Back to @MazharAbbasGEO's profile

Mazhar Abbas engagement report

@MazharAbbasGEO - 444K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.07%
of 444K followers
Per impression
2.24%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
311
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mazhar Abbas's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.07%, Mazhar Abbas sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video11% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link26% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 202615x their median

    Benefeciaries of this 'Nizam' are saying this 'system' is a rottan. Wow.

    3.5K8401063669K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202612x their median

    If a convict can go to London for medical check-up a prisoner or convict can also go to a private hospital. Had the government shifted the former premier premier Imran Khan to a private hospital in accorance to the SC order it would have defused political tension.

    2.8K804711234K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202611x their median

    Why Oct. often bring 'bad news' for democracy from 1958 to 2026. Saddest part is that each time one party or the other welcomed such moves. On Oct 12th, 1999 when PM Nawaz was sacked PPP welcome the move. Now, PPP and PML(N) agreed to get rid of PTI KP Govt. No lesson learnt.

    2.5K6997223113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.1x their median

    Politicl differencs aside the former Prime Minister and leader of Pakistan's biggest political party, Imran Khan deserved complete medical check-up and should be admitted in a proper hospital.

    2.1K38636824K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20267.3x their median

    What if PTI called off its long march, CM, KP Sohail Afridi called APEX Committee meeting to counter terrorism and at the same time government should accept PTI demands of meeting with Imran Khan, shift him to hospital and release his sisters.

    1.7K2702173253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.7x their median

    No one would be held responsible, no one would be held accountable whether its a case of Gul Plaza or PIMS Hospital. What happened in Baldia factory fire tragedy. In Gul Plaza even the Judicial Commission report was not made public. So, rest assure this file would also be close.

    1.5K536582124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.3x their median

    Whether its the case of Mir Murtaza Bhutto or Mir Raza, injustice is the only justice you get here.

    83017528732K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.0x their median

    Hats off to Farzana Ali for her courage and the way she had covered KP at a time when it was almost impossible for women journalists to report from the spot. After Munizae Jahngir its Farzana who become victim of unjust pressure.

    79313210214K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.7x their median

    RIP Nana 🙏🏽 https://t.co/4EBdy8IKs6

    7167754823K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20262.3x their median

    Thank you all for your response on my latest book, Media Under The Shadow of Death. I have dedicated this book to the martyrs of journalism from Munir Sangi to Arshad Sharif, from Wali Khan Babar to Jan Mohd Mehr, from Chishti Mujahid to Hyatullah and many more. Salute to all.

    5858137319K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 311 interactions against 444K followers, an engagement rate of 0.07%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Mazhar Abbas's engagement rate on X?
Mazhar Abbas (@MazharAbbasGEO) has an engagement rate of 0.07%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 443,787 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.07%, Mazhar Abbas sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MazharAbbasGEO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MazharAbbasGEO post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going