Back to @MarceloFreixo's profile

Marcelo Freixo engagement report

@MarceloFreixo - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.099%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
7.21%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
1.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.77/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.099%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 3,847 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 7.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marcelo Freixo's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,847 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.099%, Marcelo Freixo sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.436%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20268.2x their median

    Lula é recebido calorosamente no estádio Moça Bonita em Bangú! O RIO ABRAÇA LULA https://t.co/ClHhkXQGlz

    13K1.4K443103292K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20267.9x their median

    Honrado em ser oficialmente indicado pelo @PSBNacional40 a vice-presidente de @LulaOficial mais uma vez! 🇧🇷 https://t.co/uSNw1fLruJ

    11K1.3K1.5K119156K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20266.6x their median

    Agora o Flávio não pode dizer que não conhece. O advogado Willer Tomaz é seu amigo, e acabou de ter as contas de sua empresa bloqueadas pela Justiça por reter R$ 20,9 milhões de dinheiro do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Willer é o mesmo que aparece na disputa milionária envolvendo o jogador Richarlison e a mansão em Angra. O entorno de Flávio é só coisa errada, é mutreta, é sacanagem.

    9.3K2.1K3775498K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20266.3x their median

    Flávio será multado pelo TSE por usar a IA do pai. Mas ele não vai parar aí. Assim como o pai, vai passar a eleição inteira cometendo ilegalidades, obrigando o TSE a agir contra a candidatura dele. O objetivo? Dizer que foi perseguido e ir chorar para Trump não reconhecer o resultado das urnas. É o golpe 2.0.

    9.6K1.3K3654598K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.6x their median

    Uma honra esse apoio do Wagner para a minha candidatura a Deputado Federal. Somos amigos há muitos anos e o Wagner acompanhou boa parte da minha trajetória na vida pública, da CPI das Milícias à presidência da Embratur, das diversas lutas na rua à oposição ao governo Bolsonaro meio a Covid. Sou muito grato por ele ter escrito o prefácio do meu livro, “Viver é perigoso”, em plena corrida pelo Oscar desse ano. E fico feliz demais por mais essa! Valeu, meu irmão! Tamo junto. É 1331!

    8.7K1.1K3821867K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20265.3x their median

    Estou entrando com uma ação no Ministério Público Federal contra Eduardo Bolsonaro. O que ele está fazendo é uma violação grave do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. É crime. Em pleno fim de semana do dia dos pais, divulgar um video contrário a vacinação de uma criança é repugnante. A família Bolsonaro sabotou a vacinação contra a Covid, provocando a morte de milhares brasileiros. Agora eles estão atacando a vacinação de crianças.

    6.9K1.3K1.3K44116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.2x their median

    Não houve invasão. Quem afirma é o TSE. Flávio foi avisado pelo Missão há 10 dias sobre esse problema e não fez NADA. Agora ele tenta transformar o episódio em mais um ataque às eleições brasileiras. Ele não quer ganhar a eleição, ele quer melar o jogo. https://t.co/MrHoXmpPSU

    7.8K1.3K2723589K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.1x their median

    FLÁVIO BOLSONARO, VOCÊ É UM MENTIROSO! https://t.co/4N0RUIgZa7

    7.1K1.7K29696117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.1x their median

    Manuais de explosivos. Plantas de prédios de Brasília. Alvos escolhidos. Data marcada: os debates do segundo turno. A Polícia do DF descobriu planos de ataques terroristas, uma célula com 8 jovens de 19 a 31 anos. Esse é o produto final de anos gritando que a urna é fraudada e que o TSE é ditadura. A culpa é dos Bolsonaros.

    7.6K1.2K3403399K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.8x their median

    Dia 16 temos um encontro marcado com o palco onde tudo começou. É em São Bernardo do Campo (SP), no estádio da Vila Euclides, a partir das 9h. Faça parte desse momento histórico! 🇧🇷 https://t.co/8BVilLMxqP

    5.4K99034852202K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.099%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 3,847 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 7.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

What is Marcelo Freixo's engagement rate on X?
Marcelo Freixo (@MarceloFreixo) has an engagement rate of 0.099%, based on the median interactions across 79 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,817,259 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.099%, Marcelo Freixo sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MarceloFreixo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,847 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MarceloFreixo post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going