Back to @MisterJagger_'s profile

JÄGGER engagement report

@MisterJagger_ - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.388%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
1.39%
363K views on a typical post
Reach
28.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
138 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 5.0K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.388%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 363K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

JÄGGER's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.388%, JÄGGER sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 202615x their median

    ¿ INGLATERRA (la causa de todo lo que está mal en el mundo) o ARGENTINA (la consecuencia de todo lo que está mal en el mundo) ?

    66K7.6K2392061.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 202612x their median

    PlayStation is deleting over 500 purchased movies from its customers' accounts 🎞️ • Includes films like 'Terminator 2', 'Rambo', 'Apocalypse Now', 'Hot Fuzz', and 'Moonlight' • Comes after a licensing deal ended https://t.co/Ma4ptB7Wtk

    50K4.8K3.1K4.4K11M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20267.9x their median

    No pienso comprar el GTA VI hasta que salga en físico Llevo esperando 200 años, puedo esperar otros 50 Hay que echarle el pulso a esta vaina

    36K3.4K21356545K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20266.9x their median

    🩵🤍🩵 AHORA NO PERDÁIS LA PATAGONIA POR FAVOR 🩵🤍🩵

    31K3.5K432160716K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20266.7x their median

    Es una mierda salir con una 26'7 la verdad es mucho mejor salir con una 78-003 que no me lleve la contraria en nada como una 80'62 o una 709-0'21 que apenas sepa leer

    30K3.5K1451011.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.3x their median

    Hace dos años vino Rockstar a preguntarme si quería aparecer en el GTA VI pero yo dije "No"-"Porque dentro de un tiempo diréis que vais a sacar un puto código en una caja y eso no le gustará a nadie. Así que gracias a mis poderes de adivinación, me niego a aparecer en el que será uno de los videojuegos más vendidos de la historia" Tras decir ésto, un montón de medallas empezaron a aparecer por mis ropajes. Tantas, que apenas podía moverme, y tuvieron que bajarme del cocotero con una grúa.

    21K86110341940K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20263.7x their median

    Cuándo empieza la velada?? No hay nadie en el estadio todavía

    18K347645416K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.9x their median

    "Para vosotros, inversores"

    13K1.8K328164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.4x their median

    Unos consejitos para el eclipse vale https://t.co/9DNYsKSkSZ

    10K1.4K14458718K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20262.2x their median

    ESTAMOS ANTE UNO DE LOS ÚLTIMOS VIDEOJUEGOS FÍSICOS DE LA HISTORIA DE LA HUMANIDAD OH, DEMON! FIX MY TV - LLEGA A @PlayStation EN FORMATO FÍSICO!!! ¿ME HAS ESCUCHADO, @PlayStation ???? EN FORMATO FÍSICO!!! RESERVAS ABIERTAS HASTA QUE SE AGOTEN - EDICIÓN COLECCIONISTA SOLO EN @VideojuegosGAME ⚡️PS Store: https://t.co/iskESRZfks ⚡️GAME Ed. Estándar: https://t.co/OcUJDZuOeW ⚡️GAME Ed. Infernal: https://t.co/08Ilqk2qfY

    9.8K1.3K10264339K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.0K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.388%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 363K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is JÄGGER's engagement rate on X?
JÄGGER (@MisterJagger_) has an engagement rate of 0.388%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,297,401 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.388%, JÄGGER sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MisterJagger_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MisterJagger_ post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going