Multiversᕽ engagement report
@MultiversX - 976K followers on X
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 976K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.975% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #multiversxtech, #multiversx, #ai.
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #multiversxtech, #multiversx, #ai.
Compared with accounts its own size
Multiversᕽ's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.019%, Multiversᕽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.432% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 161.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 50K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 60K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 69K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 97K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 84K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 79K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 51K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 230K |
| Monday | 0% | 286K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 276K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 244K |
| Friday | -3% | 252K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 1, 202682x their median
JUST IN: Bitcoin stolen from Coldcard hardware wallet hack now exceeds $88,000,000.
- Aug 14, 20265.1x their median
27 days.
- Aug 21, 20264.2x their median
Yesterday our Devnet started producing ten blocks in the same time it used to take to make one. 6s → 600ms Supernova is the largest upgrade in our history. Sub-second finality, with the same validators, the same security, and the same low fees. The internet-scale blockchain. https://t.co/9FeNVyLPLM
- Aug 19, 20264.1x their median
Supernova is landing on Devnet. Tomorrow at 14:25 UTC. https://t.co/lTiQQ4h5AT
- Jul 30, 20264.1x their median
Six years ago today, the mainnet went live. July 30, 2020. Adaptive State Sharding, running in production. Back then, this wasn't a shipping decision. It was a research direction. The biggest objection was always the same: cross-shard composability and atomicity. It was a fair objection. Six years of continuous block production is the answer. ────────── That pattern keeps repeating. Most things this industry calls impossible are not impossible. They are simply unsolved within the architecture someone happens to be standing in. For more than a decade, horizontal scalability and fast finality were treated as opposing goals. That was never a law of distributed systems. It was one design choice, held long enough that people mistook it for physics. We made a different choice. Then we made it again. ────────── The next shift is one most blockchain infrastructure was never designed for. Chains were built around human cadence. A person clicks. Waits a few seconds. Accepts the result. That assumption is embedded in block times, mempool design, and fee markets across the industry. Autonomous systems don't behave that way. They run concurrent decision loops. Throughput scales with the number of agents, not the number of users. When multiple agents react to the same on-chain event, ordering determines who captures the value. An ordering process slower than the arrival rate stops being a queue and becomes a target. A chain built for human cadence will serve machine workloads the way dial-up served video. ────────── Supernova is the answer. And the mechanism is the point. Execution is no longer a prerequisite for consensus. Propose. Vote. Finalize. Execution runs asynchronously and is notarized in a following header. Finality now measures propagation and vote aggregation. It no longer measures how heavy the transactions were. Six seconds to 600 milliseconds. Intra-shard finality in the 100–250 millisecond range. On the same hardware floor. That last line is the entire argument. Latency achieved by demanding more from validators isn't scaling. It's centralization with a benchmark attached. 600ms is the starting point. ────────── Markets reward narrative in the short run. Architecture in the long run. Six years in, architecture is what compounded. The next cycle won't ask whether a chain is fast. It will ask whether a chain can be trusted to order a machine economy. We've spent six years building for exactly that question. ────────── Six years of mainnet. Together. To the validators who kept the network honest through every upgrade. To the builders who shipped on an unproven chain because they understood the design and believed in it. To the community that stayed through the quiet years the years that ultimately decide these things. Thank you. To a greater future for EGLD. And for the entire industry.
- Aug 20, 20263.3x their median
Supernova is live on Devnet. Mainnet Upgrade begins September 1. Activation September 10. https://t.co/eeCJP6fk7X
- Jul 30, 20263.3x their median
Six years ago today, at 14:00:06 UTC, block 1 landed on shard 0. 126,089,930 blocks since. 618,541,332 transactions and counting. Six years live. https://t.co/VkWhta2wIA
- Aug 4, 20262.9x their median
An account on MultiversX has its seed phrase printed in a public profile, next to the words “try it.” Seventy-three addresses have put money into it anyway. Two and a half years and two hundred break-in attempts later, the money is still there. https://t.co/sLewKKM5ZK
- Aug 24, 20262.7x their median
On September 10, Supernova rings in a new era for the network. The machines running the network are still the same. https://t.co/yQeabPsOd5
- Jun 9, 20262.4x their median
https://t.co/mNhEIlmBH5
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 976K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.975% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 82x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #multiversxtech, #multiversx, #ai.
- What is Multiversᕽ's engagement rate on X?
- Multiversᕽ (@MultiversX) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 976,279 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.019%, Multiversᕽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MultiversX have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MultiversX post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.8 posts per day across the measured window.