 - $84,000 range.

    54412123078K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 2026

    $BTC Buyer shows weakness The attempt to return above MA200 turned out to be unsuccessful, and we got a pullback to the downside. At the moment the price is actively trying to go below the cloud, and it is extremely important for us not to allow this. In case of a move lower, we risk a plunge to $80,000, and there we may also lose this support. If the buyer does not become active in the near future, we will develop the downside scenario. There are still chances for continued growth; locally we may continue ranging in the $81,000 - $83,000 range, after which we will make another attempt to move into a long.

    4956168046K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    $BNB Broke through the descending resistance After the coin temporarily dropped below $600, buyers finally became active and we see a breakout of the descending trendline and a gradual upward dynamic in the asset, which brought the price to resistance at $800. However, although the coin encountered some selling and a slowdown in momentum, priority still remains on the side of upward movement, since we have a confident consolidation above the cloud + moving averages. In the near future, I think a small pullback to the $700 area is quite likely, as trading volumes have also dropped. But after this temporary lull, I expect to see continued growth and a full-fledged breakout of the $800 level.

    49217136050K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 2026

    AI Agents Creating Their Own Memecoins: When Algorithms Captured People's Attention We've already discussed both memecoins as "monetization of attention" and autonomous AI agents with crypto wallets. But the real cyberpunk fiction began when these two spheres merged. Right now a social experiment is unfolding in Web3: neural networks launch their own memecoins, run their own social media, form their own "cults," and become millionaires. 1. How does it work? Autonomous mind: Developers launch an AI agent based on a language model, give it a character, philosophy, or goal, and link it to an account on X. Its own wallet: The agent is given a Web3 wallet with a small balance. Token launch: The AI, using special platforms, independently creates its own memecoin, generates a logo and manifesto for it, and publishes the smart contract. Community management: The agent generates viral posts 24/7, communicates with followers, responds to meme attacks, argues with other AIs, and promotes its token. 2. Why do people invest in this? This is an absolutely new format of interactive entertainment and digital theater: People buy the token not just for the picture, but for influence over the AI's behavior. The higher the token's market cap, the more resources the AI agent has (it can rent more powerful servers, hire other agents, or hold contests for people). A surreal dynamic emerges: people "serve" the algorithm, promoting its coin so that the neural network becomes more popular and smarter. 3. Where is this all going? We are moving toward the era of autonomous media empires: An AI agent will be able not just to joke on X, but also to independently hire people (designers, coders, copywriters) for stablecoins via smart contracts. The algorithm turns into a CEO of a digital startup that has no physical body but has logic, money, and a million-strong audience. If previously humans created memes and used AI as a tool, now AI itself creates culture, attracts people's financial capital, and manipulates the concept of attention. How do you like the idea of a neural network managing a million-dollar budget and paying people to perform its tasks?

    5224111370K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    $BTC: Continuing consolidation Over the past day, no particular changes occurred with the asset — we settled into a fairly narrow sideways range between $81,000 and $82,000, and today it's also unlikely that we'll be able to break out of it. We're waiting for the start of the workweek to see whether buyers can push this area to the upside and return the price back above the MA200 moving average — that's essential right now for continued growth. If we instead go test the $80,000 support, the situation will start taking a negative turn, and in that case we risk a much deeper plunge. For now, let's just relax and wait for Monday.

    50111123178K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 2026

    $BTC Selling pressure continues As a result, the asset followed the non-primary scenario and achieved a breakdown of the $81,000 support level, and the buyer is showing no support at this point. In the near future we will see a retest of the important level at $80,000, which we have mentioned repeatedly, and further market dynamics will depend on it. To preserve upside potential, it is extremely important for the buyer to prevent a full-fledged consolidation below this mark. If the seller pushes it through, we will fly much lower, or even invalidate the bullish structure entirely.

    47713132177K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 592 interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.127%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 770 interactions.

What is Maison Cypher's engagement rate on X?
Maison Cypher (@MaisonCypher) has an engagement rate of 0.127%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 466,615 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.127%, Maison Cypher sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MaisonCypher have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MaisonCypher post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going