Back to @NoCatsNoLife_m's profile

No Cats No Life engagement report

@NoCatsNoLife_m - 449K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.102%
of 449K followers
Per impression
3.17%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
458
interactions (median)
Saved
0.163%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 458 interactions against 449K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

No Cats No Life's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.102%, No Cats No Life sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.436%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202632x their median

    🐱: I’m not gonna bite it… I’m not gonnaβ€” okay, just one bite. https://t.co/maR70hskzA

    13K1.3K1726277K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202621x their median

    🐱 : Don’t touch meow https://t.co/ezRcBK1CPv

    7.9K1.5K941116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202611x their median

    This cat looks just like a little doll! πŸ₯ΉπŸ§‘ https://t.co/ht50SEU1xV

    4.5K592102661K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.1x their median

    Bro seems totally convinced that as long as his eyes are closed, everyone else has also lost visual contact, which makes this the perfect moment to secretly steal some 🀣🧑 https://t.co/RjvxMLW2gv

    2.5K25212648K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.9x their median

    Mom accidentally sat on him, and for a moment he looked completely confused, as if he was trying to figure out what had just happened. But in the end, his sweet little heart won, and he forgave her. πŸ₯ΉπŸ±πŸ§‘ https://t.co/q4ItxVvY4Q

    2.5K1961046K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    This cat provides Mom with some saliva so she can groom him. πŸ˜‚πŸ§‘ https://t.co/7EbYwSUjRM

    1.7K1180231K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    Neighborhood intelligence officer on duty πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/bL1ZgI7eSX

    1.6K18731330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.6x their median

    🐱: I’m not your mom… https://t.co/pxtW79fIzX

    1.5K1171428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.6x their median

    Bro actually showed up for the meeting like he works there. 🀣🧑 https://t.co/empYMtq27o

    1.5K1054421K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.3x their median

    Bro looks like a tiny fluffy angel who just came down from heaven. πŸ₯ΉπŸ§‘ https://t.co/PpfgK7mshs

    1.4K821020K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 458 interactions against 449K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 3.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is No Cats No Life's engagement rate on X?
No Cats No Life (@NoCatsNoLife_m) has an engagement rate of 0.102%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 449,141 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.102%, No Cats No Life sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NoCatsNoLife_m have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NoCatsNoLife_m post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going