Back to @MazharAbbasGEO's profile

Mazhar Abbas engagement report

@MazharAbbasGEO - 444K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.058%
of 444K followers
Per impression
1.99%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
2.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
256
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 256 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mazhar Abbas's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.058%, Mazhar Abbas sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 202618x their median

    Benefeciaries of this 'Nizam' are saying this 'system' is a rottan. Wow.

    3.6K8481083668K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202614x their median

    If a convict can go to London for medical check-up a prisoner or convict can also go to a private hospital. Had the government shifted the former premier premier Imran Khan to a private hospital in accorance to the SC order it would have defused political tension.

    2.8K804711234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20269.9x their median

    Politicl differencs aside the former Prime Minister and leader of Pakistan's biggest political party, Imran Khan deserved complete medical check-up and should be admitted in a proper hospital.

    2.1K38736824K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.1x their median

    No one would be held responsible, no one would be held accountable whether its a case of Gul Plaza or PIMS Hospital. What happened in Baldia factory fire tragedy. In Gul Plaza even the Judicial Commission report was not made public. So, rest assure this file would also be close.

    1.5K535582024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.1x their median

    Whether its the case of Mir Murtaza Bhutto or Mir Raza, injustice is the only justice you get here.

    82817528732K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.1x their median

    Tragedy of PIMS and killing of 15 children should be an eye opener for all. Health and Education have never been priorities of successive governments beyond meaningless reactions. Our basic problem is that our rulers only react they never act. Why wait for tragedy.

    38811131311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.0x their median

    Who and who can get 'AWARDS,' please read Article 259 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

    3947450518K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.8x their median

    Big or small Jamaat-e-Islami atleast held protest demonstrations on the real issues of the people like unrational policy of fixing petrolium prices on daily basis which has made life of a common man most miserable. Opposition parties too are silent beyond lip service.

    3656123214K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20261.6x their median

    How politics in sports have destroyed the game in Pakistan. In hockey we stand no where. Cricket ranking is shocking. In Test 7th, ODI 5th and T20 6th. Pakistan Sports Board's position not any different. Stop political interference, disband all boards and make autonomous bodies.

    3216426616K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20261.6x their median

    Notice, notice and notice what else can they do. Death of 14-children is not a joke. For God sake, do something without taking notices.

    3097924544K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 256 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is Mazhar Abbas's engagement rate on X?
Mazhar Abbas (@MazharAbbasGEO) has an engagement rate of 0.058%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 444,191 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.058%, Mazhar Abbas sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MazharAbbasGEO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MazharAbbasGEO post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going