Back to @Mikey_Satoshi's profile

Mike Satoshi engagement report

@Mikey_Satoshi - 99K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.104%
of 99K followers
Per impression
0.928%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
11.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
103
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.928% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mike Satoshi's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.104%, Mike Satoshi sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 202678x their median

    ‼️WAŻNE‼️ ⚠️4,5 mln zł pomocy powodziowej trafiło do trzech firm z jednej wsi pod Jelenią Górą. Żadna z nich nie została zalana przez powódź. ⚠️Łączy je jedna polityczka @Obywatelska_KO z Dolnego Śląska. ⚠️Pierwsza firma należy do męża polityczki, wiceprezeski agencji, która te pieniądze rozdziela. Druga do ich sąsiada. Trzecia do właściciela lokalnej TV. ⚠️200 tys. zł trafiło za rzekome szkody w domu polityczki. Na zdjęciach, które posłużyły do wypłaty widać pękniętą płytkę... ⚠️ Straż Pożarna, Wody Polskie i satelity nie odnotowały w żadnym z tych miejsc wody powodziowej. ⚠️Agencja która dzieliła pieniądze jest kontrolowana przez Urząd Marszałkowski @Dolny_Slask, gdzie rządzi KO z @nowePSL i @BezpartyjniSam. Fundusze przekazał rząd @donaldtusk. https://t.co/K1VXu9Xurj

    6.4K1.4K187130365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202663x their median

    Dlaczego dzieci w szkole za obiady muszą płacić, a przestępcy w więzieniach mają je za darmo?

    6.1K1272136236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202637x their median

    Can you believe that’s a Technical? https://t.co/AElcO0OMom

    2.7K46854774289K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202613x their median

    Wyciekły dane medyczne 19 milionów Polaków. Państwo z kartonu. A pomyślcie sobie, że niedawno wszedł taki system KSeF, a w nim są dane dużo bardziej wrażliwe...

    1.2K7368364K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202612x their median

    Niech ktoś mi wytłumaczy dlaczego muszę uzyskać zgodę kapitana państwo na wycięcie na mojej działce drzewa, które posadził osobiście mój dziadek?

    1.0K211686130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202612x their median

    WE HAVE FORK-OFF! BIP-110 nodes have rejected the non-signaling block at height 961632, and fallen behind the canonical chain tip. https://t.co/C3NVanfqeP

    8951649362338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20269.3x their median

    Jest rok 2035. Chińczycy wprowadzają do sprzedaży komercyjny reaktor fuzyjny. W końcu się udało. Ceny energii spadają na łeb, na szyję do poziomów dziesiątków centa za kWh. Marzenie ludzkości o taniej i prawie nieograniczonej energii jest o krok od spełnienia. W Polsce 1kWh energii kosztuje 3zł. Koncerny tłumaczą się podpisanymi kontraktami długoterminowymi. Rząd w trybie pilnym wprowadza ustawę uznającą reaktory fuzyjne za naruszające polską rację stanu oraz uznającą iż energia fuzyjna jest niekompatybilna z polskim systemem energetycznym.

    8444176162K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.1x their median

    Mała różnica między mężczyznami i kobietami. Siłownia, szatnia męska. Faceci przebierają się, idę pod prysznic, cześć Dania w samej bieliźnie. Wchodzi pani sprzątająca. I nic, każdy uważa to za coś normalnego. Pani musi wykonać swoją pracę. Każdy to rozumie. A teraz wyobraźcie sobie sytuację w drugą stronę. Gdyby facet sprzątający wbił do szatni damskiej to podejrzewam że byłaby afera na całą Polskę, a gość zostałby wyprowadzony w kajdankach i oskarżony o molestowanie seksualne co najmniej. Nie, nie uważam że faceci powinni wchodzić do kobiecych przestrzeni, nawet tacy z zaburzeniami identyfikacji. Po prostu pokazuję różnicę.

    7588631127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.6x their median

    Najlepszym obrazem Tuska i całej tej jego uśmiechniętej bandy jest zatrudnienie onlyfansiary do promocji Powstania Warszawskiego. Szkoda słów...

    520272809.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.7x their median

    Just in: CLOWNCARD Clown Dice™ Guaranteed sufficient entropy for your insecure Bitcoin wallet. Shipping now! https://t.co/8dw9nwySLk

    32231171217K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.928% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.1K interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

What is Mike Satoshi's engagement rate on X?
Mike Satoshi (@Mikey_Satoshi) has an engagement rate of 0.104%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,036 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.104%, Mike Satoshi sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Mikey_Satoshi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Mikey_Satoshi post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going