Back to @MingJingNews's profile

明鏡新聞網 engagement report

@MingJingNews - 534K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 534K followers
Per impression
0.047%
4.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 534K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.047% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.791% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48 interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #中国研究院, #台湾台, #台湾台20260827.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #中国研究院, #台湾台, #台湾台20260827.

Compared with accounts its own size

明鏡新聞網's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, 明鏡新聞網 sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202624x their median

    许家印被判无期之后,恒大旧账下个追到马兴瑞?2015年,时任深圳市委书记马兴瑞公开会见许家印,表示支持恒大在深圳发展总部经济、金融创新等业务。随后几年,恒大加速把总部和金融版图搬向深圳;而十年之后,恒大倒下,许家印因为包括单位行贿在内的八项罪名被判无期,马兴瑞也在另一条反腐调查线上落马。一个最后负债超过2万亿元的恒大,真的是许家印一个人能够造出来的吗? https://t.co/cN4whfMZOt

    4242017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202621x their median

    两周前被封神,两周后就被全网逐句查重。 仲树(诸葛一杨)此前因为采访诺兰红遍中外,一度被视为中国知识网红的高光时刻;但很快,中国网友开始翻她过去几百期播客,把中文内容和英文节目、文章逐段比对。最尴尬的一处,是有网友发现,某英文播客的机器字幕曾把一个单词听错,而仲树后来的中文节目里,疑似连这个错误都一起保留了下来。于是问题一下变得非常刺眼:一个靠博学、高产、独立思考建立起个人品牌的知识网红,那些令人惊叹的观点和内容,到底有多少是原创,又有多少只是没有标明出处的翻译、改写和信息差搬运?更值得看的,也许已经不只是仲树本人,而是AI、搜索和跨语言比对越来越方便之后,整个知识博主行业正在进入一个信息差越来越难藏的时代。 https://t.co/ltWD1CiLwk

    213809.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202617x their median

    江澤民百年誕辰紀念大會与五中全會、二十一大的關聯性?元老、紅二代還有影響力?溫家寶、王歧山遲早出事?|中國研究院(冯胜平、 何频、黄兆平) https://t.co/81Mu3mIcHs

    9025015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202611x their median

    江泽民百年诞辰大会后,一张红色家族合影引起关注。陈毅之子、毛泽东之孙、周恩来亲属、任弼时后人、习近平弟弟等人同时出现在一个画面里。很多红色后代这些年已经逐渐退出人大、政协等正式政治舞台,但每到最高规格的政治纪念场合,他们又会重新出现。 这张合影显示的是中国政治中那些职位之外的东西:家族、婚姻、旧部、提携和历史资历。 https://t.co/adq0SdBYjn

    1434056K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202611x their median

    韩红这次麻烦大了?全民查账越挖越深,基金会供应商已被立案调查|纽约简报 韩红基金会本身目前并没有被立案,真正被监管部门立案调查的是它的救护车供应商上海均奕汽车,但事情反而越查越复杂:这家公司此前被网友扒出注册资本300万元、实缴仅10万元,如今市场监管人员已经到其实际办公地检查、询问并调取资料。均奕方面解释称,自己只是汽车经销商,不负责救护车改装,车辆由上汽大通生产改装,韩红基金会也称相关采购有上汽大通授权文件和人员参与,供应商还表示采购价格低于市场价,但关键合同目前并未完整公开。与此同时,媒体又发现韩红基金会过去另一家救护车供应商上海逸奕,曾获得数百万元采购款,而且这家公司一度与均奕使用过相同通信地址,两家公司究竟是什么关系,目前仍没有明确答案。一个依靠公众信任募集巨额善款的基金会,6000多万元救护车采购链条,为什么选择这些供应商、车辆到底由谁改装、价格如何确定、合同怎么签,能不能一笔一笔彻底讲清楚。 https://t.co/assO7omzxs

    3117020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.0x their median

    蔣介石日記斥責胡適:是最無品格的文化買辦,等於野犬;胡適收了蔣介石的秘密補貼;毛澤東發動文革的原因:不僅僅是權鬥;楊小凱與林毅夫:關於中國命運的世紀之爭|台灣台https://t.co/V55Bg77xQ6

    001807.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.5x their median

    華爾街日報:北京對台灣絞索收緊:2027年攻台說,曝露軍情判斷多搞笑!解放軍的巡航目標首要不是台灣|台灣台https://t.co/ZfE5trsflt

    001707.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.0x their median

    西方發警報:北京多管齊下改變台海現狀!地圖主權硬化與斬首戰術門檻;美國戰略不確定性與長線經濟融合|台灣台 https://t.co/gL3x5WfGLD

    0012010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.5x their median

    北京對台灣來實的:不統而統!台灣反制!不獨而獨!朱衛東說出北京對台戰略的新框架——事實先行、形式後置|華爾街新聞 https://t.co/V1oKuCUZch

    00903.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.5x their median

    江泽民百年诞辰大会后,一张红色家族合影引起关注。陈毅之子、毛泽东之孙、周恩来亲属、任弼时后人、习近平弟弟等人同时出现在一个画面里。很多红色后代这些年已经逐渐退出人大、政协等正式政治舞台,但每到最高规格的政治纪念场合,他们又会重新出现。 这张合影显示的是中国政治中那些职位之外的东西:家族、婚姻、旧部、提携和历史资历。 https://t.co/adq0SdCw8V

    306027K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#中国研究院#台湾台#台湾台20260827#纽约简报

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 534K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.047% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.791% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48 interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #中国研究院, #台湾台, #台湾台20260827.

What is 明鏡新聞網's engagement rate on X?
明鏡新聞網 (@MingJingNews) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 534,376 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, 明鏡新聞網 sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MingJingNews have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MingJingNews post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going