Matt Walsh engagement report
@MattWalshBlog - 4.1M followers on X
Measured over 109 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7.5K interactions against 4.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 109 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 376K times each, and 2.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 109 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lindsayclancy, #lindsayclancytrial.
Measured over 109 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #lindsayclancy, #lindsayclancytrial.
Compared with accounts its own size
Matt Walsh's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.184%, Matt Walsh sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.432%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.432% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 161.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 202619x their median
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: Lake Ontario is renamed to LAKE AMERICA! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/ZFww8PexiW
- Aug 21, 20269.4x their median
Lindsay Clancy had a "psychotic break." Which is why she planned the murder, researched her plan on Google, sent her husband away from the house, and then methodically executed her children over the course of several minutes. I never knew that you could plan your psychotic break like that. Just pencil it into your calendar. I'm learning so much about "mental health" from the morally bankrupt imbeciles on this site and TikTok. Thank you for this education.
- Aug 20, 20267.3x their median
Black activists rallying around Karmelo Anthony. Leftists celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder. Women forming fan clubs for Lindsay Clancy. The last 12 months have been the darkest I can remember. Something has been revealed about our society. These people have showed us who they really are, and we can never unsee it. “Radicalized” doesn’t really even begin to describe the effect all of this has had on some of us.
- Aug 28, 20267.2x their median
“Attempting suicide” by jumping out of a second floor residential window is almost cartoonish. She never intended to kill herself. This is actually one of the most methodically planned murders we’ve seen in recent history.
- Aug 20, 20267.2x their median
I understand the alleged reason for it, but it is absolutely batshit insane that the prosecutors in the Karmelo Anthony case agreed not to tell the jury that Anthony was openly fantasizing about stabbing someone only hours before he killed Metcalf. This was premeditated murder. They had the evidence right there and never used it.
- Aug 18, 20266.5x their median
Thousands of black people rallied around Karmelo Anthony, who stabbed a white kid to death. Now thousands of women are rallying around Lindsay Clancy, who strangled all of her children to death. We have been told for years about the "radicalization" of young white men but it seems that the worst and most psychotic forms of radicalization are happening in pretty much every group but that one.
- Aug 12, 20266.5x their median
Lindsay Clancy sent her husband out of the house, brought her children into the basement, and then methodically strangled each of them to death, one by one. I don't care if she had postpartum depression. I don't care how many psychiatric drugs she was taking. When you murder a child -- let alone three children, your children -- you must be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Justice demands nothing less. My sympathy for your depression dries up completely the moment you strangle your child to death. This should not be controversial.
- Aug 27, 20265.7x their median
A woman admitting to strangling all of her children to death, being exonerated in court anyway, and then masses of women celebrating in the streets while the killer goes on to make millions in crowd funding and lawsuits, is a possibility so grim that I can’t bear to think about it. I don’t know how you move on from that with any faith in the court system or the basic sanity and moral decency of a large portion of the public. It’s a terrifying thought, truly. I don’t know what we’re supposed to do, if this is how it all turns out. Let’s pray that justice somehow still prevails. The alternative is a nightmare.
- Aug 12, 20265.4x their median
A look into a "holler." The Appalachian demographic is 88% white. A gigantic, sprawling ghetto that composes a footprint of about 13ish states. The poverty rate averages out to approx 23% when excluding cities and metro areas that technically fall within those lines. Yet, somehow they are never the face of SNAP, WIC, Medicaid nor any other social safety net program.
- Aug 13, 20265.3x their median
Shocking to see the number of women on social media now confessing openly that they understand and can relate to Lindsay Clancy's desire to strangle her children to death. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, given the ubiquity of abortion. But still, this is dark. Very dark.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7.5K interactions against 4.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.184%. Measured over 109 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 376K times each, and 2.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 109 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lindsayclancy, #lindsayclancytrial.
- What is Matt Walsh's engagement rate on X?
- Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) has an engagement rate of 0.184%, based on the median interactions across 109 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,084,946 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.184%, Matt Walsh sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MattWalshBlog have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MattWalshBlog post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.57 posts per day across the measured window.